"Predictive Maintenance." IMO, another in a long line of boneheaded requirements in the QS9000.
In any event, one would need to compile historical data on equipment maintenance. Utilizing this data (and depending upon the nature of the failure) one MAY, and I emphasize MAY, be able to head off a breakdown before it happens. (e.g., a belt for the pulley in a blower motor seems to break every 6 months, so you replace it at 5.)
The best example I can give from personal experience is that we have what we feel is "predictive maintenance" on our tooling. We have an Excel spreadsheet with the tooling numbers all laid out by customer. We enter how many "hits" the tool has made and track the wear on the tool. In doing so, we can send the tool out for repair/retool/replacement before nonconforming product is ever produced.
If I may say so myself, it is one of our better acheivements in this area.
Keep in mind... the tooling area is a different animal and lends itself well to "predictable" wear and tear.
Predicting when, where, why and how a machine will break down is entirely different and, IMO, nearly impossible to do.
ALM