IEC 60601-1 Essential Performance - Is the signal accuracy specification an essential requirement?

shimonv

Trusted Information Resource
#1
Hi all,
The IEC 60601-1 defines essential performance as:
"performance of a clinical function, other than that related to BASIC SAFETY, where loss or degradation beyond the limits specified by the MANUFACTURER results in an unacceptable RISK

NOTE ESSENTIAL PERFORMANCE is most easily understood by considering whether its absence or degradation would result in an unacceptable RISK."


My system has a signal accuracy specification. Loss or degradation of it could result in unacceptable risk.
My system also as a signal quality indicator that constantly monitors the signals. If the signal accuracy specification is outside the spec it alerts the user and the procedure is suspended.

Question: Is the signal accuracy specification an essential requirement?

Thanks,
Shimon
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Benjamin Weber

Trusted Information Resource
#2
The way you describe it, you actually answered the question yourself - Yes. (Maybe you want to re-evaluate this in detail)

The point now is, how to deal with the consequences? How works the signal quality indicator? What can go wrong, during signal quality evaluation? I guess this is done by software? Is the software development 62304 compliant? Usually the probability of software failure should be considered 1 (it will fail for sure). Your system shall be single fault safe, and your software will fail? What other instance do you have? Do you have another hardware supervising the processor, e.g. another independent processor?

Are the alarms 60601-1-8 compliant?

Does your signal output require calibration? If yes, what can go wrong during the calibration process?....

A lot of question can be raised in combination with essential performance.
 

shimonv

Trusted Information Resource
#3
Hi Benjamin,
So what you are saying is, unless I have bulletproof controls for an important clinical function - it should be listed as essential performance. Correct?

I understand the logic but for the sake of electrical safety the don't challenge the robustness of mitigations, just check that it works in the framework of the standard.
Have you seen a 60601-1 report without essential requirements?
 
Last edited:

Benjamin Weber

Trusted Information Resource
#4
Ask the other way around: Have I seen Test reports WITH essentiell performance? Rarely.

ME equipment where only 60601-1 applies usually don't have EP. A lot of ME equipment can simply turn off without posing any harm to anybody. And you have be careful to not confuse basic safety and essential performance, as i wrote earlier.

An electrostimulating device's clinical function is the output of an electrical current to the patient. If the output is specified to be maximum 1 mA, a false output of 100 mA means, it is out of specs. But I would not see essential performance here. Why? Because this is a loss of basic safety. The device does something, that it should not. It gives the patient an electrical shock.

But if the output hast to be within a certain range (let's say 1 mA +- 0.2 mA) and an output out of this range (let's say 1.5 mA) leads to an unacceptable risk, like a assumed therapeutic success is mit given and the patient is harmed by this, this would be essential performance (not an electrical shock, this would be loss of basic safety). My example may be Bad with respect to leakage currwnt limits. But i Just want to emphasize the difference between EP and BS.

A lot of particular standards defined EP for those devices. In this case the manufacturer doesn't have much choice.

When you conclude, that your device has a clinical function, that could lead to serious harm to a patient (i.e. unacceptable risk), if this function does not work as it should, you shall make sure, that this does not happen.

If the sensor ist specified to be accurate +-5% and a false sensor output of -6% leads to a wrong or no therapeutic intervention, you have to implement risk control measures, to mitigate this risk. This may be an alarm. But what If the sensor calibration was wrong in the first place? The sensor then seems to give an accurate reading and no alarm is given. You have to implement corresponding risk control measures regarding the calibration process.

There might be a way out: Does the operator have to rely on your sensor output? Or is this just an auxilliary tool and the operator always has to consider other factors?

For example pulse oximeters: A wrong sensor output of a false high oxygen saturation may lead to an unacceptable risk, e.g. patient is not ventilated correctly and suffers from hypoxemia, because the operator thinks the oxygen saturation ist fine. This would be essential performance according to the definition of 60601-1.

But usually pulse oximeter manufacturers say: The operator always has to perform another method for determination of oxygen saturation, e.g. blood gas analysis with an arterial blood sample. So this is not essential performance anymore.
 

Tidge

Quite Involved in Discussions
#5
To help teams think about Essential Performance, I offer the following kernels to help them get started:

(1) An Essential Performance statement should succinctly make it obvious both what is the ME device you are manufacturing but also the clinical reason why someone is buying this device.
(2) The Essential Performance statement will be modified to address areas of unacceptable risk that would arise from the use of the device from both elements of (1).

The most useful essential performance statements are short. They are aligned with marketing materials (i.e. don't mislabel/mis-market the device) but typically an EP statement does not parrot the 'sales pitch'. In my experience, 'accuracy statements' don't belong in the EP, unless it is discovered through risk analysis that an inaccuracy is explicitly recognized as leading to an unacceptable risk. It has also been my experience that it is very difficult for teams to resist including 'features' of their device when thinking about Essential Performance. I cannot stress how important it is to avoid this trap.

The most important reasons (in the context of 60601-1 3rd edition) for have a clearly codified Essential Performance is to assist a Testing Laboratory to verify that ME devices still meet their Essential Performance requirements while being subjected to the basic safety tests of 60601-1. An example that is commonly given: under the 2nd edition, a ventilator could be certified to meet 60601-1 as long as it didn't catch on fire when tipped over... even if it stopped working. In the 3rd edition, the non-functioning ventilator (when tipped over) wouldn't meet EP and would not be certified.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
W IEC 60601 - Essential performance c.2.34 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
rezayatmand IEC 60601-2-18 Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-18: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of endoscopic equipmen IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
Z In which country is essential to have and IEC 60601 CB Report? Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
D IEC 60601-1 - Essential performance doesn't make sense IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 10
D IEC 60601-1 - Performance limits for essential performance IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
K IEC 60601-1 and Essential Performance IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
M IEC 60601 - Limits of agreement as Essential Performance IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
D IEC 60601-2-44: 202.101 Immunity Testing of Essential Performance IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
L "Potential" Essential Performance in IEC 60601-2-54 (Definition) IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 9
A Essential Performance in IEC 3rd edition of the 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
R IEC 60601-1 - Magnesium oxide used for the electrical insulation of heating elements IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
M Is IEC 60601-1-2 required by FDA for all electronic medical devices? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
Z IEC 60601-2-25; Frequency response test Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
N IEC 60601-1-1 - Stress test, reference voltage IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
R IEC 60601-1:2005+AMD1:2012+AMD2:2020 CSV IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
B IEC 60601 - Creepage Distance - Relay that acts as a means of physical mechanical protection Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 0
T Single Fault Condition IEC 60601 Clause 8.7.1 shorting Cr/Cl in Patient Applied Part IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
M What to Expect from Next IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2 Amendments? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
D IEC 60601-1 - Service life testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 8
R Hand transmitted vibration 9.6.3 of IEC 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
A IEC 60601 11.2.2.1 Risk of Fire in an Oxygen Rich Environment, Source of Ignition IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
E PEMS Hazards - IEC 60601 Clause 14.6 - Internal data use - Pressure sensor IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
B IEC 60601-2-43 - Clause 203.6.103 - Physical button? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
M IEC 60601-1 1988 - Device developed in 2012 with standard of 1988 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
A IEC 60601-1 Dielectric Strength test for battery operated devices IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
E IEC 60601-1 - Unearthed Medical Device Metal Parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
JoCam Failure to test Class I medical device to IEC 60601-1-11 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
R IEC 60601-1 - Different methods of achievement of the isolation IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
K What is mean by Oxygen Rich Environment as per the IEC 60601-1 clause no 11.2.2 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
K Dielectric strength test as per IEC 60601-1 -Infant incubator IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
A Unused SIP/SOPs - IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
K Proper document of SMPS used in infant warmer for IEC 60601-1 testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
K Sequence of testing in IEC 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
B IEC 60601-2-10 - Accuracy of Pulse Parameters - Required Measurement Uncertainty IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
B Has anyone done an IEC 60601-1 gap analysis to IEC 60335? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
K Question on whether IEC 60601-2-62 standard is applied IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
DitchDigger IEC 60601-1 subclause 5.1 - Adequate evaluation in lieu of testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
B IEC 60601 Cl. 8.4.3 - ME EQUIPMENT intended to be connected to a power source by a plug / Plug discharge IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
B Transformer Requirements - IEC 60601-1 vs. IEC 61558-2-15 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
T Clearance and Creepage according to Subclause 8.9.1 for MOPP IEC 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
A IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-2-2 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
M IEC 60601-1-2 EMC Tables IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
T Iec 60601 Impedance and current-carrying capability IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
A Bookmarking my security protected IEC 60601-1 .pdf file IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 16
G Is impact test according to IEC 60601-1 applicable for HAND-HELD equipment if also classified as BODY-WORN? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
E ECG device without ECG REPORTS - IEC 60601-2-25: 2011 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
C IEC 60601-1-8, difference between table 4 and annex D IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
P Scope of application for IEC 60601-1-11 Medical electrical equipment — Part 1-11 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
M IEC 60601 7.1.3 Durability of Markings - Methylated Spirit or Ethanol? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
C ABS plastic : which IEC 60601-1 tests to redo? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom