Randy said:
Here is the important stuff that these other weenies here like Claes might overlook....
Are you going to be compensated for the lost time and agravation of their not being ready when you were there on the 1st day?
You didn't agree to a 30-day net did you?
Did they spring for lunch?
The question above are the real important ones in this type of activity
BTW.....Good for ya mate!!
Paula, from what you write and my experience, you encountered a situation typical in many organizations:
"The folks know what to do to get product out the door, but they don't realize how much more effective and efficient they could be if they were a little better organized."
Somehow, I'm not quite clear on what the other consultant is doing. Is this kind of a "contest" between you to see who gets the job? In which case, Randy's comment is, IMHO, right on.
Speaking as a guy who has been on the hiring end of consultants for various aspects of our business other than quality management, I can tell you our hiring decision has usually had more to do with "personality fit" than with pure competence, since all our candidates were pre-screened for competence.
This could be your chance to shine as the "go to" guy for this company. Preface that report you make with lots of positive points of what they do now and elaborate on the business value of the improvement to be gained by filling in the gaps. Don't worry about the time table so much as on the understanding and willingness of the BCWIC ("big chief who's in charge") to get value from filling in the gaps. If you get over that hurdle, the rest will seem easy by comparison.
If you are making good progress by the original target date, most folks will continue to ride with you to the finish. You may even make the target date - it doesn't sound impossible. You sure demonstrate an ability to recognize the gaps. People skills will be critical in a situation like this.
I'm looking forward to "the rest of the story."