J
I've never heard of an internal auditor auditing the QM.
Hmm, let's see. Audit question: does this section of the manual address the requirements of <insert clause number/s>.
Finding: why yes it does! (Now there's a coincidence.)
Pointless activity that adds no value
.Whereas if we're talking auding process/procedure etc. written in the QM to find out if practice is actually matching theory... yes, that's why we do it. And just because someone wrote it doesn't mean they can't audit it.