Help With A Statistical Problem

E Wall

Just Me!
Super Moderator
#1
I'm Statisically Challenged! Will anyone help?

I have a question, and since I don't know much about statistics...I don't have a clue how difficult it is to answer. Here goes:

Example:
One Lot of 80 parts

I am told that each part has a 7% chance of not meeting spec (as opposed to 7% of the Lot).

I am thinking that the overall accuracy % isn't 93% per lot as has been stated, but do not know if I am right, so before I open mouth and insert foot with the folks saying this...Can/Will anyone help with what the true accuracy would be? and Why?

Thanks in advance for any effort to help!
Eileen :frust: :ko: Wall
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
M

Michel Saad

#2
I am not sure I understand the question because I am not sure what you mean by accuracy but here is some information.

If every part has a probability of 93% of being within spec (7% out of spec) then the probability of the entire lot being good (all 80 parts) is 0.93^80 = 0.3% NOT GREAT!

If you want a probablity of 79 part out of 80 being good, then 79/80 = 98.75% to the 80th square root = 99.984%. That is the probability of being within spec that each part has to meet to have 79 out of 80 good parts.

I hope this helps.
 
B

Bill Levinson

#3
I'm not sure what you mean by "accuracy." Yield, perhaps?

If each piece has a 7% chance of being bad and there are 80 pieces in the sample, you can expect 5.6 bad pieces per sample. The binomial distribution shows the chance of getting x bad pieces (x ranging from 0 to 80) pieces in the sample.

If c is the acceptance number (number of bad pieces you're allowed to have without rejecting the lot), the cumulative binomial shows the chance that the lot will pass. If c=0 (see Michel's post) is the acceptance number, the chance of passing is 0.93^80 = 0.0030 (0.3%)!
 

E Wall

Just Me!
Super Moderator
#4
Thank you for helping me cover my assets!

Michel & Bill: Thank you both for the responses!

The accuracy was the supplier term used and I was trying not to suppliment or rephrase in my own terms. According to them their process is 93% accurate, that is the overall % they claim for running a part through their process. This is a new process for them based on our requirements, and is a work-in-progress toward 100% part accuracy.

On a single part basis, I felt they were correct. However; they also tried to apply that % to the lot (liklihood of all good parts), which I felt was inaccurate...but didn't know how to prove it.

My boss is getting me more involved in problem solving and I think I need to take a class or two in statistics to help. I do fine in the abstract, but when it comes to proving out hypothesis...they want numbers.

Thank you both again :bigwave:
Eileen
 
Last edited:
D

Dave Strouse

#5
How would that work?

Eileen -

You seem to believe that there is some difference in the % meeting specification per lot and per piece. How would that work?

Consider 100 colored beads. Red beads are "good", white beads are "bad". There are 93 red beads and 7 white beads.

If we reach blindly into a well stirred and mixed bowl of the 100 beads, our chances of pulling any one white bead out are 7%. Then we would say the likelihood of any one bead being bad is 7%.

The total % bad in the lot of 100 is 7 out of 100 or 7%.

That is I believe what the supplier is telling you. How would they arrive at an estimation of the probability of any one part being bad without having an estimation of the lot % bad and how could those two numbers be different? I'll suggest one way how they could be different later on.

Their use of "accuracy" to describe this situation is questionable and in fact downright incorrect.

The statistical concepts involved here are random sampling ( why the bowl must be reached into blindly) and homogenaity ( why the bowl must be well mixed).

If those two pricnciples of randomnous in sampling and homogenaity of production are violated, you might have reason to question that the per piece probability and lot probability are different based on the place or time sampling occurs.

The previous posters were correct in their assessment of finding 0 defects if all are examined. You can devise a sample plan to find with any assurance the % defective if you want to track the suppliers improvement. For instance 32 pieces with 0 defects will assure you the lot is less than 7% defective with 95% confidence.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
K Please help identify appropriate statistical treatment Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 13
ScottK Root Sum Square and Statistical Tolerancing help needed Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
samer Statistical Analysis for Sales Process? Can you help? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
E Help on identifying the correct statistical tool - Defects vs. Total products Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
D Amendment Class II - Please confirm if the submission is by email (Canada) - Help Canada Medical Device Regulations 0
T ISO/IEC 17065 certification scheme Help Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 7
T Help to Suggest name for a new certification and inspection company Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 7
SocalSurfer AS9100 new certificate, but need QMS software, help Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 2
L Manufacturing Process Audit Help IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
M Case study help as per ISO 9001: 2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
M Case study solution help required as per ISO 9001 : 2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
A Beginners help with ISO3951-2 Combined control s-method n>5 what is Phi ?? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
MDD_QNA Medical Device Software - Is a Help Button required? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
S Need help with analysing a survey on minitab Using Minitab Software 1
M Help me improve the definition for internal PPM Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
I Help: QFD House of Quality Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
C New to Site - Request Help with API Q2 Implementation Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 10
O Please, help with document on ISO/ TS 17758 and (IDF 87: 1979). Thank you. Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
A Class medical device (MDD) - Classification help EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K A proposal for the model Quality Management - I need help for the project ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
A Help with Drawing Review - ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q % Study variation low, % tolerance high - GR&R Interpretation help Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
R Probability - Need a help to solve the below question Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
M Thanks for the help Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 0
Judy Abbott Can any one help me with an urgent BIOCOMPATIBILITY Impact assessment? Internal Auditing 9
A Help establishing regulatory requirements - Plastic dental cartridge syringe US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Medical Device Contract Manufacturing Requirements and Information - Help wanted ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
8 Need Help - Runout - Function Gage Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
T Burn out - Tips to help combat QC burnout Career and Occupation Discussions 9
Emran.mi Measurement system analysis - Can you help me about implementation MSA for CMM device Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
S New to FAIR, need help in filling it out AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
M Informational From RAPS: Danish Regulators Seek to Help Smaller Companies With EU MDR Compliance Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Reliability Testing - Weibull Analysis Help Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4
L Help me to decide which test to use - If each proportion belongs to the same population Using Minitab Software 7
M Informational US FDA issued the first warning letter for UDI violations to help ensure compliance Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
T QMS Template Help - Small machine shop/job shop Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
R Pls help --- Need expert advice on Video Measurement Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 0
B Will you please help me with my academic project? Repair & calibration service for test equipment ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
B [Help] Customer Engagement Survey for MBA Project - due Apr19 Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
B Help with Customer Engagement Survey for MBA Project - due Apr19 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
Q ISO 3310 Clarification Help - Aperture sizes for sieves used for particle sorting Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
Ajit Basrur Need help to understand HIPAA requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 17
JoshuaFroud FDA Form MDSAP AU F0029.1.004 - Help with Completion US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
supadrai Aviation MRO Project facility coming to U-Tapao airport in Thailand - Help Career and Occupation Discussions 2
E Small one man shop with QMS (shoptech e2) | AS9100 cert help AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 46
L Please help me with the process of getting ISO 9001 certified Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 15
S Help develop sampling plan for prototype samples (medical devices) Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 7
J Nonconforming product procedures SOP help :) Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
J Help with Arburg Allround 320s Injection Molding Machine Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
Z I need help with getting a CFS in China Manufacturing and Related Processes 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom