How a "Service" Nonconformance can be Documented - Nonconformance Procedure

S

somerqc

#1
Everyone,

As my background is strictly manufacturing, I have having a hard time explaining that a "service" can have a nonconforming state. I am also having a hard time incorporating this thought process into our "product" nonconforming procedure.

Can anyone give me any ideas on how a "service" nonconformance can be documented? To add insult to injury, our largest client is 98% of our service nonconformances. Unfortunately, they have implemented a system that removes our ability to log any service "exceptions" into our system (we were able to prior to this new system). Without duplicating work, we don't have access to this data. This client is governmental, they don't like sharing. Am I stuck duplicating data so I can show control of "service" nonconformances?

:mg:

John
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#2
As my background is strictly manufacturing, I have having a hard time explaining that a "service" can have a nonconforming state.
You make a hotel reservation for a non-smoking room. As you check in at the hotel, they only have smoking rooms available. You go to a fancy restaurant and the service is terrible. Your registrar sends you an auditor with an IQ slightly higher than an amoeba's IQ, besides heavy body odor. Secretly, you wish they had sent the amoeba, instead....All of these are examples of non-conforming products services.
Can anyone give me any ideas on how a "service" nonconformance can be documented?
If you let us know what kind of services the organization you work for provides, people can offer examples that are "closer to home".
 
Last edited:

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#3
I think Sidney has hit upon several excellent real-life examples, and within the witty examples, shows the challenges facing the service industry.

If quality is conformance to requirements, then you should give some thought to your requirements. With service, it gets a little more dicey, in that there is a subjective element of human interaction that may comprise your definition of quality. For example, while the temperature, taste, etc. of the steak would be to the fancy of any steak lover, The waiter was rude. how does one assess that nonconformance (if it is a nonconformance)? will that customer perceive the quality as poor or great?

I guess another element is service recovery. Is nonconformance those customers who have an unacceptable experience, but will not return, or are you only interested in those that will return?

If I am a waiter that has done a top-notch job, but the kitchen (totally out of my control) burns the customer's hamburger. But... instead of giving them a free meal, the waiter only offers to fix a new one. The customer is unhappy. Does the customer self-report the nonconformance, and how accurate is the information? Does the waiter, or the kitchen manager?

I am highly interested in this nonconformance being levied against you by this big customer, and exactly how they come about determining what is conforming and non-conforming. Do they log these to get some service recovery such as compensation, discounts, extra services, etc.?

Maybe you might consider basing your service on an easier metric such as lead-time, lowest employee turnover, longest years of service, largest market share, etc.

Just some thoughts.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#4
Everyone,

As my background is strictly manufacturing, I have having a hard time explaining that a "service" can have a nonconforming state. I am also having a hard time incorporating this thought process into our "product" nonconforming procedure.

Can anyone give me any ideas on how a "service" nonconformance can be documented? To add insult to injury, our largest client is 98% of our service nonconformances. Unfortunately, they have implemented a system that removes our ability to log any service "exceptions" into our system (we were able to prior to this new system). Without duplicating work, we don't have access to this data. This client is governmental, they don't like sharing. Am I stuck duplicating data so I can show control of "service" nonconformances?

:mg:

John
  1. Identify the requirement.
  2. Identify the failure to comply with the requirement.
  3. Write it down.
It's really no different from a nonconforming condition in a palpable product. If there is a clear requirement, it shouldn't be difficult to identify occasions when the requirement isn't met. For example, if you use a messenger service, and the requirement is that stuff will be delivered undamaged, within x hours, and your customer informs you that a package was delivered two hours late, smashed to bits, then you know the requirements weren't met.

If you're having trouble documenting any kind of nonconforming condition, it most likely means that the requirements aren't clear.
 
S

somerqc

#5
I have grasped the concept. However, our client is the reason for the non-conformance 80% of time (well, they were until they took access to the data away). Does one really write disposition "Thanks for the cash to revisit the location due to your ineptness"?

We install our customers products at retail locations. However, the majority of our issues are due to our client not telling us enough information or telling us wrong information (i.e. telling us a new store is open - we get there - barely done construction, retail location hasn't approved retail display, retail display won't fit <it is their responsibility to ensure product fits>, etc.). I feel that I would basically be documenting that our client's sales force is inept. It would basically be backup data should they ever try to blame us for poor delivery performance. In case you are wondering, each and every case is documented to them - unfortunately we don't have access to the complied data. To gain access to the data, we would have to enter the data a 2nd time. I would love to smack the client around on this, but, they are a major client and government (yes, sort of like convincing your wife/gf that football/hockey/baseball/NASCAR can be fun to watch!). In other words, efforts are better spent elsewhere. Oh ya, did I mention that we get paid again to address the nonconformance?

I guess the hardest thing I am trying to get my head around is to ensure I address all aspects of the ISO standard I will have to duplicate something I am already doing AND try to take action to prevent us from making money!

:notme:
 

Helmut Jilling

Auditor / Consultant
#6
I have grasped the concept. However, our client is the reason for the non-conformance 80% of time (well, they were until they took access to the data away). Does one really write disposition "Thanks for the cash to revisit the location due to your ineptness"?

We install our customers products at retail locations. However, the majority of our issues are due to our client not telling us enough information or telling us wrong information (i.e. telling us a new store is open - we get there - barely done construction, retail location hasn't approved retail display, retail display won't fit <it is their responsibility to ensure product fits>, etc.). I feel that I would basically be documenting that our client's sales force is inept. It would basically be backup data should they ever try to blame us for poor delivery performance. In case you are wondering, each and every case is documented to them - unfortunately we don't have access to the complied data. To gain access to the data, we would have to enter the data a 2nd time. I would love to smack the client around on this, but, they are a major client and government (yes, sort of like convincing your wife/gf that football/hockey/baseball/NASCAR can be fun to watch!). In other words, efforts are better spent elsewhere. Oh ya, did I mention that we get paid again to address the nonconformance?

I guess the hardest thing I am trying to get my head around is to ensure I address all aspects of the ISO standard I will have to duplicate something I am already doing AND try to take action to prevent us from making money!

:notme:

Perhaps you are right. Often it is the customer who is at the root cause. Government personnel can be frustrating. However, I think you are missing some opportunities here. The corrective action process is something you do to solve the causes of a problem, not something you do for ISO. Consequently, look at your own side of the fence as well. What cues are your people missing? What questions were not being asked? Did they suspect a problem and not follow through? Reading between the lines on your post suggests there is some improvement to be gained there as well.
 

RoxaneB

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#7
We track service-related complaints at my organization and classify them as either sales-based or mill-based. My site is responsible for addressing the latter. Sales (based off-site) is responsible for addressing the former.

We document them in a web-based system so that the entire organization can have a look (if they so desire) and track credits, disposition, root cause, actions taken, etc.

More often than not, a service related complaint is resolved through a credit (i.e., we pay the Customer for their inconvenience)...even if the Customer is at fault (if any of our Customers are reading this...and there are some on the Cove...don't get any ideas! I know who you are! :cool: ). However, we look at it as an opportunity to improve the system.

Let's use "Improper loading by mill" as an example. This means we didn't use the proper spacers requested by the Customer or have the proper distance between the bundles or something along those lines. This issue can resolve in potential damage to the product or impeded the Customer's ability to off-load the product from the truck.

At the end of the day, the Customer accepts the product, but they're saying that we made things difficult for them. So we promise never to do it again.

Of course, I am well aware that Murphy is a full time employee and odds are it will happen again (despite our best intentions). If we have the same complaint (not necessarily from the same Customer) within our designated frequency window (typically 3 months), eyebrows are raised as is the yellow flag.

However, if the same classification of service-mill complaint occurs within 3 months, a Preventive Action is raised (the treatment of the complaint is corrective, but we are noting an adverse trend hence the issuance of preventive) and we look at the bigger picture versus the individual complaint. It could be a computer system issue (e.g., perhaps the Customer's request for spacing is not translating onto the order) or a sales-mill communication issue (e.g., they don't like talking to us)...either way, a more indepth action plan is developed to nip this adverse trend in the bud.

Long story short...the individual complaint is logged as if it was any other complaint. Trends with service complaints result in preventive actions being initiated.
 
S

somerqc

#8
Some more info.

When we could track the data much easier, we did analyze the nonconformances on a monthly basis. There were multiple reasons (under our control) that were raised. Within 8 months, we were able to reduce our frequency to virtually zero.

The frequency of nonconformances had (remember, I don't have access to this data anymore without duplication of work)greatly decreased (less than 1% of all service orders).

Unfortunately, when we discussed the client issue with them there was little to no response (there may have been, but, no response from the client's sales force). So the same issues keep occurring. If the client does not see a benefit in addressing these issues - I am left to collect this data for ISO purposes only as it serves little to no benefit to the company!

The biggest issue is poor information from their sales staff. We must rely on them to tell us what will and won't fit in a location, whether a location is open or not, etc. We don't always have easy access to do a check to verify a location is available to that product will fit where requested. We have implemented some corrections on our part (i.e. when a certain type of product is requested at a certain type of location - we automatically change how we fulfill the order due to standard location issues). Unfortunately, this is the only consistent item we have found that we can assist in addressing.

Basically, I will have the log created and move forward.

Fortunately, we didn't get a nonconformance as we were able to prove that we were logging it until we "lost" access to compiled data (this is relatively recent). He did note it as an OFI though.
 
A

AS_QualityEngineer

#10
Seeking Procedure for - "Service" Nonconformance Procedure

Hello All

Any reference or example for Service Nonconformance Procedure?
Thanks
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B How to implement a Nonconformance System in a Service Industry ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
MarilynJ6354 Service Company Work Environment Issue - Nonconformance or not? Service Industry Specific Topics 21
J Nonconformance Elimination as a business - Service - Software Service Industry Specific Topics 3
T Price of Nonconformance (PoNC) - Telecommunications Service Industry Service Industry Specific Topics 4
W States that require service provider to have state license Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Scope for ISO 13485 Certification of a Translation Service Provider ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 17
A AS9100D - Clause 8.1 Operation - Coating service company AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
B Software service provider as critical supplier ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
chris1price Contract Sterilization Service Providers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
J EU 207/2012 E-IFU Service Video EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S How is the service life for class I reusable medical devices described in MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 7
S How is the service life described for class I reusable medical devices in MDR? Elsmar Xenforo Forum Software Instructions and Help 1
L AS9100 - Product and Service Provision 8.5.1q AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
JoCam Rental, service & installation - regulatory requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 2
E Qualification for non gmp service providers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
I Equipment service dates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
H Operational planning and product and service provision when things happen so fast ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
C One Time Service Supplier - Temperature and Humidity Testing Service ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D IEC 60601-1 - Service life testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 8
D Device functionality over service life - Objective evidence required? Design and Development of Products and Processes 10
Q ISO 9001 8.5.1 - Control of production and service performance ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
L Design & Development of a SERVICE Service Industry Specific Topics 13
N Evaluation of service providers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 2
N "Placing on the market" & "putting into service"- one time regulatory event or Continual supply event? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
samarth IVD manufacturer and service provider ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
C Quality Manager vs Warranty (service) Manager - Authorities & Responsibilities Customer Complaints 2
J Product Service after CE Certification expiration CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
T Nonconforming product at customer detected by a routine inspection by field service Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
S Service record requirements for Non-Serviceable Medical Devices CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
C Quality at Logistical Service Provider Service Industry Specific Topics 0
M Standards Subscription Service and Standards Tracking Service Pros and Cons? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
J NHS exemption - Benefits versus expectations in UK NHS service EU Medical Device Regulations 0
C ISO 9001:2015 Monitoring and measuring resources. Application a service industry ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
K Packaging and Damaged Parts returned from a Service Provider (Anodize) - Who is Responsible? Manufacturing and Related Processes 20
F 21 CFR Part 11 - Implicit requirements - Validation plan for a Software as a Service Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
M Informational From RAPS – Prep for Brexit: UK Seeks £25M Freight Service to Deliver Medicines, Devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
C Determining if Maintenance Contractor is an External Service subject to ISO 9001 Clause 8.4 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 43
W Customer Signature / Acceptance Service Reports Service Industry Specific Topics 2
T Is anyone working with N299.1 (Supply/service to nuclear power plants)? Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 0
Ed Panek Ideas to keep quotes for consulting service accurate on not inflated Consultants and Consulting 11
M Informational New Notified Body designated under the MDR – TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH Zertifizierstellen Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
V Replaced part affecting service life? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 8
A Defining Expected Service Life in Risk Management File Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 5
T Transportation - External Service Provider ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
B Will you please help me with my academic project? Repair & calibration service for test equipment ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
S Product registration platforms - A service called Licensale by Arazy Group Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 0
K How to define Expected life service life of medical device Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
A AS9100 D Counterfeit Prevention Program - We just service parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 17
W AS9120B 8.5.1 Control of Production and Service Provision AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
A ITSM (IT Service Management) Ticket Audit Template Service Industry Specific Topics 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom