IATF 16949 Cl. 8.4.2.3 - Supplier Quality Management System Development

AMIT BALLAL

Trusted Information Resource
#51
Ok. In your opinion, if an organization does not buy any materials/components to produce their own products but they have assembly lines/heat treatment lines and workers and their business is to process components/materials supplied from their customers and deliver assembled/heat treated automotive products to the customers.

1) Are they eligible for IATF16949 certification?
2) If they are eligible what would the CB write as the scope of certification in their IATF16949 certificate?
Please don't take my comments on you. Only thing we are discussing is on standards, rules and its implementation.

If this organization is automotive, then eligible for certification.
Scope can be "Assembly and heat treatment of products such as XXXX".
 
Last edited:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Sebastian

Trusted Information Resource
#52
Example of heat treatment certificate
https://hauckht.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/0020855-001-16949-ENGUS-IATF-2.pdf

SI#8 add word "eligible" because of "target QMS level" in clause 8.4.2.3. For some suppliers target QMS level would be d), for others c). Why not b) or even a)? Good question.

Purchased good can be automotive or non-automotive. Everything depends how do we use it. When used in product/manufacturing of product intended for automotive customer, it becomes automotive.

Several years ago during approval process our product was rejected. Reason was very serious - use of hexavalent Chromium. We were shocked as we were sure, that nor component nor process included this element. Further investigation revealed that problem source was pen we used for numbering part stickers corresponding to inspection results presented in report.

QualitySpirit interpretation of pens and ISO 9001 certification is absolutely right. Everything depends on risk-based model and pen application. I am aware that most or even all suppliers using pens in their mass production manufacturing process do not care whether they get them from certified or not certified supplier, but requirement is requirement and I understand and support its intention.
 

AMIT BALLAL

Trusted Information Resource
#53
Example of heat treatment certificate
https://hauckht.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/0020855-001-16949-ENGUS-IATF-2.pdf

SI#8 add word "eligible" because of "target QMS level" in clause 8.4.2.3. For some suppliers target QMS level would be d), for others c). Why not b) or even a)? Good question.

Purchased good can be automotive or non-automotive. Everything depends how do we use it. When used in product/manufacturing of product intended for automotive customer, it becomes automotive.

Several years ago during approval process our product was rejected. Reason was very serious - use of hexavalent Chromium. We were shocked as we were sure, that nor component nor process included this element. Further investigation revealed that problem source was pen we used for numbering part stickers corresponding to inspection results presented in report.

QualitySpirit interpretation of pens and ISO 9001 certification is absolutely right. Everything depends on risk-based model and pen application. I am aware that most or even all suppliers using pens in their mass production manufacturing process do not care whether they get them from certified or not certified supplier, but requirement is requirement and I understand and support its intention.
Right. It depends on its use and risk. My reply was based on the examples of pens and toilet papers given by him.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#54
Guys the key word is "automotive."

As far as the IATF is concerned they could over complicate a one car parade. "Eligible organizations" in their re-write is redundant.

Hexavalent chromium prohibition and ISO /IATF certification are two completely different requirements. One does not relate to the other.
 
#55
Hi Guys,

Coming back to this topic. My company have just received a NC during the IATF, as we were not using a risk-based model to define a minimum acceptable level of QMS development and a target QMS development level for our suppliers.
What we had defined is minimum ISO 9001 with the development towards IATF, plus we started with the MAQMSR requirement for the suppliers which do not have IATF.

But, the auditor insisted that the acceptable levels should be an outcome of a risk analysis and we should define from which supplier we require which certification (9001, 9001+MAQMSR or IATF) out of this risk analysis.

Does any of you has such a risk analysis model or maybe some hints on how should be this implemented?

Your feedback is highly apreciated.

Best regards,
Istvan K.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#56
Hi Guys,

Coming back to this topic. My company have just received a NC during the IATF, as we were not using a risk-based model to define a minimum acceptable level of QMS development and a target QMS development level for our suppliers.
What we had defined is minimum ISO 9001 with the development towards IATF, plus we started with the MAQMSR requirement for the suppliers which do not have IATF.

But, the auditor insisted that the acceptable levels should be an outcome of a risk analysis and we should define from which supplier we require which certification (9001, 9001+MAQMSR or IATF) out of this risk analysis.

Does any of you has such a risk analysis model or maybe some hints on how should be this implemented?

Your feedback is highly apreciated.

Best regards,
Istvan K.
Take a look at your suppliers. Who is high risk, who is medium risk, who is low risk? First pass, I wouldn't over complicate it. The higher the risk, the further and quicker you want them up to the IATF standard. Low risk suppliers, may not even need ISO. Good luck.
 

Mikey324

Quite Involved in Discussions
#57
We thought of it like this:

What is the absolute minimum QMS level we want to accept = ISO 9001
What is the supplies quality performance rating?
What is the supplier delivery performance rating?

So supplier A is IATF 16949 certified. Their quality rating is 75%. Their delivery rating is 80%
Suppler B is ISO 9001 certified. Their quality rating is 99.8%, delivery is 100%

With that mentioned above, which supplier actually needs QMS development? By doing this, you are already analyzing risk using quality, delivery, and anything else of value to your organization as determining factors. We wanted to use a method that kept us compliant, but had actual value to our organization.
 

vincee

Involved In Discussions
#58
Hi Guys,

Coming back to this topic. My company have just received a NC during the IATF, as we were not using a risk-based model to define a minimum acceptable level of QMS development and a target QMS development level for our suppliers.
What we had defined is minimum ISO 9001 with the development towards IATF, plus we started with the MAQMSR requirement for the suppliers which do not have IATF.

But, the auditor insisted that the acceptable levels should be an outcome of a risk analysis and we should define from which supplier we require which certification (9001, 9001+MAQMSR or IATF) out of this risk analysis.

Does any of you has such a risk analysis model or maybe some hints on how should be this implemented?

Your feedback is highly apreciated.

Best regards,
Istvan K.
 

vincee

Involved In Discussions
#59
Hi Istvan I recommend creating some sort of matrix or heat map to track your suppliers targets based on a risk model. This will show the suppliers current status, the min. requirement, their target based on a risk model, for example SOR similar as a PFMEA. Where you first start off with a Supplier Assessment, then have the product of, Severity(S) based on the product criticality, Occurrence(O) based on the suppliers percentage of volume that is Automotive Product and Risk (R) based on the total volumes produced by your suppliers over last year...Simple Example below...Hope this helps...Good Luck!

1559133210752.png
 
#60
Hi Vince, many thanks for your feedback. I think about a rating from 1 to 5, for S, O and R. so it would fit to the "RPN" criterias (>18, >12, >9)
I would replace the O (Occurrence ) assessment to something related to the failures (incidents) or generally to the quality performance of the supplier, instead of the automotive share of the supplier. What do you think?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
P IATF 16949 8.4.2.4 Supplier Monitoring IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
J IATF 16949 8.4.1.2 Supplier selection process IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
noratkhen Eligibility to get a IATF 16949 certificate for a Tier N>3 supplier? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 25
B IATF 16949 Supplier QMS Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A IATF 16949 Cl. 8.4.1.2 Supplier Selection Process - assessment example IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
P Supplier (Vendor) Evaluation Criteria - IATF 16949 Cl. 8.4.1.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
H Sorting Supplier Requirements - IATF 16949 Cl. 8.4.2.3 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
E IATF 16949 Cl. 8.4.2.5 - Supplier Development Type and Extent IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M IATF 16949 Cl. 8.4.2.2 - Country of Receipt - The provider's or supplier's country? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
S IATF 16949 Supplier Management - Supplier Tooling Requirements Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
B IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.3.2 - External Laboratory Sub-Supplier Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
W IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.2.4.1 Second Party Audits (Supplier Management) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 40
B IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.1.2 - Supplier Selection Process - Service Providers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
R Where does IATF 16949 address Process mapping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A Document "Correspondence IATF 16949 vs ISO13485" available? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
H Remote product audits in Coivd-19 - IATF 16949 9.2.2.4 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
S IATF 16949 - Partial traceability of Aftermarket products IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M IATF 16949 8.5.1.3 Verification of job set-ups - Do we need secondary check? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
C Industrial scales and MSA (IATF 16949 requirement 7.1.5.1.1) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 30
V Generic IATF 16949 Audit Checklist wanted IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
M Scope of Combined ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 QMS - Non-automotive customers ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
D Postpone IATF 16949 audit due to COVID-19 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 33
J Does anyone have an excel IATF 16949 Internal Audit checklist I could use? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
T Reaction Plan To Drive suppliers to IATF 16949 registration IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
B IATF 16949 - Is a Deviation required for sample components in a prototype build? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
C IATF 16949 - Scope or not? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
L "IATF-Compliant" IATF 16949:2016 certification? What does this mean? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
B Go Beyond ISO 9001 WITH IATF 16949 (January 28) [Paid] Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
S Can we provide training plan as corrective action for IATF 16949 Non conformity? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
C Design and implementation of process audits as defined within IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Q VDA 6.3 questions vs IATF 16949 clauses VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 0
N IATF 16949:2016 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - How to approve the Testing Laboratory without accreditation scope IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
M IATF 16949 (6.1.1 - Planning and Risk Analysis for a remote site) Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
D IATF 16949 FAQ 24 (8.4.2.2 Countries of Destination) - How is this actually being interpreted? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Jimmy123 What is the difference between Error Proofing and Controls? ISO/IATF 16949 - Control Plans FMEA and Control Plans 16
V IATF 16949 9.2.2.1 Internal Audit Program - "Process Changes" IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
C IATF 16949 8.3 Exclusion - Manufacturing process design and development IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M IATF 16949 CAPITULO 7.3.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Casana IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - On Site Calibration IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
M IATF 16949 7.2.3 Internal Auditor Competency - Trainer's competency Internal Auditing 7
P IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.2.3 - Justification for non-certified suppliers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
M IATF 16949:2016 clause 8.4.2.3 - We don't have ISO 9001:2015 certificate IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 26
T New role Quality Manager IATF 16949, new company, advise how to get started IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
R Material safety data sheet (MSDS) related clause in IATF 16949 manual IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
R IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.6 a) maintenance and repair facilities - Production tooling management and personnel IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
C IATF 16949:2016 Section 8.5.1.2 item d) accessible for use at the designated work area(s) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
QChas IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.2 - C -Standardized Work IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
J Manufacturing Process Auditor Requirements - IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom