How long (how often) do you check your SPC chart?

J

jackylpt

#1
Hi there,

there is a process, operator take data every hour(two shift a day, total 16 data a day) and put data in computer to draw SOC chart,

qustion1: as a quality engineer, how long do you check your SPC chart? I means one hour, half day or other? Because quality engineer also have other duty.

question2: when you find out of control, what's response do you do in this two case?
a) if process is still running(stop machine, or ???)
b) if porcess is finished now(check product in stock? or??

thanks

Michael
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#2
jackylpt said:
Hi there,

there is a process, operator take data every hour(two shift a day, total 16 data a day) and put data in computer to draw SOC chart,

qustion1: as a quality engineer, how long do you check your SPC chart? I means one hour, half day or other? Because quality engineer also have other duty.Michael
There is no general rule regarding how often a quality engineer should check control charts. It depends on a number of factors, including how concerned you might be that something is going to change. Although mine is a minority opinion, I don't believe in running control charts in perpetuity. I think they should be used to provide objective evidence that a process, when controlled and operated as designed, will be efficacious. Once that has been established, there is (generally) no good reason to do SPC forever.

jackylpt said:
question2: when you find out of control, what's response do you do in this two case?
a) if process is still running(stop machine, or ???)
b) if porcess is finished now(check product in stock? or??
In general, signs of process instability are not, in and of themselves, reason to either stop the process or start containment activities. Remember--a point beyond the +/- 3 sigma limits might be normal--only 99.73% of the population is included within the limits, and given enough time, that other .27% will appear.

The nature of the out-of-control condition should also be considered; a point outside the control limits probably represents a less alarming condition than say, seven or eight consectutive points on one side of the mean. The point is that your reaction should be rational and based on both an understanding of your process and an understanding of probability and variation.
 

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
jackylpt said:
qustion1: as a quality engineer, how long do you check your SPC chart? I means one hour, half day or other? Because quality engineer also have other duty.
If the workers have been trained and are competent in updating the chart, and know how to determine if a trend (out of control condition) has occurred, and know to contact management and the quality engineer when such a condition occurs, then there really is no reason for the quality engineer to check it. Personally, I would make sure to tour the work spaces on a periodic basis anyway, and as part of the tour be sure to check the charts. Hopefully they should be posted for all to see.
jackylpt said:
question2: when you find out of control, what's response do you do in this two case?
a) if process is still running(stop machine, or ???)
b) if porcess is finished now(check product in stock? or??
It depends. The control chart has sent you a signal that something has changed. What new risk are you encurring? If the SPC chart also includes the specifications (USL and LSL) how close are you to them? Or have you already crossed them? If the change makes the product unusable or hazardous, STOP the machine. It the change is a trend towards a problem (hopefully the case) you have time to do some investigation and perhaps finish the current batch.

By the way, I disagree with the response that once a process is in control you should stop doing SPC. Once the process is in control, a major use of SPC is checking (very inexpensively I may add) that it still is in control.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#4
Steve Prevette said:
The control chart has sent you a signal that something has changed.
Not necessarily--points outside the control limits--or other signs of statistical instability--might be "normal." As I asserted in my earlier post, given enough time, the improbable will happen.

Steve Prevette said:
By the way, I disagree with the response that once a process is in control you should stop doing SPC. Once the process is in control, a major use of SPC is checking (very inexpensively I may add) that it still is in control.
Here's the way I see it, and keep in mind that I'm not saying that ongoing SPC is unnecessary in every instance: We want people to concentrate on controlling the process. When a process is designed, parameters for its operation are established. The working hypothesis is, "If I establish parameters a, b, c... and those parameters are monitored and controlled, the process output will be in conformance." Using statistics and the scientific method, we should try to falsify the hypothesis. In other words, we should run the process, monitoring both the process controls and the output until we have credible objective evidence that the process controls don't work. If enough data has been collected and analyzed and the hypothesis has not been disproven, there is no longer a need to continue statistical analysis.
SPC, in general, should be considered a tool in the objective establishment of process controls, not an ongoing method of verifying process output.
 

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
JSW05 said:
Not necessarily--points outside the control limits--or other signs of statistical instability--might be "normal." As I asserted in my earlier post, given enough time, the improbable will happen.
True. There can and will be false alarms. But I like to use the analogy of a fire alarm going off in a building. Smart people evacuate the building as an immediate action, then check to see if the alarm was valid or false.

JSW05 said:
SPC, in general, should be considered a tool in the objective establishment of process controls, not an ongoing method of verifying process output.
I guess we'll just have to disagree on that point.
 
J

jackylpt

#6
To JSW05 and Steve

HI JSW05 and Steve,

Thank you so much for your kind opinions. I do appreciate that. :thanx:
 
R

Rob Nix

#7
You asked this question also on the ASQ discussion board, where I replied yesterday. Please see that thread also. Basically, I agree with Steve and JSW (that is, where they agree with each other :rolleyes: )
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#8
Another thing you need to consider is just where you are in your SPC journey. The others alluded to it, but I want to make certain that you understand it: The frequency that someone needs to "really" evaluate the chart depends on if you are just beginning your SPC program or if your operators very familiar with SPC.

You also need to use those charts for something, so don't just think, OK I have a chart for this shift. Use them for capability studies. Make use of the data. The charts by themselves while, helpful, can be misleading. You can get yourself down to a very small control limit area, yet really be setting yourself up for defects if the data is skewed to one or the other spec limits.
 
J

Jim Howe

#9
spc charts

Steve Prevette said:
If the workers have been trained and are competent in updating the chart, and know how to determine if a trend (out of control condition) has occurred, and know to contact management and the quality engineer when such a condition occurs, then there really is no reason for the quality engineer to check it. Personally, I would make sure to tour the work spaces on a periodic basis anyway, and as part of the tour be sure to check the charts. Hopefully they should be posted for all to see.

It depends. The control chart has sent you a signal that something has changed. What new risk are you encurring? If the SPC chart also includes the specifications (USL and LSL) how close are you to them? Or have you already crossed them? If the change makes the product unusable or hazardous, STOP the machine. It the change is a trend towards a problem (hopefully the case) you have time to do some investigation and perhaps finish the current batch.

By the way, I disagree with the response that once a process is in control you should stop doing SPC. Once the process is in control, a major use of SPC is checking (very inexpensively I may add) that it still is in control.
:agree1: Thanks Steve, I believe this is the only way charts make sense. If we wait until the QAE gets around to evaluating the charts the damage may already be done. The first line of defense is the line operator who record on the chart. Training, training and more training.
 
B

Bill Pflanz

#10
JSW05 said:
Once that has been established, there is (generally) no good reason to do SPC forever....

In general, signs of process instability are not, in and of themselves, reason to either stop the process or start containment activities. Remember--a point beyond the +/- 3 sigma limits might be normal--only 99.73% of the population is included within the limits, and given enough time, that other .27% will appear.

The nature of the out-of-control condition should also be considered; a point outside the control limits probably represents a less alarming condition than say, seven or eight consectutive points on one side of the mean. The point is that your reaction should be rational and based on both an understanding of your process and an understanding of probability and variation.
The decision to control chart a process should be dependent on how critical it is to quality and not whether it is in control at any given instance or for a long period of time. Using your example, the out of control condition may occur as a result of a change in the process. Without the control chart, it is not as likely to identify the seven or eight consecutive points or even the points outside the control limits. If your "rational" reaction is based on "an understanding of your process and an understanding of probability and variation", SPC is a valid statistical tool for continuing to monitor the process.

Bill Pflanz
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
C Packaging Long Parts Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
M Old Master Schedules - How Long to Keep? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
W How long do you keep information about equipment no longer used? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
S How long does it take to register a product with MHRA? UK Medical Device Regulations 3
Watchcat How long is this going to take? (UK & ventilators) Manufacturing and Related Processes 14
P Images of Product for Automated Process - How long to keep? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
D How long should we keep the spare parts available for our medical device, after we have stopped the production? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
R How long to wait for Notified Body Response - Potentially significant change to a medical device CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 6
1 How to measure straightness on a HEX Long Bar Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
A PFMEA - How long should the recommended actions remain in the recommended actions column? APQP and PPAP 3
M FDA News Statement from USFDA on steps to strengthen the long-term safety oversight of the Essure device Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
A Class I medical device and Category III PPE - Long length gloves EU Medical Device Regulations 5
T How long will ISO 9001:2015 Recertification Take? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Q Tracking savings - Long term projects and the day to day decisions Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 5
C How long is an OEM obligated to provide spare parts and repair EU Medical Device Regulations 2
S Record Retention - How long must a company keep the following records? Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 17
L Please help my division with quality [long] Service Industry Specific Topics 1
J How long should I have to correct an audit finding? VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 7
A How to systemically improve product quality in short-term and long-term basis? Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 1
B Short term vs Long term Capability - We ship millions of parts in a year Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 7
K Internal Audit CAR - How Long for Responses to be Received? Internal Auditing 8
A Short Term vs. Long Term SPC Study - Where is Cp and Cpk Defined Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
B Control of Duplicate Documents - Limited Scope (long) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
Proud Liberal How long does your company take to close an 8D on average? Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 12
D Long length measurement of 18" up to 100" with an accuracy of .005 min General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
S Long time for NB to review to change the classification of one of our products! CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
M Is calibration from long ago still valid on never used pipettes? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
S How long should it take to get new TS 16949 certificate? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
M How long should AS9100 Certificate issuance take? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
Marc A silk casing enables long-lasting, implantable Wi-Fi medical devices Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
L Medical Device New Product Design & Development- How long does this process take you? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
G SDS (Safety Data Sheets) Records - When and how long? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 8
B Long Term Process Capability from miltiple Machines and Fixtures Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 3
O Takt Time Calculation for Long Runner Product Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 5
W AS9100C registration - How long does the system have to run before initial audit? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
M Corrective action on Non-conformances from a long time ago ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
A Pre-clinical Animal Studies for long term implantable medical devices EU Medical Device Regulations 5
R Long Range OC Curves - Acceptance Sampling Switching Rules Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
kedarg6500 Sample Size for Short Term & Long Term Process Capability Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
V How long can a development stage incident be open? Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 4
D How long must we provide service parts to Ford? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
S What documents/records should we be retaining and for how long? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
AnaMariaVR2 Dirty Medicine - Long-term criminal fraud at Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 5
R Does long-term body worn medical monitoring device need to meet IEC 60601-1-11? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
Wes Bucey Discrimination against long term unemployed Career and Occupation Discussions 2
C How long does AS9100 QMS need to be in place before the Audit? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 13
5 5S Coordinator (Long-winded) Job Title Career and Occupation Discussions 8
B Management Review Meetings too Long - How to Shorten and Improve Effectiveness Management Review Meetings and related Processes 7
L How long can the sample for Bio-Burden Test be kept? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
D ECG Electrodes - Duration of Use (How long they are expected to stay on the patient) Other US Medical Device Regulations 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom