IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - Calibration of Nikon machine in factory

#1
Hi all,

Hopefully anyone can help me with this External Laboratory requirement.

We are using Nikon machine in factory and engage Nikon members to calibrate the machine all this while. During last year audit, auditor have highlight to us that Nikon is not certified with ISO 17025 and they explain the content of IATF standard clause 7.1.5.3.2
My understanding is we need to find external lab which certified with ISO 17025 OR get customer approval for next calibration. Easy way we find external lab to calibrate the machine rather than ask approval from customer.

The problem is now, external lab can perform the calibration but not able to do adjustment on the machine (data out calibration tolerance). So my queries now is:
1) Can we call Nikon to calibrate & service the machine and use their calibration cert instead? (note Nikon not certified with ISO 17025). And we attached external lab report as an evidence to show that we unable to find external lab to calibrate the mc and relate with below statement.
1550196247860.png


2) Or after Nikon calibrate & adjust machine, we call external lab to once again perform calibration (double pay for calibartion)

Please help me. Because now I'm in argument with my purchasing team due to this external lab requirement.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Sebastian

Trusted Information Resource
#2
Option 2 is partially "acceptable," as Nikon is not authorised to even verify or when needed adjust your equipment.
Auditor probably won't notice it, unless you tell him, but still it is not what is required by standard.
Option 1, there is another laboratory, but you are going to create document saying, there is no such laboratory.
I know people who are happy to have this kind of staff on board.
 
#3
Option 2 is partially "acceptable," as Nikon is not authorised to even verify or when needed adjust your equipment.
Auditor probably won't notice it, unless you tell him, but still it is not what is required by standard.
Option 1, there is another laboratory, but you are going to create document saying, there is no such laboratory.
I know people who are happy to have this kind of staff on board.
Option 1, actually external lab came over to calibrate but the report shows data out spec and they cant do adjustment. So think of using the report to show that external lab unable to do calibration.
 

Sebastian

Trusted Information Resource
#4
One comment - calibration is verification followed by adjustment/correction of errors observed during verification.
Nikon does both, even not authorised.
External lab does verification only.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#5
I would go with the approval from the customer option. No reason to have to providers for the one piece of equipment. Nikon built the darn thing, I am sure they can adjust and calibrate regardless of what IATF people say. Just tell the customer they will need to pay for the extra provider. :)
 
#6
One comment - calibration is verification followed by adjustment/correction of errors observed during verification.
Nikon does both, even not authorised.
External lab does verification only.
Thanks for the comment. That is why we call Nikon for calibartion & adjustment. Now I stand with my opinion for option 1 but not sure whether it is acceptable or not =)
 
#7
I would go with the approval from the customer option. No reason to have to providers for the one piece of equipment. Nikon built the darn thing, I am sure they can adjust and calibrate regardless of what IATF people say. Just tell the customer they will need to pay for the extra provider. :)
You just dont now how complicated it will be if I go with cust approval (especially they have to pay for extra provider =)). by the way thanks for the comment.
 
#8
I am a little surprised the auditor picked you up on that. My experience, particularly with complex measurement systems (CMMs, roundtesters, etc), is that the manufacturer has generally been accepted even without ISO17025. As Sebastian says above, calibration is more than just checking that the measurement is correct. It also includes adjustment where necessary. Generally, commercial calibration houses would not have the knowledge/training to make the adjustments, even if they are ISO 17025 accredited. In that case it is normally the manufacturers engineers or even their agents that would do the work.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#9
I am a little surprised the auditor picked you up on that. My experience, particularly with complex measurement systems (CMMs, roundtesters, etc), is that the manufacturer has generally been accepted even without ISO17025. As Sebastian says above, calibration is more than just checking that the measurement is correct. It also includes adjustment where necessary. Generally, commercial calibration houses would not have the knowledge/training to make the adjustments, even if they are ISO 17025 accredited. In that case it is normally the manufacturers engineers or even their agents that would do the work.
The problem is the standard. It's pretty specific and an auditor just can't ignore it if he finds it. We used to have all kinds of this "trouble" with our weight scales. We would have the scale people in to calibrate and verify in accordance with state rules. Auditors always questioned it. It was a real PIA.
 
#10
I am a little surprised the auditor picked you up on that. My experience, particularly with complex measurement systems (CMMs, roundtesters, etc), is that the manufacturer has generally been accepted even without ISO17025. As Sebastian says above, calibration is more than just checking that the measurement is correct. It also includes adjustment where necessary. Generally, commercial calibration houses would not have the knowledge/training to make the adjustments, even if they are ISO 17025 accredited. In that case it is normally the manufacturers engineers or even their agents that would do the work.
previously no issue with this. in 2018 we have customer audit and IATF audit, auditor have highlight this issue. It already stated in standard and we have to comply to it. luckily we do not get NC. Thats y we find external lab to perform calibration. but the issue is they cannot do adjustment. now our purchasing call Nikon to do calibration and adjustment and call external lab to do 2nd time calibration to get cert with iso17025.
my dept need to bare cost for 2 times calibration.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N IATF 16949:2016 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - How to approve the Testing Laboratory without accreditation scope IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Casana IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - On Site Calibration IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
B IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.2 FAQ #7 Audit Finding - External Calibration Laboratory IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
sswaim IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.2 External Calibration Laboratory Requirelents IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
B IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.3.2 - External Laboratory Sub-Supplier Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M Tips on preparing for IATF 16949 Internal Lead Auditor exam Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
A IATF 16949 4.3.1 - Determining the scope of the quality management system - supplemental IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
S Definition of "worldwide" in view of IATF 16949 and Product conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
R Where does IATF 16949 address Process mapping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A Document "Correspondence IATF 16949 vs ISO13485" available? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
H Remote product audits in Coivd-19 - IATF 16949 9.2.2.4 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
S IATF 16949 - Partial traceability of Aftermarket products IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M IATF 16949 8.5.1.3 Verification of job set-ups - Do we need secondary check? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
C Industrial scales and MSA (IATF 16949 requirement 7.1.5.1.1) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 30
V Generic IATF 16949 Audit Checklist wanted IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
M Scope of Combined ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 QMS - Non-automotive customers ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
D Postpone IATF 16949 audit due to COVID-19 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 34
J Does anyone have an excel IATF 16949 Internal Audit checklist I could use? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
T Reaction Plan To Drive suppliers to IATF 16949 registration IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
B IATF 16949 - Is a Deviation required for sample components in a prototype build? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
C IATF 16949 - Scope or not? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
L "IATF-Compliant" IATF 16949:2016 certification? What does this mean? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
B Go Beyond ISO 9001 WITH IATF 16949 (January 28) [Paid] Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
S Can we provide training plan as corrective action for IATF 16949 Non conformity? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
C Design and implementation of process audits as defined within IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Q VDA 6.3 questions vs IATF 16949 clauses VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 0
M IATF 16949 (6.1.1 - Planning and Risk Analysis for a remote site) Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
D IATF 16949 FAQ 24 (8.4.2.2 Countries of Destination) - How is this actually being interpreted? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Jimmy123 What is the difference between Error Proofing and Controls? ISO/IATF 16949 - Control Plans FMEA and Control Plans 16
P IATF 16949 8.4.2.4 Supplier Monitoring IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
V IATF 16949 9.2.2.1 Internal Audit Program - "Process Changes" IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
C IATF 16949 8.3 Exclusion - Manufacturing process design and development IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
J IATF 16949 8.4.1.2 Supplier selection process IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
M IATF 16949 CAPITULO 7.3.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
M IATF 16949 7.2.3 Internal Auditor Competency - Trainer's competency Internal Auditing 7
P IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.2.3 - Justification for non-certified suppliers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
M IATF 16949:2016 clause 8.4.2.3 - We don't have ISO 9001:2015 certificate IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 26
T New role Quality Manager IATF 16949, new company, advise how to get started IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
R Material safety data sheet (MSDS) related clause in IATF 16949 manual IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
R IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.6 a) maintenance and repair facilities - Production tooling management and personnel IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
C IATF 16949:2016 Section 8.5.1.2 item d) accessible for use at the designated work area(s) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
QChas IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.2 - C -Standardized Work IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
J Manufacturing Process Auditor Requirements - IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
QMMike IATF 16949 Audit Day Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Crimpshrine13 IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 Remote Support - Pass Through Inventory IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 20
B IATF 16949 Cl. 4.3.2 - CSR vs Commercial Agreements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
P IATF 16949 - Monitoring Suppliers for Premium Freight IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
L IATF 16949 8.3.3.2 FCA (Fiat Chrysler) Specific Requirements - Examples of AQR and MPFMEA Service Industry Specific Topics 1
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom