I LOVE YOU worm
Windows-Haters Crow Over Worm
by Leander Kahney
11:40 a.m. May. 9, 2000 PDT
While most of the world convalesces from the Love Bug worm, people running alternatives to Windows are smugly congratulating themselves for knowing better than to use Microsoft software.
The Love Bug and its variants over the last few days have melted down millions of computers worldwide and caused billions of dollars in damages. But clever users running Macs, the BeOS, and various flavors of Unix happily gloat that they were immune to the attacks.
Many of these users gleefully pointed out on message boards and mailing lists that the worm didn't do damage to all computer users; it only harmed Windows users who employ Microsoft's Outlook and Outlook Express email software.
"The point is that the root cause of these mass virus proliferations is a pathetically insecure email client foisted upon the public by a certain evil monopoly whose name I need not mention," wrote Seldolivaw Ssov in an email. "Hey, this *only* happens when you use Outlook and Outlook Express!"
"I think the reason it spread is because so many people use Outlook Express," said Jessie Liu, an analyst with market research firm Dataquest. "And the second reason is, people need to get more education about how to protect themselves from the network."
According to Dataquest, approximately 95 percent of the world's PCs are Intel-compatible, and the vast majority run Windows in one flavor or another.
As for Outlook and Outlook Express, Dataquest estimates 60 percent of business users are running those products, a number that is likely to increase as more and more IT managers dump Lotus Notes in favor of Microsoft products, Liu said.
But those users who are running alternatives were smug.
"I very much enjoyed computing all day yesterday, secure in the knowledge that the 'Love Bug' couldn't affect my machine," wrote Michael Dlugos, who uses a Mac, in a post to ZDNet's chat boards. "I got a ton of work done, and had many hearty chuckles at the poor sots who have to struggle along using Microsoft products. Get a Mac. It's the best kind of 'love' you can get from a computer."
Lynne Ragazzini, an engineer with Sun who runs Solaris, a variation of Unix, said she received the worm three times last week but it had no effect on her work machine or on her iMac at home.
Ragazzini said that instead of hunting down the author of the worm, law enforcement should be prosecuting "Microsloth" for configuring Outlook Express to run background scripts.
"It's a serious flaw that allows this kind of thing to happen again and again," she said. "The idea of allowing people to perform active processes using mail is a bad idea. You think they would have gotten it by now after Melissa. I avoid the whole Microsoft nightmare altogether."
John Poultney, former editor of MacHome, said the Love Bug and the Melissa virus vividly illustrate how easily homogenous computer networks can be bought to their knees.
"Information technology managers are willing to put up with virus attacks every three months, but refuse to support Macs on Windows networks," he said. "It doesn't make much sense to me. It's cheaper in the long run to have diversified networks."
Gene Steinberg, author of Upgrading & Troubleshooting Your Mac and the MacNightOwl site, pointed out that in an ironic twist, Macs were protected from the bug's bite because of a problem that has bedeviled them for years: slow and spotty software development for the platform.
Even though many Mac users run Microsoft software on their machines, Macs lack support for Visual Basic at the system level, a component that the Love Bug needs to do any damage, Steinberg said.
"This is the kind of neglect we want," he said.
Copyright © 2000 Wired Digital Inc., a Lycos Network site. All rights reserved.
Windows-Haters Crow Over Worm
by Leander Kahney
11:40 a.m. May. 9, 2000 PDT
While most of the world convalesces from the Love Bug worm, people running alternatives to Windows are smugly congratulating themselves for knowing better than to use Microsoft software.
The Love Bug and its variants over the last few days have melted down millions of computers worldwide and caused billions of dollars in damages. But clever users running Macs, the BeOS, and various flavors of Unix happily gloat that they were immune to the attacks.
Many of these users gleefully pointed out on message boards and mailing lists that the worm didn't do damage to all computer users; it only harmed Windows users who employ Microsoft's Outlook and Outlook Express email software.
"The point is that the root cause of these mass virus proliferations is a pathetically insecure email client foisted upon the public by a certain evil monopoly whose name I need not mention," wrote Seldolivaw Ssov in an email. "Hey, this *only* happens when you use Outlook and Outlook Express!"
"I think the reason it spread is because so many people use Outlook Express," said Jessie Liu, an analyst with market research firm Dataquest. "And the second reason is, people need to get more education about how to protect themselves from the network."
According to Dataquest, approximately 95 percent of the world's PCs are Intel-compatible, and the vast majority run Windows in one flavor or another.
As for Outlook and Outlook Express, Dataquest estimates 60 percent of business users are running those products, a number that is likely to increase as more and more IT managers dump Lotus Notes in favor of Microsoft products, Liu said.
But those users who are running alternatives were smug.
"I very much enjoyed computing all day yesterday, secure in the knowledge that the 'Love Bug' couldn't affect my machine," wrote Michael Dlugos, who uses a Mac, in a post to ZDNet's chat boards. "I got a ton of work done, and had many hearty chuckles at the poor sots who have to struggle along using Microsoft products. Get a Mac. It's the best kind of 'love' you can get from a computer."
Lynne Ragazzini, an engineer with Sun who runs Solaris, a variation of Unix, said she received the worm three times last week but it had no effect on her work machine or on her iMac at home.
Ragazzini said that instead of hunting down the author of the worm, law enforcement should be prosecuting "Microsloth" for configuring Outlook Express to run background scripts.
"It's a serious flaw that allows this kind of thing to happen again and again," she said. "The idea of allowing people to perform active processes using mail is a bad idea. You think they would have gotten it by now after Melissa. I avoid the whole Microsoft nightmare altogether."
John Poultney, former editor of MacHome, said the Love Bug and the Melissa virus vividly illustrate how easily homogenous computer networks can be bought to their knees.
"Information technology managers are willing to put up with virus attacks every three months, but refuse to support Macs on Windows networks," he said. "It doesn't make much sense to me. It's cheaper in the long run to have diversified networks."
Gene Steinberg, author of Upgrading & Troubleshooting Your Mac and the MacNightOwl site, pointed out that in an ironic twist, Macs were protected from the bug's bite because of a problem that has bedeviled them for years: slow and spotty software development for the platform.
Even though many Mac users run Microsoft software on their machines, Macs lack support for Visual Basic at the system level, a component that the Love Bug needs to do any damage, Steinberg said.
"This is the kind of neglect we want," he said.
Copyright © 2000 Wired Digital Inc., a Lycos Network site. All rights reserved.
