IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.2.3 - Justification for non-certified suppliers

#1
How would you justify to an auditor using a supplier who is not ISO 9001 nor IATF 16949 certified? In what scenarios would this be allowed (other than the directly mentioned ones you have customer approval to use)?

TYIA!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Johnnymo62

Haste Makes Waste
#3
I think a robust receiving inspection of that suppliers parts can be helpful.
Your company auditing theirs on a regular basis.
Good corrective actions from them for any parts, OTD or other issues caused by your supplier.
If they are the only supplier that makes the parts you get from them will help.

Good Luck.
 

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#4
Certain customers allow you to have non ISO 9001 certified suppliers
Check your customer CSRs-- these do not have to be individually approved suppliers:

Ford:
Sub-tier supplier quality management system requirements
• Where a sub-tier supplier is not third party certified to ISO/TS 16949, Ford reserves the right to require the organization to ensure sub-tier supplier
compliance with the “Minimum Automotive Quality Management System Requirements for Sub-tier Suppliers” available through
International Automotive Task Force – The IATF is an "ad hoc" group of automotive manufacturers and their respective trade associations, formed to provide improved quality products to automotive customers worldwide.. Evidence of effectiveness shall be based on having a defined process and implementation of the process including measurement and monitoring.
• Where any organization has sub-tier suppliers not third party certified to ISO/TS 16949, the organization is encouraged to require sub-tier supplier
compliance with the “Minimum Automotive Quality Management System Requirements for Sub-tier Suppliers”.
GM
When a supplier to an organization is so small as to not have adequate resources to develop a system according to IATF 16949:2016 or ISO 9001:2015, certain specified elements may be waived by the organization. The organization shall have decision criteria for determining “specially designated small suppliers”. Such decision criteria shall be in writing and applied consistently in the application of this provision. The existence and use of such decision criteria shall be verified by 3rd party auditors.
NOTE 1: ISO 9001:2015 and IATF 16949:2016 Minimum Automotive Quality Management System Requirements for Sub-Tier Suppliers contain fundamental quality management system requirements of value to any size of provider of production materials, production, service, and accessory parts, or heat treating, plating, painting or other finishing services. There are a number of methods to implement a compliant system, so it is recognized that a simpler Quality Management System approach could be used for the smaller suppliers of organizations to which IATF 16949:2016 clause 8.4.2.3 applies.
NOTE 2: “Small” may also refer to volume supplied to automotive.
All the reasons that others have given are excuses and could be used to mitigate from a major to a minor but none would be acceptable as per the standards as this says shall

Using a risk-based model, the organization shall define a minimum acceptable level of QMS development and a target QMS development level for each supplier.​
Unless otherwise authorized by the customer a QMS certified to ISO 9001 is the initial minimum acceptable level of development. Based on current performance and the potential risk to the customer, the objective is to move suppliers through the following QMS development​
progression:​
 

Ron Rompen

Trusted Information Resource
#5
The last part of Howards post is the most important one. What you do to protect your customer from potential nonconformances from this supplier will be the critical factor.

An option which nobody else has suggested yet is (if it's feasible, and if you want to pursue it) to seek approval from your customer to use this supplier 'as-is'.
 

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#6
FWIW...it is a common thing. Not the majority I think, but common all the same.

My company has no formally documented QMS, and no formally documented processes...I'm just too small to justify doing it.
All the same, I sell to quite a few Automotive, aerospace, medical and governmental agencies on a weekly if not daily basis.
They all have to answer that same question to their auditors...and about once a year I get a questionnaire from someone looking for answers to feed an auditor.

My advice for any question from an auditor...just tell the truth, plain and simple.
You have a reason for buying from a non-ISO house...a reason you are comfortable with, else you would change suppliers.
It is YOUR reasoning (risk/reward/responsibility) that makes you OK with continuing...share that...don't try to invent some other reason. K.I.S.S.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#7
If you are being audited, you need to have approval from your customers to use non-iso certified suppliers. That much is clear. That approval can come from customer specific requirements (such as GM above) or a direct "sure go ahead an use them" letter from the customer. Some auditors are better than others -- we have had some accept an old email regarding a small legacy supplier, and others push back on it as not being "official." The justification really needs to be given to your customer so they will approve their use. Good luck.
 

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#8
If you are being audited, you need to have approval from your customers to use non-iso certified suppliers. That much is clear.
That is not my experience, having supplied 4 Tier I & Tier II automakers...not a lot, but more than one...

With a customer auditor? Sure, you need customer signoff, we got ours from the auditor himself.
With a contract internal auditor...it took a lot of discussion, but it passed.
With a CB auditor for surveillance audits? We had incoming validation of parts purchased, from a non-cert company with no issues from the auditor.

Curiosity...can you reference the "shall" that makes it "clear" to you?
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#9
That is not my experience, having supplied 4 Tier I & Tier II automakers...not a lot, but more than one...

With a customer auditor? Sure, you need customer signoff, we got ours from the auditor himself.
With a contract internal auditor...it took a lot of discussion, but it passed.
With a CB auditor for surveillance audits? We had incoming validation of parts purchased, from a non-cert company with no issues from the auditor.

Curiosity...can you reference the "shall" that makes it "clear" to you?
Sanctioned interpretation no. 8 with regard to 8.4.2.3: "Unless otherwise authorized by the customer, a QMS certified to ISO 9001 is the initial minimal acceptable level of development." The note further clarifies -- ISO compliance with second party audits, if authorized by the customer.

IATF 16949:2016 Sanctioned Interpretations (SIs) – International Automotive Task Force
 

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#10
a QMS certified to ISO 9001 is the initial minimal acceptable level of development
Thanks...appreciated. I learned something.

Curiosity remains, however, as to why they would use the term "initial minimal acceptable level"...does that mean that "we asked them to be, they said no, so it isn't initial anymore and OK that they aren't" ? Probably not...just thinking out loud...
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
earl62 IATF 16949 Clause 9.1.1.1 - What is the batch conformance to specification method? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
M IATF 16949:2016 clause 8.4.2.3 - We don't have ISO 9001:2015 certificate IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 26
R Material safety data sheet (MSDS) related clause in IATF 16949 manual IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
R IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.6 a) maintenance and repair facilities - Production tooling management and personnel IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
QChas IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.2 - C -Standardized Work IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
N Looking for input on the attached Process / IATF 16949 Clause Matrix IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
R IATF 16949 Clause 6.1.2.1 - Lessons Learned and Risk Analysis IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
L IATF 16949 Clause 9.2.2.2 Quality Management System Audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
H IATF 16949 Clause 9.2.2.2 Audit System / CSR IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
B IATF 16949 clause 7.1.5.1.1 - Statistical studies shall be conducted IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
P Interesting Discussion IATF 16949:2016 Clause 9.2.2.3 and Layered Process Audits IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
M Reference to IATF 16949 clause 8.4.3 in clause 8.3.4.4, Is it right? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
M IATF 16949 Clause 8.3.5.2 sub-clause (l) - Process maintainability requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
J IATF 16949 Clause 9.3.2.1 - How to understand "measures" IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
J How to address IATF 16949 clause 5.1.1.1 in my Quality Manual IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
B IATF 16949 clause 8.3.4.3 Prototype programme IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
DeeDeeM IATF 16949 - Clause 8.5.2 Identification and Traceability IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
W IATF 16949 Clause 6.1.1 - My first Major NCR (Management Review) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 57
A Escalation Process - IATF 16949 Clause 4.4.1.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
E IATF 16949 Clause of 8.4.3 - Approvals - Can you explain to me IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
B IATF 16949 Clause 9.2.2.2 - Which QMS Processes are Included IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
J What are sample documents of IATF 16949 Clause 8.6.4 a? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S IATF 16949 Clause 8.3.3.3 - Documentation of all Special Characteristics in Drawings IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
B IATF 16949 Section Clause 8.3.4.1 - Monitoring - Design and Development Input(s) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
B IATF 16949 Clause 8.6.2 - Layout Inspection and Functional Testing IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
B IATF 16949 Clause 9.3.2.1 - Management Review Inputs IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
T Customer Authorization for Concession - IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.1 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
W IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.2.4.1 Second Party Audits (Supplier Management) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 45
T Record Retention Requirements - IATF 16949 Clause 7.5.3.2.1 Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 15
B IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.6.1.1 (Temporary Process Control Change) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 24
T Temporary Change of Process Controls - IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.5.1.1 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 16
B IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.1.2 - Supplier Selection Process - Service Providers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J IATF 16949 Clause 8.7.1.7 Nonconforming Product Disposition - Scrap Rendered Unusable IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 64
M IATF 16949 Clause 4.4.1.2 - Product Safety - Concept of the Title IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
M IATF 16949 Clause 7.1.5.1.1 - What are "inspection equipment systems"? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
P Setup Verification in IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.3 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
D Does IATF 16949:2016 Clause 7.3 (now 8.3) Apply to "Grandfathered" Products IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
J IATF 16949 Clause 8.7.1.7 Nonconforming Product Disposition Compliance IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 38
M Exclusion of IATF 16949 Clause 4.4.1.2 - Product Safety IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
P Problem with IATF 16949 Clause 7.2.3 Requirements (Internal Auditor Competency) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
M IATF 16949 Clause 4.4.1.2 - Product Safety IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
M Compliance with IATF 16949 Clause 8.3.4.4 Product Approval Process IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
dubrizo IATF 16949 Clause 8.7.1.6 - Customer Notification - Your Inputs Requested IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
P IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.6.1.1 - Temporary Change of Process Controls IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 21
M IATF 16949 Clause 8.3 - Rework Records Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
J What results need to be defined in IATF 16949 Clause 8.3.4 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
P IATF 16949 Clause 10.2.4 - Error Proofing IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 25
P IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.4 - Verification after Shutdown IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
J How to understand IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.6.1.1 - Process Controls IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
J How to understand IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.2.1 - Traceability IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom