How to satisfy clause 5.7.1.5 process validation for valve production API 6D

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Thee Bouyyy

Multiple Personalities
#2
Hi @badidi, Your question seems to difficult to understand. You have to tell me first that which processes you have already identified for the processes that require validation for valve manufacturing.

E.g. NDT examination like LP, MPI, UT, X-Ray, Welding, Salt Bath Nitriding, Blasting, Painting, Hard Chrome Plating, Local PWHT requires validation.

These process validation records must contain the following information as applicable:

1. Written procedure (specification) about respective process
2. Required equipment to carry out respective process
3. Qualification of personnel who will be performing the process
4. Use of specific methods including identified operating parameters
5. Identification of acceptance criteria
6. Re-validation
7. Records that provides evidence of conformity to requirements.

When you outsource these processes, you have to carry out assessment of supplier for understanding supplier capabilities, available equipment and resources at supplier end for carry out process.

Thanks and have a nice day ahead.
 

Thee Bouyyy

Multiple Personalities
#4
You want me to give one of the example from Magnetic Particle Testing/ Ultrasonic Testing/ Radiography Testing/ Liquid Penetrate Testing? For better understanding or you understood by Post #2?
 

Thee Bouyyy

Multiple Personalities
#6
Example # Validation of Magnetic Particle Examination in line with Clause number 5.7.1.5 of API Specification Q1 - 9th Edition with addendum 2 #

a) Required Equipment - Electromagnetic Yoke
b) Qualification of personnel - NDT level I or NDT level II or NDT level III for performance of magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure. NDT level II or level III for interpretation and evaluation of indications observed during magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure.
c) Use of specific methods including identified operating parameters - Continuous wet fluorescent magnetic particle examination with electromagnetic yoke technique.
d-1) Identification of acceptance criteria - Sufficient magnetic field must be established so that indication on CX-230 Shim shall be achieved while performing magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure.
d-2) Requirements of planned results - Sufficient magnetic field strength must be established so that indication on CX-230 shim shall be achieved while performing magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure.
d-3) Condition for acceptance of procedure validation - Achievement of planned results mentioned above. Establishment of sufficient magnetic field strength so that indication on CX-230 shim shall be achieved while performing magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure.
d-4) Evidence of successful achievement of planned results - Mentioned documented procedure for magnetic particle examination was validated on 11-23-2021 for achievement of indications on CX-230 type of shim on grinded surface, on machined surface as well as on weld surface prepared with wire brush. This concludes successful validation of mentioned procedure.
e) Requirement for records - The records for achievement of planned results and hence successful validation has developed on 11-23-2021.
f) Revalidation - Upon revision of mentioned magnetic particle examination procedure, validation records shall be reviewed by NDT level III for requirements of revalidation. If no revalidation will required, then the same will be documented in the revised magnetic particle examination procedure with revision details.

Hope this will give you the guidance for rest of your identified processes that require validation in line with clause 5.7.1.5. Good Night Pal..
 
#8
Example # Validation of Magnetic Particle Examination in line with Clause number 5.7.1.5 of API Specification Q1 - 9th Edition with addendum 2 #

a) Required Equipment - Electromagnetic Yoke
b) Qualification of personnel - NDT level I or NDT level II or NDT level III for performance of magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure. NDT level II or level III for interpretation and evaluation of indications observed during magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure.
c) Use of specific methods including identified operating parameters - Continuous wet fluorescent magnetic particle examination with electromagnetic yoke technique.
d-1) Identification of acceptance criteria - Sufficient magnetic field must be established so that indication on CX-230 Shim shall be achieved while performing magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure.
d-2) Requirements of planned results - Sufficient magnetic field strength must be established so that indication on CX-230 shim shall be achieved while performing magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure.
d-3) Condition for acceptance of procedure validation - Achievement of planned results mentioned above. Establishment of sufficient magnetic field strength so that indication on CX-230 shim shall be achieved while performing magnetic particle examination as per documented procedure.
d-4) Evidence of successful achievement of planned results - Mentioned documented procedure for magnetic particle examination was validated on 11-23-2021 for achievement of indications on CX-230 type of shim on grinded surface, on machined surface as well as on weld surface prepared with wire brush. This concludes successful validation of mentioned procedure.
e) Requirement for records - The records for achievement of planned results and hence successful validation has developed on 11-23-2021.
f) Revalidation - Upon revision of mentioned magnetic particle examination procedure, validation records shall be reviewed by NDT level III for requirements of revalidation. If no revalidation will required, then the same will be documented in the revised magnetic particle examination procedure with revision details.

Hope this will give you the guidance for rest of your identified processes that require validation in line with clause 5.7.1.5. Good Night Pal..
This is so perfectly written as per Q1 clauses 5.7.1.5. First I was confuse to figure out your numbering system as a) to f), later on I realized that you have used this numbering system just to match with clause 5.7.1.5, right ?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
I How to satisfy with AS9100 Clause 8.4.3 a, Information for external providers? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 24
D Documentation used to satisfy ISO 9001:2008 Clause 7.3 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
J How can we satisfy TS 16949 clause 4.2.3.1 Engineering Specifications IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A What would we do to satisfy ISO 17020:1998 Clause 14.2 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
Q ISO 9001 Clause 7.6 - Computer software to satisfy the intended application Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 8
K Identifying production dies to satisfy the 7.5.4 Customer Property clause ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
K How can we satisfy TS16949 Clause 8.2.2.3 Product Audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
K How can we satisfy TS 16949 Clause 7.1.1 - Quality Plan - Visteon Supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
J Statistical Data Analysis - How to satisfy ISO 9001 : 2000, Clause 8 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
N Customer Satisfaction - How to satisfy sub clause 5.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
A ISO 9000 Clause 4.2.2 - Interactions Between Processes - How do you satisfy this? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 25
Z What are the SPC Requirements to satisfy clause 4.20? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
A How to satisfy the "Interested Party" Management Review Requirement ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
M Does a process map satisfy 21 CFR 820.20(d) (Quality Plan)? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
Q The ability of computer software to satisfy the intended application ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
M ISO 14971, IEC 60601 Satisfy 98/37/EC, 2006/95/EC, 2004/108/EC Directives? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 3
H Form that will satisfy Design Review and Design Verification Requirements (7.3) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
W MSA on a Hardness Tester to satisfy a Customer who is requiring Hardness Cpk Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 17
R 6.2.2 - Any other ways to satisfy it if No Performance Evaluation carried out? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
I Confirmation of Computer Software to satisfy Intended Application Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
M 8.2.1.1 - Customer Satisfaction - How to satisfy the end requirement? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
R IEC 62133 to satisfy 60601-1 3rd edition - What happen to 60086-4 Other Medical Device Related Standards 18
M How to satisfy the Management Review requirement without a meeting? Management Review Meetings and related Processes 29
D SPC Software that will satisfy auto/furniture data submissions - Opinions wanted Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 5
J CMM MSA - Can you use 1 GRR to satisfy requirement for all Key Features? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 11
A Sample Documented Procedures that satisfy 4.4.6 Operational Control wanted ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
I Reply requirements to satisfy 21 CFR 820.198(e) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
N Customer Care - Building relationships to acquire, satisfy and retain customers Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
C Definition ATP Requirements (QAT, FAT, OSAT, FAI) - How to Satisfy FAT and OSAT? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 5
H How to Satisfy the Auditors with regards to these ISO Clauses? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Q Will the Certificate of Accuracy that comes with thread gages satisfy ISO9001? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 18
E What is Required of Me to Satisfy the NSF Auditor? TS16949 Internal Audits IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
ScottK Will this satisfy 8.2.1 Customer Satisfaction? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
C Minimum number of procedures to satisfy ISO9001 requirements Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 14
S How to confirm the ability of computer software to satisfy the intended application? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Marc Customer Satisfaction - Satisfy customers, make money Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 8
A Is ISO enough to satisfy these TQM approval questions? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
S 8.2.3.1 Reliability, Maintainability and Availability - How to satisfy requirement? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4
J How many procedures to satisfy TS 16949 and what are they? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Scott Catron Contract Manufacturing Pre-Qualification? How much 'due diligence' to satisfy the FDA ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
apestate How do I satisfy 4.1 - Identify and determine the sequence and interaction processes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
I Stating our goals to satisfy customers - What words can we use? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20
T Internet Report Card to Satisfy Customer Satisfaction - Delivery Performance, PPM IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 21
L Field Returns - 6.3.2 s - Contingency plans to satisfy customer requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
C ISO 13485 Clause 7.3.3 a) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S ISO 13485, Clause 4.1.2 b) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
B ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.1.3 - Decision Rule ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
T ISO/IEC17021-1 clause comparison Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
G ISO 9001-2015 How to co-relate Clause 4.2 & Clause 6.1 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 22
D AS9100 Rev D - Clause 8.7 Control of Non conforming outputs AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom