Illuminance Meter - Extending Manufacturer's Recommended Calibration Frequency

M

mshell

#1
We currently have 2 illuminance meters being calibrated annually by the manufacturer. I have reviewed the records of calibration for the last 3 years and found that the meters have been in calibration each time we have sent them out. The manufacturer certificate (traceable to NIST) requires annual calibration. I would like to extend the calibration period to every 2 years based on minimal use and previous test results. Can I do this without losing the NIST traceability?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#2
mshell said:
Can I do this without losing the NIST traceability?
Yes. Calibration intervals are not related to traceability, unless whomever is doing the calibration is destroying their records after 12 months, which is highly unlikely. You determine the proper interval for your application, not the manufacturer or calibration source.
 

Jerry Eldred

Forum Moderator
Super Moderator
#3
The general rule is that you "may" extend interval when in-tolerance history says the probability is they will remain in-tolerance for the new longer interval, and you "must" decrease the interval when out-of-tolerance history so dictates.

Depending on what you must comply with, it may or may not be reasonable to double the interval. I ran the NCSLI RP1 Method A3 Interval Tester, and at 95% in-tolerance target, the longest new recommended interval was 14.4months (I varied % in-tolerance all the way to 1% and the confidence factor all the way down to 1% as well, and still only came up with 14.4 months as the maximum recommended interval. This is based on the National Conference of standards Laboratories Recommended Practices.

However, on the more practical side, if you really want to adjust the interval to 24 months, I would recommend reviewing the certificates, and perhaps calling the lab that cal'd them for you, and ask to determine if the units were ever adjusted or optimized by them during any of those calibrations. If they have never been adjusted or optimized, that would indicate that the units may have remained in-tolerance for the three years, and 24 month interval may be fully appropriate. Again, depending on what you must comply with (ISO, FDA, FAA, etc.), it may or may not be important for you to document that. The calibration interval is, after all is said and done, the statistically probable amount of time (or usage) within which an instrument may be expected (to a defined degree of confidence) to remain within specified tolerances.

As the first repy indicated, it will not magically go out of tolerance on the due date. What does happen is that from the instant the calibration label is applied (kind of like magic - sorry, it's Monday morning) the is a statistical increase in the probability that it will not remain in specs., which increases until the time at which it will likely be out of tolerance.

The more history you acquire, the higher the confidence in how long it will remain in tolerance. Method A3 uses the average interval and the maximum interval in statistically determining new intervals. IMPORTANT NOTE: When adjusting intervals, use the actual amount of time between calibrations (old cal date to new cal date), not the assigned interval (12 months). If you went significantly over 12 months, during any of the previous calibrations on your meters, that could increase the allowable new interval (per that recommended practice).

Also, as was previously posted, the customer assigns the interval (according to IEC/ISO17025). The manufacturer's interval is not binding, it is their recommendation. What that is based on depends on the manufacturer. You might even talk with someone at the manufacturer and ask them what it is based on, and what the risks might be with a two year interval.

Could be at each calibration that they do a periodic maintenance on the optics that could degrade (surface contamination buildup, for example) if left for two years.

It may well be fully acceptable to go two years (and in my opinion, there is reasonable likelihood that is the case). But I feel duty bound to share the risk potential.

There are two opposing forces in any circumstance where the interval is adjusted:

1. COST: if the interval is too short, too much is spent on unneeded calibrations.

2. RISK/COST: if the interval is too long, there is ALWAYS statistical increase in the risk of undesired out-of-tolerance. I added COST to the second statement, because that is an often overlooked potential impact of too long an interval. The undesired out-of-tolerance may result in "inaccurate" decision based on an out-of-tolerance reading.

Both of the above must always be factored into setting of initial intervals, and adjusting them. How the instrument is used and stored impacts how well it retains tolerance. How it is used also determines it's potential impact.
 
G

Graeme

#4
To add to the excellent information from Jerry and JSW05 --

Another part of the risk/cost consideration on extending intervals is this: if one of the meters is found to be out of tolerance, you are required to evaluate the impact of the OOT condition on the product and, if necessary, recall all items that meter was used on back to the last time it was known to be in tolerance. That can be a very substantial cost.

An "insurance policy" that can help with this is the practice of making regular measurements of a product item (or other appropriate stable artifact) that is reserved for use as a check standard. At specified intervals (depending on your use of the meter) the check standard is measured in exactly the same way as routine product measurements, and the results are plotted on a control chart. Examination of the control chart will indicate potential problems and action may be taken much sooner than waiting for the next calibration results. The "last known good date" is immediately before the control chart starts to indicate a problem. Naturally, a precondition for this is that the meaurment process is in a state of statistical control.

While agreeing that the manufacturer's recommended interval (if any) is only a guideline, if you are in a regulated industry there are other considerations as well. In many cases the regulating agency mandates that the manufacturer-suggested interval shall be used unless other conditions are met. For the agency I am most familiar with (FAA), any change of the interval must be justified on the basis of statistical analysis of actual data and a defined end-of-interval reliability goal. That means, using Jerry's calculations as an example, you could only justify extending the interval to 14 months. (It also means that any of the reactive methods listed in RP-1 can not be used.)
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Load Cell Calibration using a totalizer on a flow meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
B Health Canada - Blood Glucose Meter Registration Canada Medical Device Regulations 0
Crimpshrine13 Calibration of pH Meter Probe Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3
S Calibration - Isolated current meter - Measuring patient auxiliary leakage current Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 4
K Calibration of Dose Area Product (DAP) Meter in our Class IIb X-Ray Medical Device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
I Uncalibrated source to calibrated meter, then compare to UUT General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
D What is the exact Temperature Coefficient Value to be set on a Conductivity Meter? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
G Calculating Tolerance of a Panel Meter with a 2 degrees of an Arc General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
T Adding an adapter to a Torque Meter to change the Range Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
GURU SDI Measurement Variation in a Coating Thickness Meter Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
C Flow Meter calibration for mixed gases Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 1
C Flow meter for medical device application Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
D Hand-held Digital Tension Meter Calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
Anerol C Gage R&R for Tension Meter Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
A German MTK (MPBetreibV ? 11) Blood Pressure Meter Requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Calibration of a Power Meter Model Hm8115-2 (Hameg) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
T Calibration procedure for Bubble Gas Flow Meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
B Digital Torque Meter Gage R&R General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
M In house Volt Meter Calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
P Is it necessary to show Model Number on the Labeling (meter box, label and manual)? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
S Which Torque Meter do I choose based on CpK studies ? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
D State Past Due on its own Meter Inspection ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
R When does a pH Meter require Calibration? Calibration Frequency (Interval) 7
W Digital Multi-Meter Calibration Procedure for various Meter Brands and Functions General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
S Calibration Frequency for a Measurement Device: Vibration Meter Calibration Frequency (Interval) 4
K Survey Meter Calibration - Accredited Laboratory required? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
B Problem Calibrating a Krautkramer DMS 2 Ultrasonic Thickness Meter Calibration Frequency (Interval) 2
W How to verify/calibrate a Neptune Water Meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S Dew Point Meter: DPL4000 - help needed Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
C Flow Meter Calibration - Outside Calibration Service vs. In-House Calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
N Laboratory that is able to Calibrate Dew Point Meter up to 60?Cdp - Needed General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
D Conductivity Meter Specification - What Is Accuracy +/- 1% Full Scale + 1 digit General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 15
Jerry Eldred Where to get UV Intensity Meter Calibrated General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
U Calibration of a Flux Magnet Meter - Any resource in Indonesia? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
E Calibration Frequency of Reference Magnets for Gauss Meter Calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
B ESD Mats on Workbenches and ESD Surface Resistivity Meter Readings Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
R Conductivity Meter Qualification Guide Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
M Newbie in Gage R&R - Gloss Meter and Thickness Measurement Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 7
R Qualification of Water Bath & pH Meter Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5
R Power Meter Calibration Accuracy Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 4
B In-House pH Meter Calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 13
N Chilled Mirror Dew Point Meter for Humidity Measurement Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 2
V Calibration procedure for Torque Meter Needed General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
D Need suggestions for a mobile Spectrophotometer (a.k.a. color meter) Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
G Help in understanding my Gage R&R results on a pH meter Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
R Validation of a 1 meter rule with a Standard General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
R Calibration of on-line pH meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
ScottK Soliciting recommendations for a fast turnaround calibration house - Mass Flow Meter Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
V Calibration method for a Neptune 10 Water Meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
M Zebedee CL-100 Clarity Meter Calibration Procedure needed General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom