J
John C
We have a complex, multifunctional process which was dinged for insufficient documentation by our registrar. Then the manager of that process left and it was dropped on another guy who sees it as a small fraction of his responsibilities and firmly believes that he is only going through the motions of developing the documentation to satisfy the registrar auditor. He knows about documentation; "the identification of responsibilities, tie down the process, basis of continuous improvement, objective evidence, etc, etc".
"Loada rubbish" he says. Most of them think it but he says it out. (maybe he believes, like most, that it is necessary in other areas, but not in his - presumably because he is the manager - he knows what's going on, it's too flexible to really tie down, etc, etc.)
I could push him under a truck. But wouldn't it be great to convert him? Like St Paul, he would be the scourge of the unbelievers if we could ever bring him over.
On the positive side; You can't argue with a person who pays lip service and does nothing. Maybe you can get to grips with someone who is willing to stand their ground and rubbish the whole process, but you'd need a good argument.
Any suggestions? miracles? bolts of lightening?
thanks and rgds, John C
[This message has been edited by John C (edited 01 June 1999).]
"Loada rubbish" he says. Most of them think it but he says it out. (maybe he believes, like most, that it is necessary in other areas, but not in his - presumably because he is the manager - he knows what's going on, it's too flexible to really tie down, etc, etc.)
I could push him under a truck. But wouldn't it be great to convert him? Like St Paul, he would be the scourge of the unbelievers if we could ever bring him over.
On the positive side; You can't argue with a person who pays lip service and does nothing. Maybe you can get to grips with someone who is willing to stand their ground and rubbish the whole process, but you'd need a good argument.
Any suggestions? miracles? bolts of lightening?
thanks and rgds, John C
[This message has been edited by John C (edited 01 June 1999).]