Has this happened to you? Internal Auditor challenges Lead Auditor

GStough

Staff member
Super Moderator
#1
...When an internal auditor challenges either you (the Lead Auditor) or your decision :mg: to not include in the audit report a questionable "finding" (point of concern) they had included in their audit notes, how do you handle the situation? This recently happened to me and I just wondered if anyone else has experienced a similar situation. If so, what did you do?

Without revealing too much information, I will say that I discussed the situation with my boss and we both agreed that this particular piece of information should NOT be included because of the volatilely political nature of the concern. (The audit report had already been distributed minus the concern when the IA asked why this issue wasn't included in the report.)

I will tell the IA that after discussing the situation with my boss, we both agreed and felt that it was not pertinent to this audit and would not be addressed at this time, but would be included in the next audit where it would be more appropriate. :nopity:

I'd be interested to hear your "war stories" of similar experiences, if anyone would like to share. :tg: We can all learn something from each other's experiences, right? :agree1:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Randy

Super Moderator
#2
Re: Has this happened to you?

Just went through that myself..."I'm the Lead, the responsibility is mine, the final decision is mine"
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#3
Re: Has this happened to you?

...When an internal auditor challenges either you (the Lead Auditor) or your decision :mg: to not include in the audit report a questionable "finding" (point of concern) they had included in their audit notes, how do you handle the situation? This recently happened to me and I just wondered if anyone else has experienced a similar situation. If so, what did you do?

Without revealing too much information, I will say that I discussed the situation with my boss and we both agreed that this particular piece of information should NOT be included because of the volatilely political nature of the concern. (The audit report had already been distributed minus the concern when the IA asked why this issue wasn't included in the report.)

I will tell the IA that after discussing the situation with my boss, we both agreed and felt that it was not pertinent to this audit and would not be addressed at this time, but would be included in the next audit where it would be more appropriate. :nopity:

I'd be interested to hear your "war stories" of similar experiences, if anyone would like to share. :tg: We can all learn something from each other's experiences, right? :agree1:
Why would it be appropriate in the next audit, but not in the present one? The surfacing of "political" concerns indicates that something is wrong somewhere. Either you're dealing with something that should be addressed, or an auditor whose personal agenda is interfering with the process. In either case, the audit did what it was supposed to do, that being revealing a problem with the system.
 
T

Ted Schmitt

#4
Re: Has this happened to you?

Gidget,

What I have experienced were findings from auditors that were very superficial or that were "so small" that I did not think that it aggregated any real value to the system to open up a CAR and so on. It was difficult at times to explain to the IA that the corrective action would still be taken with just a "verbal NCR" to the auditee.... especially when the IA just finished the IA course.

Sensitive or strategic corporate info has to be dealt with carefully on an audit report... especially if it is distributed company wide...

But all in all, I agree with Randy... the Lead has the final decision and the responsibility it entirely his, that´s one of the reasons why there is a LA.
 

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Staff member
Admin
#5
Re: Has this happened to you?

While what Randy says is true, and I am in fact placed in a similar position right now, I want to caution you to take this matter with your auditor like it is the delicate matter it is. You'd need to explain how the system would be positively served by not airing the finding.

Now, from the auditor's viewpoint: the volatility part I get. The political aspect I also get. What I haven't seen is recognition of whether or not this finding reflects on the system's robust function. If it is a technical matter that will be short lived or is not of much functional importance, I can see making an over ride. However, that is not the sense I got from the question. If the auditor gets the idea that a valid finding is being quieted, the auditor might not raise such things in the future. My morale could suffer, and I, the auditor, need to believe in my work in order to add value to the system.

I noted that the matter will be taken up in an upcoming audit. And indeed there is no reason why an unscheduled audit can't be done. Waiting a little while cold be okay as doing so is not incurring undue risk AND the internal auditor understands that doing so would enable your group to take on the issue directly and not by going down a so-called rat hole.
:2cents:
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#6
Re: Has this happened to you?

If you are positive that there is no merit, no gain for your company, then tell your auditor just that. If there is a grain of truth, a possibilty for an improvement, then sit down with the auditor and find some way to phrase the concern as an observation of an opportunity. This happens, and it happens fairly regularly. Especially with newer, less experienced auditors. But, if you take them seriously, and appreciate what they are trying to do (my experience is that most of these issues come from that "puppy dog enthusiasm" that people sometimes have) and continue to help them develop and grow you will be happy that you did. (in most cases, sometimes you just need to cut your losses and get them off the team)
 

GStough

Staff member
Super Moderator
#7
Re: Has this happened to you?

Why would it be appropriate in the next audit, but not in the present one? The surfacing of "political" concerns indicates that something is wrong somewhere. Either you're dealing with something that should be addressed, or an auditor whose personal agenda is interfering with the process. In either case, the audit did what it was supposed to do, that being revealing a problem with the system.
The issue was more relevant to another process (which is the next audit I mentioned) rather than where it was noted in that audit. Yes, something is wrong, but not where this auditor noted it. It will be addressed, but not by that auditor nor in the report this auditor thought it belonged.
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#8
Re: Has this happened to you?

The point of relevency to the audit needs to be considered, at that seems to have been done.

Is the "point of concern" relevant to the objectives and criteria? I had to almost spank a recent team member who kept trying to hammer a client over some strictly 100% environmental issues when we were doing an OHS audit...."Not relevant!" . The client was informed of what was observed (due diligence), but it was not part of the audit and we didn't beat them up over the subject.
 
Last edited:

GStough

Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
Re: Has this happened to you?

If you are positive that there is no merit, no gain for your company, then tell your auditor just that. If there is a grain of truth, a possibilty for an improvement, then sit down with the auditor and find some way to phrase the concern as an observation of an opportunity. This happens, and it happens fairly regularly. Especially with newer, less experienced auditors. But, if you take them seriously, and appreciate what they are trying to do (my experience is that most of these issues come from that "puppy dog enthusiasm" that people sometimes have) and continue to help them develop and grow you will be happy that you did. (in most cases, sometimes you just need to cut your losses and get them off the team)
This auditor has been with the company for many, many years and has been an IA since the company first became registered. This auditor knows where all the skeletons are, so to speak, and knows that this concern is legit, but is more relevant to the other process I mentioned earlier.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#10
Re: Has this happened to you?

The issue was more relevant to another process (which is the next audit I mentioned) rather than where it was noted in that audit. Yes, something is wrong, but not where this auditor noted it. It will be addressed, but not by that auditor nor in the report this auditor thought it belonged.
Without knowing more about the situation at hand it's difficult to give advice. I will say though that processes are interrelated, and it's not unusual to audit one process and discover a problem with another. I suspect there's more to it than that, though.

One of the prime benefits of experience is knowing how (and when) to choose your battles. If you're dealing with a young and inexperienced auditor, it might be difficult for him/her to understand that the present situation should be dealt with "offline" or in some other way. Deming's admonition about pride of workmanship comes to mind; if we ask auditors to be alert for problems with the system and they find one, it may be difficult for them to see the big picture. If the situation you're dealing with now is actually addressed in the future, you should make sure that the auditor is aware of it, and is thanked for bringing it to light so as not to make her think you weren't serious about dealing with problems. It's important that auditors, especially less experienced ones, aren't inhibited by things they may not fully understand.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R Mix Multi-Site/Individual Certification - Has this ever happened to anyone? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 14
J How to keep MDD certificate valid when legal manufacturer has liquidity problem EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Should APQP/PPAP has its own section in a QM? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
G Special 510K possible? Only the packaging has changed Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
Louddogsbark When your 13485:2016 certificate has been pulled ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
lanley liao What shoud i do if our company top management has been changed. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 8
S PSW - Requirements for "off-the shelf" component that has multiply manufacturing locations Off the Shelf Item Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
L GRR for a tolerance that has changed Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
D Partial FAI - AS9102 - One single drawing has 10 part numbers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
BeaBea ISO 9001 Customer Feedback Methods - What has worked for your company? Service Industry Specific Topics 17
S Has anybody done IMS - Management Review Meeting ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 8
M Has anyone has been through an MDR audit? (3/2020) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Has anyone heard of Run at Risk? Manufacturing and Related Processes 15
B ASA Aviation Supply Association - Has anyone heard of ASA? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
B Has anyone done an IEC 60601-1 gap analysis to IEC 60335? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
Z 510(k) usage - Company has 2 physically similar products Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
D Has anyone had sudden challenges from Korea-MFDS? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
Sidney Vianna IAQG News IAQG has a new website - December 2019 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
Richard Regalado ISO 22301:2019 has been published - Nov 2019 Business Continuity & Resiliency Planning (BCRP) 0
S FAIR - If we have not produced a part in over 2 years, but nothing has changed AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
Nicole Desouza Who has to be compliant with REACH Declarations? REACH and RoHS Conversations 11
CycleMike GD&T - Hole pattern - Print (attached) has a single Datum Reference Frame Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
A Would an MRP system that has been in use for over 10 years require validation? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
W Informational VDI 2017 - Medical Grade Plastics - German VDI has published a "Richtlinie" Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
D FDA Biomarker Qualification Program - Has anyone prepared an application? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
U Hand-Held dosing device has no PATIENT - Interpretation of the PATIENT definition IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
L Has anyone heard of the 2 pan system? Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
N Technical File Reviewer has requested more testing to ISO 10993 Other Medical Device Related Standards 10
I Who has had to move from ISO 9001:2015 to ISO 13485 and what were the challenges? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
M Informational Health Canada has launched an e-Learning tool to aid in understanding the premarket regulatory requirements for medical devices in Canada Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Has anyone here assessed the latest Abbreviated 510(K) guidance document? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
M Does anyone has a good verification and validation plan template? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Sidney Vianna Informational UTC ASQR Rev.11 has a mistake; certification of distributors to IATF 16949 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
lilybef FDA and Biocompatability Testing - Reviewer has requested implantation testing Other Medical Device Related Standards 11
D Has anyone undergone a BARDA (HHS) audit as part of their grant process? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
Sidney Vianna LinkedIn bug - Anyone has any idea of how to fix this? Posts not showing for me in a Group feed. Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 2
M FDA News FDA Report - FDA Has Taken Steps to Strengthen The 510(k) Program Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
C Has an amended version of IEC 60601-1-6 TRF been released for use in conjunction with IEC62366-1:2015? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 0
planB ISO 10993-1:2018 has just been published Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
S ISO 13485 Consultant Question - The company has 5 part time employees ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
K Has anyone used QAI for training? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 7
Q MHRA has released a new guidance document related to 'GXP' Data Integrity EU Medical Device Regulations 3
B FDA Philippines has no check or balance outside the health department Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
S Doubts about SPC taken in Machining - Part has +-0.01 Tolerance Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
D Has anyone here had any experience with PQ-FMEA software? FMEA and Control Plans 1
P NPR Metric - What if Customer has relaxed measure? TL 9000 Telecommunications Standard and QuEST 1
D EU Harmonized Standards to which a company has declared compliance EU Medical Device Regulations 13
N Customer Survey Question Has Me Stumped - Compliance with Laws and Regulations Customer and Company Specific Requirements 4
B Records Destroyed - Hurricane Harvey has likely destroyed our Quality Systems Records Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 10
S Has anyone completed IATF 16949 Certification - Share your Audit Experience? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom