T
Why do people in the quality profession continue to perpertrate the view that quality costs money by talking in terms of calculating 'the cost of quality.'
In my view, its only poor quality that costs money. Does not building good quality in, save money??
Most organisations inspect poor quality out so is not all the costs associated with inspecting poor quality out the cost of poor quality?
Why the inference that good qualkity costs money??
In my view, its only poor quality that costs money. Does not building good quality in, save money??
Most organisations inspect poor quality out so is not all the costs associated with inspecting poor quality out the cost of poor quality?
Why the inference that good qualkity costs money??
In other words, strive to shift costs from External Failure -> Internal Failure -> Appraisal -> Prevention.
Prevention costs money, but it is way cheaper than the cost of failures or appraisal (inspection).