How to document a Patient Outcome claim for a Class I device?

K

kongde

#1
My company markets a Class I medical device. If we want to claim (in marketing material) that our device improves patient outcomes, what sort of data or documentation is required to back up that claim?

All the clinical study guidance on the FDA website seems to be geared toward higher class devices. Thanks for your help.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
M

MIREGMGR

#2
Re: Performance claim on Class I device

A claim is a claim. There are no lower standards for FDA Class I devices.
 
J

Julie O

#3
Re: Performance claim on Class I device

You have to have data that shows it improves patient outcomes. I'm not sure exactly what you are asking. Are you asking if you need to conduct a study?
 
J

Julie O

#5
Re: Performance claim on Class I device

A claim is a claim. There are no lower standards for FDA Class I devices.
The "standard" is simply that you need to have data that are adequate to support your claim.

kongde is probably correct that FDA's clinical study guidance is geared toward higher risk devices, because manufacturers of Class I devices rarely have to conduct a study to meet this standard. There is usually enough clinical data already available to support the claims, usually in peer-reviewed publications. The data usually do not need be data collected with your specific device (although that would be very nice), but could be data for any device that falls under the same classification regulation/product code. In this case, the EU guidance on Clinical Evaluation Reports (MEDDEV 2.7.1) might be a better guidance, if you can make sense of it, which I am still working on, all these years later.

If no such data exist, then that's unusually bad luck for a Class I.

In that case, a clinical study may be necessary, and the information in the existing guidances regarding protocol design, sample size justification, monitoring, data analysis, etc, would indeed apply equally to Class I, at least in theory. In practice, FDA's expectations will usually be somewhat lower across the board. This is because it is a low-risk device, and the reasons FDA classified it as low risk in the first place will usually be reasons that FDA will feel more comfortable with a less robust clinical trial than it would be looking for to support claims about a Class II or III device.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mihzago

Trusted Information Resource
#6
be careful about making the claim that you do not cross the boundary of your clearance. I don't know what your device is, so my comment may not apply but Class I devices typically have very broad indications for use. So when you make an outcome claim in relation to a specific condition it may push you outside the classification/product code your product is in.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Master Document Register Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
M Preparing a document for Raw Material of Medical Device EU Medical Device Regulations 1
R Regulations on Controlled Document Size (Paper Size) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
M Document Architecture ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
cgaro62 Using internal audits as part of document reviews Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 21
J Training on the importance of Document Control Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
Ed Panek External Standards List - Should this document include previously revised standards? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
H Document retention period Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
S Document Notes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
M ISO 13485 and document control for programs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Ed Panek MR Mandate Document EU Medical Device Regulations 1
C Document Index Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
K ASME, ANSI, ASTM and similar specifications and their requirements for document control. Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
H If we use agile - do we still need to document TF as a waterfall just for the notified bodies need? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
B Document Issued with incorrect Document number code Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
J Requirement for Signature on Document Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 13
J Document Control Metrics Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
A Document Review and Document Approval --- 2 Signatures needed acc. §820.40? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance document to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
I Document Control Software Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
K 25-year lifetime of medical device - document storage period EU Medical Device Regulations 1
J UDI - Where to document it? EU Medical Device Regulations 8
T Controlling Expandable Forms in Paper-Based Document Control System Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
S Changing revision status of a reviewed document Manufacturing and Related Processes 11
shimonv Document Control Procedure Header Content Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
Q Document ownerships Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 15
E Document Change Request forms (or no forms)? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
O Any info on release date of FDA “Computer Software Assurance for Manufacturing and Quality System Software” document? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
B Document Approval Matrix Benchmarking Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
J Document Approval Signature Order Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
L How to add exemption or statement to control of document procedure? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M What is the proper way to document measurements Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
P Equipment 21 CFR 820.70(g) - User Requirements Document for Off the shelf equipment 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 7
B Do IFU designs have to be document controlled under ISO 13485? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
C Certificate of Conformance Form - COC for each customer a controlled document? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
A Document "Correspondence IATF 16949 vs ISO13485" available? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
R Document Retention - Discard hard-copies after scanning? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
P Mylar plot suppliers in accordance with D6-51991 document AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
A Document Change Notice vs complete System re-write Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
Q Document approval through SharePoint (without signature) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
S What is considered a "core algorithm"? (From an FDA guidance document) Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
U Document Approval - Software company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
O Please, help with document on ISO/ TS 17758 and (IDF 87: 1979). Thank you. Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
K Proper document of SMPS used in infant warmer for IEC 60601-1 testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
I Nitpicking on document released dates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
I Document Control on Log Files ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q Refusal to Document Complaints Customer Complaints 39
Q Tracking Procedure Revisions (Document Control) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9

Similar threads

Top Bottom