How to Handle an Invalid Customer Complaint?

K

KELVIN

#1
Hello Members...

I've received a customer complaint on the printing defects-discoloration on the label.He has requested 8D report because of they have found 3 pcs defect from 10000 pcs ~ 0.03%. See attached Photo.

In fact , this cosmetic defect is not likely to reduce the usability of the product for its intended purpose such as identification.The end user still able to identify the product & defect is not visible under normal viewing inspection guideline.Moreover, our contract only specify AQL 0.65 , not 100% inspection plan or 100% detection service.

In view of the point above, pls advise your thoughts should I reply my customer that pls UAI the parts & would not accept the 8D report due to the defects still acceptable which low consumer risk as well.Note: My customer is a new SQE who taking care for mechanical commodity. I was thinking to educate this customer abt the cost of doing the business.If you pay peanuts,dun expect you got the six sigma vendor , or you must be sick sigma customer.

Thanks for the advise that how you deal with this kind of invalid customer complaint.:thanx:

Best Regards,
Kelvin
 

Attachments

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#2
Re: How to handle invalid customer complaint?

Hello Members...

I've received a customer complaint on the printing defects-discoloration on the label.He has requested 8D report because of they have found 3 pcs defect from 10000 pcs ~ 0.03%. See attached Photo.

In fact , this cosmetic defect is not likely to reduce the usability of the product for its intended purpose such as identification.The end user still able to identify the product & defect is not visible under normal viewing inspection guideline.Moreover, our contract only specify AQL 0.65 , not 100% inspection plan or 100% detection service.

In view of the point above, pls advise your thoughts should I reply my customer that pls UAI the parts & would not accept the 8D report due to the defects still acceptable which low consumer risk as well.Note: My customer is a new SQE who taking care for mechanical commodity. I was thinking to educate this customer abt the cost of doing the business.If you pay peanuts,dun expect you got the six sigma vendor , or you must be sick sigma customer.

Thanks for the advise that how you deal with this kind of invalid customer complaint.:thanx:

Best Regards,
Kelvin
Many companies have painted themselves into a corner by requiring CA every time a defect is discovered, and the same companies often don't allow reasonable people to use their own discretion.

If the "defect" in question really isn't a defect in view of the documented specifications, you're within your rights to diplomatically point that out to the customer, and ask for the CAR to be rescinded. You should inform the customer that you're glad they notified you, but that CA shouldn't be required under the circumstances, and will not be cost-effective. If they balk, you can suggest revisiting the specifications and the pricing.
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#3
Re: How to handle invalid customer complaint?

Hello Members...

I've received a customer complaint on the printing defects-discoloration on the label.He has requested 8D report because of they have found 3 pcs defect from 10000 pcs ~ 0.03%. See attached Photo.

In fact , this cosmetic defect is not likely to reduce the usability of the product for its intended purpose such as identification.The end user still able to identify the product & defect is not visible under normal viewing inspection guideline.Moreover, our contract only specify AQL 0.65 , not 100% inspection plan or 100% detection service.

In view of the point above, pls advise your thoughts should I reply my customer that pls UAI the parts & would not accept the 8D report due to the defects still acceptable which low consumer risk as well.Note: My customer is a new SQE who taking care for mechanical commodity. I was thinking to educate this customer abt the cost of doing the business.If you pay peanuts,dun expect you got the six sigma vendor , or you must be sick sigma customer.

Thanks for the advise that how you deal with this kind of invalid customer complaint.:thanx:

Best Regards,
Kelvin
hmmmm....it appears that the label was not the color that the customer asked for. That makes it nonconforming. It doesn't matter if it is usable or not. If I order a red car and I get an orange one off the line, I am not going to take it.

Now, the place where your arguments come into play would be in determining just how much of a monetary settlement is called for. Do not, I repeat, do not confuse investigating and resolving quality problems (wrong color) with claim resolution ($ exchanged)

If your contract allows for a certain percentage of variance, then you might have a leg to stand on, but in my world, if you don't give the customer what you promised, you are going to have to credit him for what was not right. (and maybe more if you screw up his world bad enough)

Just remember that you decide when to do a corrective action, based on the importance to you and your customers. But, you do (when requested by a customer especially) need to perform some sort of investigation. How can you assess what this problem means without figuring out how, where, why, when it happens?
 
Last edited:

Coury Ferguson

Moderator here to help
Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
Re: How to handle invalid customer complaint?

hmmmm....it appears that the label was not the color that the customer asked for. That makes it nonconforming. It doesn't matter if it is usable or not. If I order a red car and I get an orange one off the line, I am not going to take it.
That is true and I agree. The customer ordered a specific type/color and it did not meet their needs/expectations. It is nonconforming.

Now, the place where your arguments come into play would be in determining just how much of a monetary settlement is called for. Do not, I repeat, do not confuse investigating and resolving quality problems (wrong color) with claim resolution ($ exchanged)
I think the settlement would be upon the supplier to reduce the costs, if it is accepted, by the customer.

If your contract allows for a certain percentage of variance, then you might have a leg to stand on, but in my world, if you don't give the customer what you promised, you are going to have to credit him for what was not right. (and maybe more if you screw up his world bad enough)
I totally agree with this.
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
Hello Members...

I've received a customer complaint on the printing defects-discoloration on the label.He has requested 8D report because of they have found 3 pcs defect from 10000 pcs ~ 0.03%. See attached Photo.

In fact , this cosmetic defect is not likely to reduce the usability of the product for its intended purpose such as identification.The end user still able to identify the product & defect is not visible under normal viewing inspection guideline.Moreover, our contract only specify AQL 0.65 , not 100% inspection plan or 100% detection service.

In view of the point above, pls advise your thoughts should I reply my customer that pls UAI the parts & would not accept the 8D report due to the defects still acceptable which low consumer risk as well.Note: My customer is a new SQE who taking care for mechanical commodity. I was thinking to educate this customer abt the cost of doing the business.If you pay peanuts,dun expect you got the six sigma vendor , or you must be sick sigma customer.

Thanks for the advise that how you deal with this kind of invalid customer complaint.:thanx:

Best Regards,
Kelvin
There is something wrong somewhere and believe me, instructions for use is an important requirement per regulatory. More important is the customer to you. A frank discussions across will solve it in a simple way. If I were you, I would give a lot of weightage to customer's perception first then to the actual problem. Customer complaints are problems and they can be solved, but get one up in customer satisfaction. Good luck.
 
Last edited:

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#6
I'm old and apparently have lost my inspector's eye due to age and encroaching senility. I don't see where the PP slide helps me understand the distinction between requested color and delivered color.

What was the specification on the customer order for the label color? Did it specify a color on a Pantone scale? What is the difference between the order and the nonconforming labels? What inspection system does the customer use to make the determination? What does the supplier use? Did they agree (Contract Review!) on how to inspect? Was color gradation one of the critical characteristics? What is the cost difference between full-fledged root cause investigation and CA report versus saying, "Oops, sorry! Let me rebate the cost of the nonconforming labels from this shipment and I will add an inspection step to assure no miscolored labels reach you on future deliveries/orders." ?

As others have written, EVERY nonconformance does not necessarily require a full root cause and corrective action process, but bureaucrats within organizations are not normally allowed discretion on gray areas and everything must be black and white (like kindergartens expelling students for bringing rubber "Pirate's of the Caribbean" swords to school as part of a Zero Tolerance policy.) If such is the case with this customer, it might be better to suck it up on this instance, but ensure ALL future contracts contain exculpatory clauses about non-cost-effective re-inspections and root cause/corrective action investigations and reports.
 

Manix

Get Involved!!!
Trusted Information Resource
#7
I would agree with the majority of points so far, but do be careful in terming a customer complaint "Invalid". The "Voice of your Customer" is letting you know something is not as they were expecting and although it may appear trivial, it is as valid as any other comment the customer makes.

Your problem may well be easily fixed, but somewhere in your system there may well be an issue in terms of either predicted the failure, preventing it and/or protecting your customer from it (I have swallowed a GM drill down training manual today), but as you have said, contracted acceptance values, although "old hat", may well be your acceptable defence.

Finally, just learn from it. It may cost but what savings can you make from the added knowledge of investigating the issue.

Although it is important to appease the customer, shallow gestures rarely work in enhancing reputation. Be grateful you have this added in sight into your customers expectations, it takes the guesswork and therefore risk out of your process if followed up.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#8
I would agree with the majority of points so far, but do be careful in terming a customer complaint "Invalid". The "Voice of your Customer" is letting you know something is not as they were expecting and although it may appear trivial, it is as valid as any other comment the customer makes.

Your problem may well be easily fixed, but somewhere in your system there may well be an issue in terms of either predicted the failure, preventing it and/or protecting your customer from it (I have swallowed a GM drill down training manual today), but as you have said, contracted acceptance values, although "old hat", may well be your acceptable defence.

Finally, just learn from it. It may cost but what savings can you make from the added knowledge of investigating the issue.

Although it is important to appease the customer, shallow gestures rarely work in enhancing reputation. Be grateful you have this added in sight into your customers expectations, it takes the guesswork and therefore risk out of your process if followed up.
It's easy to agree in general with all of this, but what's missing is that the reality of the situation is probably not what it appears. "The customer" is not a single entity with opinions, perceptions and inviolable standards. The customer is an amalgam of people who might very well have different opinions, perceptions and standards, depending on who you talk to, and in what situation.

In this case, it's quite possible that an inspector or operator noticed what he/she felt might be a problem, and rejected the parts, with documentation. Thus begins a chain of overly-constrained decisions: "ISO says" we need to send these back to the supplier, and open a CAR. No one is allowed to look at the situation rationally. The supplier QA person, who is probably already overburdened with what might be charitably characterized as "non value-added" tasks, realizes that (A) the specified requirements haven't actually been breached; (B) there is no possible cost-effective preventive action that can be taken, and (C) he can't reason with the customer.

Sometimes the "Voice of the Customer" is babbling incoherently, or making patently unreasonable demands. Customers need to explicitly tell their suppliers what's required, and not invoke artificial "corrective" measures when what they get is what they asked for.
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#9
It's easy to agree in general with all of this, but what's missing is that the reality of the situation is probably not what it appears. "The customer" is not a single entity with opinions, perceptions and inviolable standards. The customer is an amalgam of people who might very well have different opinions, perceptions and standards, depending on who you talk to, and in what situation.

In this case, it's quite possible that an inspector or operator noticed what he/she felt might be a problem, and rejected the parts, with documentation. Thus begins a chain of overly-constrained decisions: "ISO says" we need to send these back to the supplier, and open a CAR. No one is allowed to look at the situation rationally. The supplier QA person, who is probably already overburdened with what might be charitably characterized as "non value-added" tasks, realizes that (A) the specified requirements haven't actually been breached; (B) there is no possible cost-effective preventive action that can be taken, and (C) he can't reason with the customer.

Sometimes the "Voice of the Customer" is babbling incoherently, or making patently unreasonable demands. Customers need to explicitly tell their suppliers what's required, and not invoke artificial "corrective" measures when what they get is what they asked for.
True, but it often requires involving folks high up the food chain in each organization before we reach someone who can step outside of the "constraints" and make a rational decision about what is REALLY needed.

No low level employee in his right mind will alienate ANY customer without the backing of his own top managers. And telling a customer (through channels) that its policy is "wrong-headed" will go a long way toward alienating that customer from top to bottom level.

In business, discretion IS the better part of valor, especially when you are not high on the food chain in either customer or supplier. I have also seen instances where simple-minded SQEs or other low- to mid-level employees have overstepped their bounds and alienated critical suppliers, only to have their heads chopped off by higher ranking folk at the customer when a call comes from a supplier's CEO to their CEO telling him, "You've breached the contract. We're invoking the cancellation clause. Want a new contract at twice the price?" (It happens. I was the supplier CEO who made the call! Actually, it was a purchasing agent who unilaterally decided to extend payment from thirty to ninety days who provoked the phone call.)
 

Manix

Get Involved!!!
Trusted Information Resource
#10
It's easy to agree in general with all of this, but what's missing is that the reality of the situation is probably not what it appears. "The customer" is not a single entity with opinions, perceptions and inviolable standards. The customer is an amalgam of people who might very well have different opinions, perceptions and standards, depending on who you talk to, and in what situation.

In this case, it's quite possible that an inspector or operator noticed what he/she felt might be a problem, and rejected the parts, with documentation. Thus begins a chain of overly-constrained decisions: "ISO says" we need to send these back to the supplier, and open a CAR. No one is allowed to look at the situation rationally. The supplier QA person, who is probably already overburdened with what might be charitably characterized as "non value-added" tasks, realizes that (A) the specified requirements haven't actually been breached; (B) there is no possible cost-effective preventive action that can be taken, and (C) he can't reason with the customer.

Sometimes the "Voice of the Customer" is babbling incoherently, or making patently unreasonable demands. Customers need to explicitly tell their suppliers what's required, and not invoke artificial "corrective" measures when what they get is what they asked for.
It quite possibly is the case and I would expect the supplier to conclude this and present a reasonable case to the customer of his conclusions. However, without a detailed knowledge of the fault, the customer or indeed the OP's company and it's relationship with the customer, I cannot assume any such situation.

My point was not that the customer has a single voice and their requirements are always clear and final, but that a complaint, no matter how obscure should not be dismissed as "invalid". If nothing else, the situation you talk about teaches us that the customer is a babbling mess of confusing and sometimes unknown requirements.

If that babbling mess represents a significant portion of our Christmas bonus, then the response we give should be given as such. It's a difficult and delicate situation, but although it maybe easy, I do agree with most of the posts, but the actual response of the OP to the customer has lie with the OP, we are not armed with enough facts. We can only give opinions and I think a reasonable balance is what these threads are for.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
K Different Indications for Use in Different Countries -- how to handle IFU? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 4
K How to handle GTINs for different configurations of one device with one part number? Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
I How to handle pending FSN when incident happens? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Jimmy123 Process disturbances and the repair - How do you handle this risk in your company? FMEA and Control Plans 18
GoSpeedRacer How to handle operator involvement in the non conformance ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
A How to Handle Documented Information in an online database for ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
O How will you handle Clause 6.1 - Risks and Opportunities for AS9100 Rev. D Auditors? Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 22
V Systems to Handle Development and Batch Analysis in same Laboratory Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
dubrizo How do you handle damaged IM&TE in your organization? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
D MDD Classification of Bone Saw Handle ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
1 How to handle Nononformances in Clincal Manufacturing ? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
R How do we handle Training during transition and overlap from one system to other ? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
Q How to handle different voltages for different countries Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
A How to handle complaints after end of specified medical device life-time ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M How does Australia handle products that are EU PPE, but Australia Medical Devices? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 7
C How to handle this Inspection conflict? Second Shift Inspector? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Q How to handle customer request for changing specifications 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T How to handle Demo Units during an ISO 9001 Audit General Auditing Discussions 3
C ISO 9001 Nonconformances an how to handle them ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
D How to handle a blood stained GMP document ? Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 6
T How to handle 510(K) submisison in 2014 when the Fees were paid in FY13 ? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
C How to handle Action Results in a new FMEA Review once we have a new RPN? FMEA and Control Plans 1
Mikishots How to handle CAR (Corrective Action Request) Scope vs. Timely Response Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
J Quality Procedure to handle some standard Medical Device Processes Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
L How to handle a Business Shutdown - Business Dissolution 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
D Plan & Procedure to handle a Product that's being Withdrawn from the Market 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
J Can you handle passivated parts without wearing gloves? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
A How to handle the various Document Revisions Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
N How to handle Quality and Safety Deficiencies ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
L Client that refuses to help - How to handle ? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
C How to handle Outsourcing with Same Site - Separate Cert ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
B How to handle Medical Device Emergency Software Releases Software Quality Assurance 4
B How to handle/follow supervisor and department head with different supervisory style? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 7
Z If this is a Nonconforming Product (Service) under clause 8.3? How do we handle it? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
D Responsibility of Distributor for Customer Complaints - How should we handle this Customer Complaints 5
R How to Handle 'Scrap and Replace' of Non-Conforming Products Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
B Upper Management makes changes to a report - How do I handle this? Six Sigma 12
J SOP for How to Handle an Investigation wanted Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
J AS9100 C - 7.5.1.3 - How do you handle Production Equipment Maintenance? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
J Seeking advice on how to handle a Special Process Nonconformance AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 12
M How to handle the task of Organizing a Regulatory File Room Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
V ISO 26262 - How to handle OEM ASIL A (Automotive Software Integrity Requirements) Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
M How to handle Rejections of a Internal NCR event Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
G Manufacturing Process Subcontracted - How do I handle Cl. 7.5? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 16
P How to handle Out of Tolerance during Calibrations and exceeded Alert Action Limits Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
M The importance of Document Control? How do you handle your Document Control? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
R How do you handle 'Contaminated Wood Pallets'? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 16
L Quality Objectives - How various device companies handle "Quality Objectives" ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
A How does your registrar handle 2 certificates, one for AS9100 and one for ISO9001? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 18
Le Chiffre Great article on how to handle continuous improvement Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom