IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - Calibration of Nikon machine in factory

N

Nurul

#1
Hi all,

Hopefully anyone can help me with this External Laboratory requirement.

We are using Nikon machine in factory and engage Nikon members to calibrate the machine all this while. During last year audit, auditor have highlight to us that Nikon is not certified with ISO 17025 and they explain the content of IATF standard clause 7.1.5.3.2
My understanding is we need to find external lab which certified with ISO 17025 OR get customer approval for next calibration. Easy way we find external lab to calibrate the machine rather than ask approval from customer.

The problem is now, external lab can perform the calibration but not able to do adjustment on the machine (data out calibration tolerance). So my queries now is:
1) Can we call Nikon to calibrate & service the machine and use their calibration cert instead? (note Nikon not certified with ISO 17025). And we attached external lab report as an evidence to show that we unable to find external lab to calibrate the mc and relate with below statement.
1550196247860.png

2) Or after Nikon calibrate & adjust machine, we call external lab to once again perform calibration (double pay for calibartion)

Please help me. Because now I'm in argument with my purchasing team due to this external lab requirement.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Sebastian

Trusted Information Resource
#2
Option 2 is partially "acceptable," as Nikon is not authorised to even verify or when needed adjust your equipment.
Auditor probably won't notice it, unless you tell him, but still it is not what is required by standard.
Option 1, there is another laboratory, but you are going to create document saying, there is no such laboratory.
I know people who are happy to have this kind of staff on board.
 
N

Nurul

#3
Option 2 is partially "acceptable," as Nikon is not authorised to even verify or when needed adjust your equipment.
Auditor probably won't notice it, unless you tell him, but still it is not what is required by standard.
Option 1, there is another laboratory, but you are going to create document saying, there is no such laboratory.
I know people who are happy to have this kind of staff on board.
Option 1, actually external lab came over to calibrate but the report shows data out spec and they cant do adjustment. So think of using the report to show that external lab unable to do calibration.
 

Sebastian

Trusted Information Resource
#4
One comment - calibration is verification followed by adjustment/correction of errors observed during verification.
Nikon does both, even not authorised.
External lab does verification only.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#5
I would go with the approval from the customer option. No reason to have to providers for the one piece of equipment. Nikon built the darn thing, I am sure they can adjust and calibrate regardless of what IATF people say. Just tell the customer they will need to pay for the extra provider. :)
 
N

Nurul

#6
One comment - calibration is verification followed by adjustment/correction of errors observed during verification.
Nikon does both, even not authorised.
External lab does verification only.
Thanks for the comment. That is why we call Nikon for calibartion & adjustment. Now I stand with my opinion for option 1 but not sure whether it is acceptable or not =)
 
N

Nurul

#7
I would go with the approval from the customer option. No reason to have to providers for the one piece of equipment. Nikon built the darn thing, I am sure they can adjust and calibrate regardless of what IATF people say. Just tell the customer they will need to pay for the extra provider. :)
You just dont now how complicated it will be if I go with cust approval (especially they have to pay for extra provider =)). by the way thanks for the comment.
 
K

Kickatgoal

#8
I am a little surprised the auditor picked you up on that. My experience, particularly with complex measurement systems (CMMs, roundtesters, etc), is that the manufacturer has generally been accepted even without ISO17025. As Sebastian says above, calibration is more than just checking that the measurement is correct. It also includes adjustment where necessary. Generally, commercial calibration houses would not have the knowledge/training to make the adjustments, even if they are ISO 17025 accredited. In that case it is normally the manufacturers engineers or even their agents that would do the work.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#9
I am a little surprised the auditor picked you up on that. My experience, particularly with complex measurement systems (CMMs, roundtesters, etc), is that the manufacturer has generally been accepted even without ISO17025. As Sebastian says above, calibration is more than just checking that the measurement is correct. It also includes adjustment where necessary. Generally, commercial calibration houses would not have the knowledge/training to make the adjustments, even if they are ISO 17025 accredited. In that case it is normally the manufacturers engineers or even their agents that would do the work.
The problem is the standard. It's pretty specific and an auditor just can't ignore it if he finds it. We used to have all kinds of this "trouble" with our weight scales. We would have the scale people in to calibrate and verify in accordance with state rules. Auditors always questioned it. It was a real PIA.
 
N

Nurul

#10
I am a little surprised the auditor picked you up on that. My experience, particularly with complex measurement systems (CMMs, roundtesters, etc), is that the manufacturer has generally been accepted even without ISO17025. As Sebastian says above, calibration is more than just checking that the measurement is correct. It also includes adjustment where necessary. Generally, commercial calibration houses would not have the knowledge/training to make the adjustments, even if they are ISO 17025 accredited. In that case it is normally the manufacturers engineers or even their agents that would do the work.
previously no issue with this. in 2018 we have customer audit and IATF audit, auditor have highlight this issue. It already stated in standard and we have to comply to it. luckily we do not get NC. Thats y we find external lab to perform calibration. but the issue is they cannot do adjustment. now our purchasing call Nikon to do calibration and adjustment and call external lab to do 2nd time calibration to get cert with iso17025.
my dept need to bare cost for 2 times calibration.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D IATF 16949 SI 10, External non-accredited lab IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
N IATF 16949:2016 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - How to approve the Testing Laboratory without accreditation scope IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Casana IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - On Site Calibration IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
B IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.2 FAQ #7 Audit Finding - External Calibration Laboratory IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
sswaim IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.2 External Calibration Laboratory Requirelents IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
B IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.3.2 - External Laboratory Sub-Supplier Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Ashland78 Need IATF 16949 ISO Gap Analysis Excel File Internal Auditing 3
T Justification of "Design Excluded" in IATF 16949 Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
Sidney Vianna Job Opening in the USA - IATF 16949 Lead Auditor Position Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
Ron Rompen IATF 16949 8.5.1.4 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
P IATF 16949:2016 Letter of conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
S IATF 16949 - Summary at a glance Clause wise - changes from ISO TS IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
T IATF 16949 Recording inspection results IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S IATF 16949 Supplier selection criteria 8.4.1.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D IATF 16949 M&TE Laboratory scope IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
M IATF 16949 SI # 10: Integrated self-calibration of measurement equipment- Needs for explanation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J IATF 16949 Calibration/Verification records question ISO 26262 - Road vehicles – Functional safety 6
D Bulk Materials (Greases) and IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J IATF 16949 Internal Audit question - Auditor's responsibility Internal Auditing 6
S IATF 16949 Internal Audit Example IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
B Remote IATF 16949 audit preparation General Auditing Discussions 10
R IATF 16949 Certification for new site with transferred product--what is the impact with CSR and scorecards? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
B IATF 16949 Cert Expire- New certification body IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M IATF 16949 - Audit of Remote Location/Support Site and IT IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
O Informational Ford Motor Company Customer Specific Requirements for IATF 16949:2016 - 08 Jan 2021 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
B Updated IATF 16949 - Will IATF 16949 get revised when ISO 9001:202X is released? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
O Release of Sanctioned Interpretations (SIs) related to Rules 5th Edition and Sanctioned Interpretations related to IATF 16949:2016 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
S Thoughts on managing ISO 9001, 13485, IATF 16949 and 17025 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
P IATF 16949 requirement - error-proofing in control plan IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
R IATF 16949 - Outsourcing of internal audits Internal Auditing 11
eule del ayre Documented Information - Periodic Review of Documents? IATF 16949:2016 / ISO 9001:2015 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 34
Crimpshrine13 Laboratory Scope - Calibration vs. Test Methods - IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
earl62 What is the best way to control special characteristics in Control plan? Is it Mandatory to have SPC for IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
L IATF 16949 certification costs IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
B FCA US Customer Specific IATF 16949- Critical Characteristics 8.6.2 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
B IATF 16949 News Six month extension on all valid IATF 16949 certs IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
earl62 IATF 16949 Clause 9.1.1.1 - What is the batch conformance to specification method? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
B FCA US IATF 16949 Customer Requirements updates Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
S Can assembly manufacturing sub-supplier be certified IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
D IATF 16949 Requirement for CMMI in a Global Company Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 0
M Tips on preparing for IATF 16949 Internal Lead Auditor exam Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
A IATF 16949 4.3.1 - Determining the scope of the quality management system - supplemental IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
S Definition of "worldwide" in view of IATF 16949 and Product conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
R Where does IATF 16949 address Process mapping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A Document "Correspondence IATF 16949 vs ISO13485" available? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
H Remote product audits in Coivd-19 - IATF 16949 9.2.2.4 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
S IATF 16949 - Partial traceability of Aftermarket products IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M IATF 16949 8.5.1.3 Verification of job set-ups - Do we need secondary check? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
C Industrial scales and MSA (IATF 16949 requirement 7.1.5.1.1) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 30

Similar threads

Top Bottom