Help with ISO 13485 Clause 8.3 "Rework" as applicable to Medical Device Servicing

X

XeniAnnoula

#1
Hello again --

Second post, this time on section 8.3 and that tricky "rework".

Our company sells and services (only) medical devices and we are now preparing to be certified against 13485. I am the QM for our company, and have worked with our ISO advisor for almost a decade, up to this point in regard only to our 9001 certification.

We are running into a couple of disagreements as we prepare for 13485. This is one of them: she is interpreting "If product needs to be reworked ..." in 8.3 to include any need for us to make a service visit (for the same reported issue) more than once. We consider this simply part of a normal service routine which sometimes requires more than one visit to resolve a problem. I'm afraid I feel she's misinterpreting the intention of this part of the standard, specifically the meaning of this word. While I have the utmost respect for her knowledge and brain-power under most circumstances, we may have a language issue here as her native language is not English while mine is (her command is superb, however -- don't misunderstand please).

I've read everything on this site regarding the meaning of "rework" and while I can see that there are some shades of difference between industries and applications, it seems quite clear that while both 'rework' and 'repair' can apply to the manufacturing process, I see no evidence of 'rework' per se applying to post-manufacture ('repair' however clearly can apply). And I find no support whatsoever for 'rework' being equivalent to 're-repair'.

If anyone's familiar with the paragraph to which I'm referring, you'll understand why I/we don't wish to be forced into this documentation/work instruction/authorization/approval loop unnecessarily, especially since we've taken great pains thus far with our QMS to weed out any administrative busy-work.:frust:

I'd hugely appreciate any opinions out there, pro or con. I'll stand up for my position on this if needed, but I don't want to cross our advisor without being 110% certain of my position.

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Hello again --

Second post, this time on section 8.3 and that tricky "rework".

Our company sells and services (only) medical devices and we are now preparing to be certified against 13485. I am the QM for our company, and have worked with our ISO advisor for almost a decade, up to this point in regard only to our 9001 certification.

We are running into a couple of disagreements as we prepare for 13485. This is one of them: she is interpreting "If product needs to be reworked ..." in 8.3 to include any need for us to make a service visit (for the same reported issue) more than once. We consider this simply part of a normal service routine which sometimes requires more than one visit to resolve a problem. I'm afraid I feel she's misinterpreting the intention of this part of the standard, specifically the meaning of this word. While I have the utmost respect for her knowledge and brain-power under most circumstances, we may have a language issue here as her native language is not English while mine is (her command is superb, however -- don't misunderstand please).

I've read everything on this site regarding the meaning of "rework" and while I can see that there are some shades of difference between industries and applications, it seems quite clear that while both 'rework' and 'repair' can apply to the manufacturing process, I see no evidence of 'rework' per se applying to post-manufacture ('repair' however clearly can apply). And I find no support whatsoever for 'rework' being equivalent to 're-repair'.

If anyone's familiar with the paragraph to which I'm referring, you'll understand why I/we don't wish to be forced into this documentation/work instruction/authorization/approval loop unnecessarily, especially since we've taken great pains thus far with our QMS to weed out any administrative busy-work.:frust:

I'd hugely appreciate any opinions out there, pro or con. I'll stand up for my position on this if needed, but I don't want to cross our advisor without being 110% certain of my position.

Thanks!
Our company sells and services (only) medical devices and we are now preparing to be certified against 13485.
Are you the authorized service company for the medical devices manufacturer within warranty and later as well ?
If so, your service and testing instructions as provided by the manufacturer will come in handy for service or re-service or re-re-service. The point made here in this clause is a strong one about any re-work not compromising on the safety and effectiveness of the medical device as regard to its intended use. You must be familier with the risk management information of the medical device to be sure that the service is being done in the defined way, any number of times.
If you are not the authorized service company of the medical device manufacturer ...?
I will have many questions and we can see how it moves further. There are other experts on medical devices who will pitch in.
 
X

XeniAnnoula

#3
Somashekar, again, thank you so much for so quickly trying to help!

Yes, we are indeed the (sole) authorized service company for this equipment in this country. Our technical support guys are manufacturer-trained and very experienced and fully equipped with manuals and support from the manufacturer. They are fully aware of any involved safety issues -- this is not a concern. We are responsible for some of the most critical equipment in the hospital and take that responsibility very seriously.

My reason for trying to clarify this issue is to keep our QMS "clean" of any unnecessary paperwork-for-the-sake-of-paperwork. We already document our interactions with our customers' equipment quite well, both on a by-case and by-customer basis, and on what we call an 'equipment record card' so that we can see all interactions with one specific piece of equipment at a single glance.

But with a good share of our overall business being service, and the very nature of that being that not all equipment problems can be solved in a single visit, I'm trying to avoid over-documenting, so I 'kick' when I think something doesn't apply and/or is covered elsewhere. Does that make sense? Going through an authorization and approval process as well as an analysis of any potential adverse effects ... and documenting all of this! ... each and every time we need to work on a specific piece of equipment more than once strikes me as insanity. But more to the point: it does not appear to me to be the intention of this part of 8.3 which refers at the top of the section to product being controlled prior to 'use or delivery'. SURELY this reference to 'product' in this particular case (section) is to tangible goods rather than 'service', no?

Please feel free to ask any questions which would clarify this for you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
Somashekar, again, thank you so much for so quickly trying to help!

Yes, we are indeed the (sole) authorized service company for this equipment in this country. Our technical support guys are manufacturer-trained and very experienced and fully equipped with manuals and support from the manufacturer. They are fully aware of any involved safety issues -- this is not a concern. We are responsible for some of the most critical equipment in the hospital and take that responsibility very seriously.

My reason for trying to clarify this issue is to keep our QMS "clean" of any unnecessary paperwork-for-the-sake-of-paperwork. We already document our interactions with our customers' equipment quite well, both on a by-case and by-customer basis, and on what we call an 'equipment record card' so that we can see all interactions with one specific piece of equipment at a single glance.

But with a good share of our overall business being service, and the very nature of that being that not all equipment problems can be solved in a single visit, I'm trying to avoid over-documenting, so I 'kick' when I think something doesn't apply and/or is covered elsewhere. Does that make sense? Going through an authorization and approval process as well as an analysis of any potential adverse effects ... and documenting all of this! ... each and every time we need to work on a specific piece of equipment more than once strikes me as insanity. But more to the point: it does not appear to me to be the intention of this part of 8.3 which refers at the top of the section to product being controlled prior to 'use or delivery'. SURELY this reference to 'product' in this particular case (section) is to tangible goods rather than 'service', no?

Please feel free to ask any questions which would clarify this for you!
Do not worry about the device or tangible product. Your product for the QMS scope is "Servicing of Medical devices" and so keep to this simply.
The manufacturer authorizes you (actually the servicing personnel) to approve after servicing and testing under normal situations. Are they also skilled and authorized to release after servicing with any concessions ? If so what are they and are they documented ?
Either he is authorised and trained on concession approval after servicing, or he is simply asked to return the device to the factory for further actions. This ends the servicing role.
All the paperwork that you normally do after servicing and the approved device servicing manual (a current controlled document from the manufacturer) will meet your requirement.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#5
it does not appear to me to be the intention of this part of 8.3 which refers at the top of the section to product being controlled prior to 'use or delivery'. SURELY this reference to 'product' in this particular case (section) is to tangible goods rather than 'service', no?
In this instance, I agree with you. My view is that the intent of "rework" pertains to manufacturing (i.e. the repair or make-good of the percentage of output that did not meet specifications after original manufacture), and not to either bespoke fabrication or servicing, for which it is normal that the original work completion may involve multiple work sessions and some "rework".
 
#6
I could see some "rework" in the service industry. For example, you replace a circuit board, but do not properly connect a ribbon wire. Two days later, the unit fails because the wire lost contact. Upon your return, you discover the improperly connected wire. Since the unit failure was due to your actions, I would consider this "rework". It might be a stretch, but is the best I can think of at the moment.
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#7
Rework is intended to br pre-market. Repair can be post-market, as clear on the note to the definition of repair - and only repair - in ISO 9001 - NOTE 1 Repair includes remedial action taken on a previously conforming product to restore it for use, for example as part of maintenance.
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#8
SURELY this reference to 'product' in this particular case (section) is to tangible goods rather than 'service', no?
Nope. Product, as per ISO 9001, is defined as the result of a process. So it can be a physical good or the intangible result of a process.

If you didn't do it already, I would suggest a good read on ISO 9000 definitions, much of the problems related to rework, repair, etc, in standards came from not using the right definition.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#9
Product, as per ISO 9001, is defined as the result of a process. So it can be a physical good or the intangible result of a process.
It's difficult to define what the process is and where rework might begin, though, if/when service includes (1) investigative diagnosis and (2) iterative change-and-test repair, such as board swapping, with no clear demarcation of the boundary between (1) and (2), and sometimes no quickly clear certainty that (2) is done until further equipment use determines that a "flaky" or occasional problem has ceased to recur.

I appreciate the nature of ISO 9001's requirements, but I think the OP has a point in regard to how to practically apply the ISO 9001 "theory", if you will, to the practical nature of their work.
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#10
It's difficult to define what the process is and where rework might begin, though, if/when service includes (1) investigative diagnosis and (2) iterative change-and-test repair, such as board swapping, with no clear demarcation of the boundary between (1) and (2), and sometimes no quickly clear certainty that (2) is done until further equipment use determines that a "flaky" or occasional problem has ceased to recur.

I appreciate the nature of ISO 9001's requirements, but I think the OP has a point in regard to how to practically apply the ISO 9001 "theory", if you will, to the practical nature of their work.
You are correct, however, I was dealing with this in my other answer, maybe I was not very clear.

In the case of the example, I don't think rework as defined in the standards applies the way the advisor is interpreting. Rework, as I understand, is focused in being applied applied pre-market (although I can think of some situations in post-market which needs rework), and service (which is related to "correct" something in the field)is post-market. So service visits are repair, as defined in the standards, not rework.


The particular requirement for rework in 8.3 of ISo 13485 is focused on the case of where your product (being a hardware, software, or service) has a non-conformity prior to being delivered, and thus need to be put into conformance before being released. This should be an uncommon situation, that's why there's very detailed requirements that you need to document and authorize and everything.


This is more clear in 21 CFR 820 where it defines rework as

(x)Rework means action taken on a nonconforming product so that it will fulfill the specified DMR requirements before it is released for distribution.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
L Need HELP with Internal Audit Program ISO 13485.2003 Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 3
R ISO 13485 Software Validation Requirements - Help needed ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Please help on ISO 13485 medical device related services Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
X Help with ISO 13485 Clause 6.4 as it applies to Medical Device Servicing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 25
G Need help in an upcoming ISO 13485 Audit ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
S Freshman needs help with ISO 13485 Audit Process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 46
R ISO 13485 Surveillance Audit Nonconformances and Report Help Needed ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
D ISO 13485 Help - Determining what processes I specifically need to document ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
K ISO 13485 Audit help needed General Auditing Discussions 20
R Help for implementing ISO 13485 (provision of software to Hospitals) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
J Need step-by-step ISO 13485 implementation help ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
E Contract manufacturer seeking help understanding ISO 13485 Validation requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
P Can somebody help me to identify the 27 ISO 13485:2003 procedures? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T Help with BS EN ISO - IEC 80079-34 2020 (Explosive atmospheres QMS) Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
C ISO/ IEC 17021 Resource requirement (need help) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
T ISO/IEC 17065 certification scheme Help Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 7
M Case study help as per ISO 9001: 2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
M Case study solution help required as per ISO 9001 : 2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
O Please, help with document on ISO/ TS 17758 and (IDF 87: 1979). Thank you. Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
A Help with Drawing Review - ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q ISO 3310 Clarification Help - Aperture sizes for sieves used for particle sorting Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
L Please help me with the process of getting ISO 9001 certified Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 15
A ISO 9001 Help - New Quality Manager - Upper Management Support Issues ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 23
S ISO 17025 - Help in Getting accreditation- Where to start from ISO 17025 related Discussions 12
D Customer Audit - Root Cause Help - ISO 9001:2008 Cl. 7.5.3 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
V Revised ISO std vs ISO13485:2003 - Help Please!!! ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S How will ISO 9001 help the machinists in a very small Machine Shop ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 23
S ISO 9001:2008 Clause 8.2.3 Monitoring and Measurement of Processes Help ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
S Informational Please help this newbie understand ISO 9001 Work Instructions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 44
Q ISO 9001 - 3 BIG questions to help a Newbie's Sanity ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
N Help me understand the ISO section 7.5.2 from API Q1 perspective Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 4
R First ISO 9001 Management Review....HELP Management Review Meetings and related Processes 7
0 The Uncertainty of an Estimate of the Bias ISO 5725-1 - Help Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 8
Q New Auditor looking for help with ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 21
P Supplier Scorecard for ISO 9001 - Help me review the draft from my purchasing team ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
R OHSAS 18001 & ISO 9001 Implementation - help! Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 7
S Help with Master Thesis focusing on ISO/TS 16949 and CSR in automotive SC IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
R ISO 9001 Implementation in the Bus/Coach Industry - Confused and Help needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
O ISO 9000 section 7.2.1(c) Compliance help needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
K Bi-Annual ISO 9001 Surveillance Audit Help ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20
C CRMs (Customer Relationship Management) to help achieve ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
T ISO 14001 Implementation Help & Question about Supplier Approval ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 5
T Design & Development in Updating Machines and Equipment - ISO 9001 Help Design and Development of Products and Processes 4
1 I don?t have any experience with ISO 9001 - Help Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 9
P ISO 9001:2008 Gap Analysis Template - Please help ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
J ISO 9001 and Improvement of Business Performance - Research help Needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
D Help with ISO 9001 Implementation in Oil Industry ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
S Incidents that occur during a Third Party Supplier Audit - Help for ISO 9001 General Auditing Discussions 23
S ISO 2859-1 or Ansi ASQ Z1.4 in using AQL or AOQL - Need Help Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
K ISO 9001 Clause 4.2.4 Control of Records - Documented Procedure help ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom