Help interpreting MIL-STD-105E Single Sampling Plans Tables

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#1
Hi All,

I'm needing some help interpreting some of the tables in the MIL-STD-105 (E) standard. In particular the Single Sampling Plans tables (Table II).

My confusion is this: how/why is it that the AQLs are specified up to 1000?

Aren't AQLs expressed as percentages? In practice, is there any reason to even consider the columns of AQL >= 100?

Also...
I know that MIL-STD-105E has been superceded by ANSI/ASQC Z1.4, but as I understand, they are still quite similar. So for anyone (like me) just wanting to explore acceptance sampling without having to buy the ANSI/ASQC standard, the MIL-STD-105E can still be a good starting point.
Can anyone familiar with the differences between the two please confirm?

Thanks in advance!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

WCHorn

Rubber, Too Glamorous?
Trusted Information Resource
#2
Re: Help interpreting MIL-STD-105E tables

There is the potential for defects per piece inspected, so the higher AQLs are for that purpose.

Z1.4 and 105E yield the same sample sizes and accept/reject numbers. There may be some subtle differences but I don't think those differences affect the accept/reject decision.
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#3
Re: Help interpreting MIL-STD-105E tables

Thanks for the prompt reply WCHorn.
...but I'm afraid my statistically-challenged brain is still confused. :eek:

I've seen some industry guidances, and SOPs from other companies, specifying a default AQL of 1.0. This makes sense to me: we want confidence that the percent defects in any given accepted lot are never above 1%.
But an AQL of 65-100, let alone 101-1000? Doesn't make sense...

Also, the acceptance and rejection numbers for AQL >= 65 are larger than the total sample sizes. This too, I find very confusing... :confused:

In the definition note for AQL, the standard states:
"...the AQL is a designated value of the percent defective...for which lots will be accepted most of the time..."

So, doesn't this mean that selecting an AQL of 100 would allow lot acceptance even if 100% of the samples were found defective? (which clearly makes no sense... :confused:).

Can you possibly give (or reference) a simple example in which these higher AQLs might be useful?
 

WCHorn

Rubber, Too Glamorous?
Trusted Information Resource
#4
Re: Help interpreting MIL-STD-105E tables

This makes sense to me: we want confidence that the percent defects in any given accepted lot are never above 1%.
Starting here, you are actually assuring that the average percent lot defective of a series of lots is 1 percent or less (assuming you're using the normal/tightened/reduced switching procedures). If you want to limit the percent lot defective in a single lot, the standard gives limiting quality (LQ) plans for that purpose.

Can you possibly give (or reference) a simple example in which these higher AQLs might be useful?
If you're making something that has the possibility of several defects per unit (an automotive fender with paint defects, for example, where there is a limit of, say, 5 per unit), then you could use an AQL of 250 (250 defects per hundred units). That would mean the average defects per unit would be 2.5 or less, again using the switching procedures.

If a single defect on a unit makes the unit a defect, then you're perception is correct; it doesn't make sense. If there are some number of defects per unit allowed before the unit is declared defective, then the larger numbers make sense. I'm sure other's on the Cove may be able to give you better examples. I made this one up.
 

David-D

Involved In Discussions
#5
It goes back to the earlier poster's comments about counting defects, rather than defective units. For example you'd count how many total scratches you had on your sample of 3 doors.

For the example of a sample size of 3 (code B) with an AQL of 1000%, you would inspect three items and if there were 44 or less defects (scratches, gouges, etc) on all 3 of the sample doors in total. If there are 45 or more defects, the lot would be rejected.

As it is a 1000% AQL, if the supplier was running at 10 defects per item, them they would consistently have the product accepted.

Hope that helps.

David
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#6
Ah-ha! Thanks! The numbers make sense now.

Obviously I was (mistakenly) assuming that each unit was either declared defective or not (pass/fail type inspection).
...I had not considered the possibility of multiple defects per unit...

That being said, it's hard to imagine ever considering 30 defects in 2 samples (Sample code A, AQL=1000) to be acceptable. I guess if said defects were really minor...

In anycase, at least I understand the numbers now... thanks again!

...now, on with the rest of the standard.... :read:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Help interpreting 21 CFR Part 806 (corrections and removals) Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
M Biocompatibility in Respiratory Products - Help interpreting whitepaper IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 22
B Help with interpreting stock market terminologies Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 4
S Interpreting Level of Confidence - Round Robin for Tensile Testing - Help needed Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
N TL 9000 - Help Interpreting Normalization Unit for Measurements TL 9000 Telecommunications Standard and QuEST 2
L Software and Web Site Development - Need help with interpreting 7.5.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
P Help Interpreting "Variable Tolerance Limit" - MMC Modifiers - Geometric Tolerance Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 18
E Please help! ! I AM FRASTRATED SO MUCH! Should inactive ingredient be included in the unit formula if it is removed during the manufacturing process? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Help understanding what it takes to implement a QMS that is ISO 13485 compliant ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T Need 5 why’s help AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 15
T Minitab Coding Help Using Minitab Software 0
G Help:Risk Management - Accessories US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
T Containment help AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
Kevin Walters IAQG Required Audit Days Needed (Please help) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
T Need help understanding AS6174 clause 3.1.5. AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
R First Time Managing Calibration and Measurement System. Need Help. General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 19
M Can someone help me with this CMM programming question? Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
C Need help in determining applicable clause for an audit finding (based on AS9120B) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
M Attempting to Poke Yoke a wire crimping process...need help Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
marmotte Help with Surgical Class I + 510(k) exemption US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
T Help with updating procedures ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
P Looking for help with an Ansys Workbench problem Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
C I need your help to find the action plan for these quality objectives Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 23
O New metal detector, ccp -help! Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 2
J PFMEA/control plan question- PLEASE HELP ! IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
J Help needed on clauses identification ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
S HELP in setting-up QMS Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 4
R Need help on calibration result analysis Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 17
S Help in SMART goals AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
Vader22 IATF 16949 extended manufacturing site help IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
G Need Help with Run @ Rate for Medical Devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
F Need help in IMS management review Management Review Meetings and related Processes 3
A Please Help With EOQ Calculation Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
S Help needed in choosing the method of calculating the minimum sample size Internal Auditing 12
D IATF 16949 Certification and Letter of Conformance expiry (Help!!!) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
S I need help in corrective action plan Nonconformance and Corrective Action 15
S Help in document control procedure Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 14
D Weird spec sheet - need help Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 3
Edward Reesor ISO 19223 Discussion (Help) Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
J Help to understand and response to API AAR during the re-certification audit Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 17
S NC and Deviation approach - please help Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 12
K Need Help With Auditing Suppliers Against ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 50
R Lead auditor scenario (Need help) is this non conforming to ISO13485 Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
J HELP NEEDED ! Risk Management Exercise ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 12
D Help Me. Non conformitty in External Audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
U Need Help With API Q2 Quality Manual Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 8
A Nonconformity help IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
J ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.5.1 Control of Production and service provision - Help with Work Instruction Access ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
Azaarus Help with CAPA for an IATF finding regarding inspection documentation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A Help needed with locating conector Design and Development of Products and Processes 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom