How to document a Patient Outcome claim for a Class I device?

K

kongde

#1
My company markets a Class I medical device. If we want to claim (in marketing material) that our device improves patient outcomes, what sort of data or documentation is required to back up that claim?

All the clinical study guidance on the FDA website seems to be geared toward higher class devices. Thanks for your help.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
M

MIREGMGR

#2
Re: Performance claim on Class I device

A claim is a claim. There are no lower standards for FDA Class I devices.
 
J

Julie O

#3
Re: Performance claim on Class I device

You have to have data that shows it improves patient outcomes. I'm not sure exactly what you are asking. Are you asking if you need to conduct a study?
 
J

Julie O

#5
Re: Performance claim on Class I device

A claim is a claim. There are no lower standards for FDA Class I devices.
The "standard" is simply that you need to have data that are adequate to support your claim.

kongde is probably correct that FDA's clinical study guidance is geared toward higher risk devices, because manufacturers of Class I devices rarely have to conduct a study to meet this standard. There is usually enough clinical data already available to support the claims, usually in peer-reviewed publications. The data usually do not need be data collected with your specific device (although that would be very nice), but could be data for any device that falls under the same classification regulation/product code. In this case, the EU guidance on Clinical Evaluation Reports (MEDDEV 2.7.1) might be a better guidance, if you can make sense of it, which I am still working on, all these years later.

If no such data exist, then that's unusually bad luck for a Class I.

In that case, a clinical study may be necessary, and the information in the existing guidances regarding protocol design, sample size justification, monitoring, data analysis, etc, would indeed apply equally to Class I, at least in theory. In practice, FDA's expectations will usually be somewhat lower across the board. This is because it is a low-risk device, and the reasons FDA classified it as low risk in the first place will usually be reasons that FDA will feel more comfortable with a less robust clinical trial than it would be looking for to support claims about a Class II or III device.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mihzago

Trusted Information Resource
#6
be careful about making the claim that you do not cross the boundary of your clearance. I don't know what your device is, so my comment may not apply but Class I devices typically have very broad indications for use. So when you make an outcome claim in relation to a specific condition it may push you outside the classification/product code your product is in.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
E Do anyone have document of automotive production risk and control of risk? Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 1
Q Document representation ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
J Document Control of Online Management Software ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
W Document control Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
D Increasing efficiency - Capt. Proj. Document Review Matrix Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
A ISO 9001:2015 8.5.6 and 7.5.3 Document Control Questions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
qualprod Sheets into a spreadsheet document control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
J Document Changes that don't have to be approved Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 11
D Electronic Document Management System ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
M Document Control - Applying Suitable Identification to Obsolete Documents ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D Document Control Question involving DocuSign US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
M Document Control ISO and FDA ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
D Document Change Approval ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
R Does anyone use iQMS for their ISO based document control? Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
C Document Identification Question ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
B Document retention Policy for Japan's PMDA Japan Medical Device Regulations 1
B Document Retention Policy for NMPA China Medical Device Regulations 1
B Document Retention period for MHRA submission UK Medical Device Regulations 0
A If document coding is change will there be a revision Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
S Document numbering question? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
R Quality policy review document IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
dpenbert AS9100 7.5.3 - Manual Document Control AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
S Software design document NMPA guidance and consultant China Medical Device Regulations 4
qualprod Is it worth to document all the processes? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
S Help in document control procedure Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 14
P Which MDCG Document should I use for PMS Plan and PSUR? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
N API Q1, Management of Change & Document Change Request Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 4
J Project management Document. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
S Master Document Register Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
M Preparing a document for Raw Material of Medical Device EU Medical Device Regulations 1
R Regulations on Controlled Document Size (Paper Size) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
M Document Architecture ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
cgaro62 Using internal audits as part of document reviews Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 21
J Training on the importance of Document Control Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
Ed Panek External Standards List - Should this document include previously revised standards? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
H Document retention period Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
S Document Notes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
M ISO 13485 and document control for programs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Ed Panek MR Mandate Document EU Medical Device Regulations 1
C Document Index Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
K ASME, ANSI, ASTM and similar specifications and their requirements for document control. Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
H If we use agile - do we still need to document TF as a waterfall just for the notified bodies need? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
B Document Issued with incorrect Document number code Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
J Requirement for Signature on Document Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 13
J Document Control Metrics Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
A Document Review and Document Approval --- 2 Signatures needed acc. §820.40? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance document to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
I Document Control Software Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
K 25-year lifetime of medical device - document storage period EU Medical Device Regulations 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom