IATF 9.1.1.1 Monitoring and Measurement of Manufacturing Processes

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#1
Anyone want to breakdown IATF 16949 9.1.1.1 for me. I have no clue what they are talking about. We make stamped components.

Para 1 requires process studies on all new manufacturing processes to verify capability and provide additional input for process control.

Sounds to me like APQP and PPAP duplication, no? It doesn't lay out any specific CPK requirements.

Para 2 talks about verification that the PFD, PFMEA and control plan are implemented.

Sounds like manufacturing process audit stuff, no?

Para 4 talks about a reaction plan for characteristics that are not statistically capable or unstable.

Based on what? What if it is not statistically capable, but stable?

I am at a complete loss on this section. It seems like either duplication or overkill.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

JerryJ

#2
For Para 1
When we start a new job (stamping's also) we will take the characteristics that we are going to check in-process (fixture checks, trim lines, hole locations etc) and do a random 30 pc. cap study just to make sure that the process is stable. And if there is anything that the customer calls out then we will do those requests also. We use the 1.67 ppk / 1.33cpk and if the study's do not pass then adjustments will be made before we do the PPAP run. But we do not submit all the studies with the PPAP unless they are requested.
 
R

Rodrigo Avles

#3
Greetings Golfman25!

Were you able to find the answers to your questions? I have the same doubts as you and I can not find help to clear my doubts.
 

Sebastian

Trusted Information Resource
#5
It is useless, but ...

Paragraph 1.
I see there reference to pre-launch activity. Final opportunity to answer a question: "Does a process we have designed and developed is mature enough to move it to serial conditions?". Based on satisfactory capability results we will be allowed to transform pre-launch control plan to serial one and instead of 100% inspection put there sampling.

Paragraph 2.
First sentence want us to perform post-SOP process study to know how much our process get deteriorated comparing to PPAP timing. Second one presents "content" of manufacturing process audit.

Paragraph 3.
It is making us aware of "classic" cases having impact on process/product capability, which unrecorded can lead us to false conclusions related to process condition.

Paragraph 4.
It points out SPC/capability study as a trigger of activities aiming correcting process, e.g. through change of setup. There are two scenarios - consecutive measurement results show stable growing/decreasing value trend while capability value is worsening. Second one is when consecutive measurement values do not create any trend (as expected) because it is set of unjustifiable "ups and downs", but capability value is still satisfactory. Both request initiation of reaction plan.

For stamping process we expect stable trend starting from poor capability, then improving and finally worsening before tool recovery. If there are no significant process events and trend is not developing as expected, it has to trigger a reaction plan.
 
#6
Hello All. I too need some clarification on this clause just for sanity purposes, lol.

In recent audit my org was dinged clause 9.1.1.1d due to the fact we have variable spec ranges listed on control plan for critical characteristics being 100% tested during Assembly process, but its actually a pass or fail with no recorded data other than than the scrap qty for the particular test being performed.

On the other hand, Management team wants to dispute saying the scrap results for the test is the data along with the masters checks performed at beginning of shift and the R&R of the tester is the Capability study. However, the QE, Auditor, along with myself do not classify that as appropriate capability study or variable data records.

I am needing expert advise to better understand the needs of this requirement.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Q IATF 16949 8.4.2.4 Supplier Monitoring IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
P IATF 16949 8.4.2.4 Supplier Monitoring IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
P IATF 16949 - Monitoring Suppliers for Premium Freight IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
E IATF 16949 Cl. 9.1.2 - Monitoring Process Performance IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
B IATF 16949 Section Clause 8.3.4.1 - Monitoring - Design and Development Input(s) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
T IATF 16949 Control Plan and Process Monitoring Requirement(s) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
Sidney Vianna Tesla Lacks Major Automotive Quality Certifications such as IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
W Looking for IATF 16949 (and ISO 17025) QMS software Suggestions Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 8
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News IATF News - Top 10 IATF 16949 nonconformities and more..... IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
B Establishing topics for IATF internal audit processes Internal Auditing 9
B IATF 16949 clause 10.2 - requirements following a customer complaint. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
C IATF 16949:2016 Major NC pertaining to 7.1.5.2.1 Calibration/verification records IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
R How many process maps are adequate for a company for IATF 16949? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 17
A IATF Non-Conformance 5 Why IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
O IATF 16949 News Upcoming Changes to IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
D Is IATF certification required when customer doesn't require it? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 19
A Laboratory scope on the IATF IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
V IATF 16949 GM CSR 10.2.4 Error-proofing requirement IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
W Minor NC - IATF Rules 5th Edition Sanctioned Interpretations against 4.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L Internal audits for IATF IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L IATF and ISO9001 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
D IATF NC Interaction of process diagram - Missing contingency plan Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 9
D IATF 16949 Clause 7.2.2 - On the job training IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
G IATF Remote Location audit timing IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News IATF Performance Complaint Management System (IATF CMS) within the IATF Database IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
malasuerte Resourcing for ISO and or IATF? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
G IATF 7.1.5.2.1 Calibration/verification records :Program/software verification IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L IATF 16949 8.3 Exclusions Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
M IATF external audit NC closure IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
D IATF 16949 7.3.1 Awareness- Supplemental IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
W IATF 9.2.2.1 Internal Audit how to determine risk IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
J Implementation, establishment and certification of IATF 16949. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
D IATF mandatory KPI? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
xfngrs 3 year audit cycle IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
D IATF 16949 Process Map IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 19
Vader22 IATF 16949 extended manufacturing site help IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
J PROBLEM SOLVING - IATF and GM CSR IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
D IATF 16949 Certification and Letter of Conformance expiry (Help!!!) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
D AS9100 VS IATF 16949 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
Ashland78 Need IATF 16949 ISO Gap Analysis Excel File Internal Auditing 3
J Internal Audit Schedule IATF Internal Auditing 4
D IATF Requirements if remote plant has no interface with OEMs who are part of IATF? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
G IATF NC - Contingency Planning IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
T Justification of "Design Excluded" in IATF 16949 Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
Sidney Vianna Job Opening in the USA - IATF 16949 Lead Auditor Position Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
Ron Rompen IATF 16949 8.5.1.4 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
I Work Instruction Update- IATF Impact IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
P IATF 16949:2016 Letter of conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
D IATF PROCESSES IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D IATF 16949 SI 10, External non-accredited lab IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom