J
We both probably agree the same thing! To do as the standard asks is always a matter of interpretation (thank God) that is why we have a job.
I was just confirming he did not need a long QAM. If one wants to add some introductory information and also a summary of what is covered then there is nothing wrong with that.
I am sure you agree in the real world the only people who really care about the QAM are the quality manager and the auditor.
Most auditors will (or should!) be more concerned about how well the system is run rather than how nice the documents look.
Anyway makes for an interesting conversation!
I was just confirming he did not need a long QAM. If one wants to add some introductory information and also a summary of what is covered then there is nothing wrong with that.
I am sure you agree in the real world the only people who really care about the QAM are the quality manager and the auditor.
Most auditors will (or should!) be more concerned about how well the system is run rather than how nice the documents look.
Anyway makes for an interesting conversation!

