IATF 16949 - Non-conformity on 5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness and efficiency

Andrei77

Starting to get Involved
#1
Hello everyone,

We have recently passed an IATF transition audit with a lot of minor NC and a few major NC as well.
One of the minors strikes me a bit awkward as I believe it is at the discretion of our management and leadership to chose what to measure and what not.
Of course, there`s a belief (true, in my mind) that what gets measured gets done, but why would an auditor single out some processes (engineering, design, calibration) for not having been measured with KPI`s?

Right now I am supposed to analyze all these non-conformities and their root cause/s and I am really struggling on answering Y`s on this one.

The NC is worded like this: "During the audit, it was found that the processes of engineering, calibration and design did not have any targeted KPI's assigned to them."

Any thoughts?

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#2
It's been a long standing requirement in auto that all process have a kpi. It's kind of dumb because you can have a process you use infrequently that doesn't lend itself to kpi measurement. And as you say, it should be mgmt discretion. As for root cause there isn't one other than misunderstanding of the requirements. Good luck.
 
R

Rainha

#3
I am having a similar issue with this clause and working to update our scoreboards before our recertification audit.

Our Internal Auditor wrote us a nonconformity for lacking both an effectiveness and an efficiency metric for each process. We already have metrics defined for each process (some with multiple metrics), but according to him they represent one or the other and there should be both.

In my opinion, if we are tracking metrics that make sense for each process that should be enough to conform? If a metric is not meeting target it is going to be a red flag to investigate.
 

Andrei77

Starting to get Involved
#4
Thank you very much everyone,

I really appreciate all your thoughts.
I did some research and I`ve found something which it might be interesting.
• The rate of New Product Introduction – Indicates how rapidly new products can be introduced to the marketplace and typically includes a combination of design, development and manufacturing ramp-up times.
• Engineering Change Order Cycle Time – A measure of how rapidly design changes or modifications to existing products can be implemented all the way through documentation processes and volume production.

Another idea that I wanna run by you is: where does it state that it has to be monitored monthly, it might be that some processes can only be monitored effectively on a semestrial basis or even annual.

Any thoughts?

Regards
Andrei P
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#5
I am having a similar issue with this clause and working to update our scoreboards before our recertification audit.

Our Internal Auditor wrote us a nonconformity for lacking both an effectiveness and an efficiency metric for each process. We already have metrics defined for each process (some with multiple metrics), but according to him they represent one or the other and there should be both.

In my opinion, if we are tracking metrics that make sense for each process that should be enough to conform? If a metric is not meeting target it is going to be a red flag to investigate.
Your internal auditor is "correct." The standard says effectiveness AND efficiency. So you need one of each. They stared emphasizing it a few years ago. You can us the same metrics for multiple processes to keep you numbers in check. Good luck.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#6
Thank you very much everyone,

I really appreciate all your thoughts.
I did some research and I`ve found something which it might be interesting.
• The rate of New Product Introduction – Indicates how rapidly new products can be introduced to the marketplace and typically includes a combination of design, development and manufacturing ramp-up times.
• Engineering Change Order Cycle Time – A measure of how rapidly design changes or modifications to existing products can be implemented all the way through documentation processes and volume production.

Another idea that I wanna run by you is: where does it state that it has to be monitored monthly, it might be that some processes can only be monitored effectively on a semestrial basis or even annual.

Any thoughts?

Regards
Andrei P
There is no monthly requirement. Some will have enough data for monthly analysis, others will not. We do most on a quarterly basis.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D IATF 16949 SI 10, External non-accredited lab IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
M Scope of Combined ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 QMS - Non-automotive customers ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
S Can we provide training plan as corrective action for IATF 16949 Non conformity? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
P IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.2.3 - Justification for non-certified suppliers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 14
M IATF 16949 - Capability study on non critical dimensions? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
B IATF 16949: Definition Major/Minor Non-conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
Crimpshrine13 IATF 16949 Audits to include Processes and Products from Non Subscribing Customers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 20
Sidney Vianna Tesla Lacks Major Automotive Quality Certifications such as IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
W Looking for IATF 16949 (and ISO 17025) QMS software Suggestions Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 8
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News IATF News - Top 10 IATF 16949 nonconformities and more..... IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
B IATF 16949 clause 10.2 - requirements following a customer complaint. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
C IATF 16949:2016 Major NC pertaining to 7.1.5.2.1 Calibration/verification records IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
R How many process maps are adequate for a company for IATF 16949? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 17
O IATF 16949 News Upcoming Changes to IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
V IATF 16949 GM CSR 10.2.4 Error-proofing requirement IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D IATF 16949 Clause 7.2.2 - On the job training IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
L IATF 16949 8.3 Exclusions Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
D IATF 16949 7.3.1 Awareness- Supplemental IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Q IATF 16949 8.4.2.4 Supplier Monitoring IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
J Implementation, establishment and certification of IATF 16949. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
xfngrs 3 year audit cycle IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
D IATF 16949 Process Map IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 19
Vader22 IATF 16949 extended manufacturing site help IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
D IATF 16949 Certification and Letter of Conformance expiry (Help!!!) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
D AS9100 VS IATF 16949 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
Ashland78 Need IATF 16949 ISO Gap Analysis Excel File Internal Auditing 3
T Justification of "Design Excluded" in IATF 16949 Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
Sidney Vianna Job Opening in the USA - IATF 16949 Lead Auditor Position Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
Ron Rompen IATF 16949 8.5.1.4 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
P IATF 16949:2016 Letter of conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
S IATF 16949 - Summary at a glance Clause wise - changes from ISO TS IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
T IATF 16949 Recording inspection results IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S IATF 16949 Supplier selection criteria 8.4.1.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
D IATF 16949 M&TE Laboratory scope IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
M IATF 16949 SI # 10: Integrated self-calibration of measurement equipment- Needs for explanation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J IATF 16949 Calibration/Verification records question ISO 26262 - Road vehicles – Functional safety 6
D Bulk Materials (Greases) and IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J IATF 16949 Internal Audit question - Auditor's responsibility Internal Auditing 6
S IATF 16949 Internal Audit Example IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 20
B Remote IATF 16949 audit preparation General Auditing Discussions 10
R IATF 16949 Certification for new site with transferred product--what is the impact with CSR and scorecards? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
B IATF 16949 Cert Expire- New certification body IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M IATF 16949 - Audit of Remote Location/Support Site and IT IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
O Informational Ford Motor Company Customer Specific Requirements for IATF 16949:2016 - 08 Jan 2021 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
B Updated IATF 16949 - Will IATF 16949 get revised when ISO 9001:202X is released? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
O Release of Sanctioned Interpretations (SIs) related to Rules 5th Edition and Sanctioned Interpretations related to IATF 16949:2016 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
S Thoughts on managing ISO 9001, 13485, IATF 16949 and 17025 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
P IATF 16949 requirement - error-proofing in control plan IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
R IATF 16949 - Outsourcing of internal audits Internal Auditing 11

Similar threads

Top Bottom