Interesting Discussion Interesting view of EU Authorised Representative under MDR

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#1
An interesting interpretation of the AR provisions in the MDR, from BSI's blog:
If you are a non-European manufacturer with medical devices on the European market, you will have already an authorized representative (AR) in the European Union (EU). The moment you claim compliance with the new European regulation on medical devices (2017/745 - MDR), your existing AR may become instantly obsolete. It would then be illegal to place your devices on the EU market.

Under the current system (MDD 93/42/EEC) anybody can be an authorized representative and often all that is required of the AR in practice is to be able to pass a message from a Competent Authority to the manufacturer. For many manufacturers, the AR is not a significant factor in the compliance paradigm.

Let’s suppose that you are using an external authorised representative, i.e. not somebody within your organisation.

Dealing with the new AR is like moving to another universe where the laws of physics are different. The new AR must have at their disposal a person responsible for regulatory compliance with appropriate qualifications attesting regulatory expertise. The AR must verify the manufacturer’s regulatory compliance and terminate the relationship if it finds the manufacturer to be in non-compliance. The AR will be highly motivated to terminate the relationship in such situations as it will become liable for the manufacturer’s defective products. The loss of an AR will immediately bar the manufacturer from placing the medical devices represented by the AR on the EU market. In addition it is likely to trigger an investigation of the manufacturer as the termination must be notified to the AR’s Competent Authority. The Notified Body may have to recognise that the manufacturer is in non-compliance and declare a major non-conformity. In the worst case, it may have to provisionally withdraw the manufacturer’s certification until the non-compliance has been corrected. Since importers and distributors cannot make non-conforming devices available, this cascade of events may have an adverse effect on the supply chain to the market. It is unlikely that the manufacturer will be able to find a new AR quickly as the transfer must be based on an agreement with the ex-AR and a formal process that will allow the prospective new AR to quickly become aware of the alleged problems of the manufacturer.

With proper preparation, the situation does not have to be this bleak.

The manufacturer and the AR must mutually agree to a mandate that determines the tasks that the AR will be responsible for. There are certain responsibilities that the manufacturer cannot delegate and certain tasks that the AR must undertake. Because of the high probability of an acrimonious conflict between the two, the negotiation on the mandate should cover also arrangements for conflict resolution that avoids the commercial Armageddon made possible by the MDR. The AR would probably feel much less inclined to terminate the manufacturer too easily if the agreement included provisions that would extend the manufacturer’s product liability insurance to cover the AR.

The above scenario relates to external ARs that are not part of the manufacturer’s organisation. Imagine the above situation when the AR is within the manufacturer’s own organisation! It is almost unimaginable that an employee who acts as the authorised representative for his own employer would pull the plug in this manner. The law nevertheless suggests that this could happen. So how would the internal authorised representative resolve the situation? But that is another story…

Author: Mika Reinikainen, LL.M., MBA, Managing Director at Abnovo Ltd.
Authorised representative concerns - Deadline 2020
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#2
Not sure exactly what's new here. I in particular have been saying more or less the same thing for manufacturers in Brazil for some years now, as the new "cross check" requirements of the MDR (as I call backstabbing (Vetores de Aperto De Mão E Armas Parceria De Negócios Com A Rivalidade E Desconfiança Ilustração Em Vetor Conceito Empresarial e mais imagens de Stabbed in the Back - iStock) /we are not friends anymore situation :p) were put in place to prevent problems, but on the other hand will make certain arrangements much more difficult. The AR is in fact only one of those arrangements (several of my clients have already have a lot of trouble related to MDR implementation and importers/distributors). Also, some ARs have already been getting out of the market due to this situation (in particular the liability clause). It's easier when you are not accountable :p

On the other hand, a lot of people still do not see to understand the scope and grounds of these changes, and the effects. For example, in one of my last MDR trainings, I was discussing the need to revise all contracts with all the economic operators, in particular in regards to the new responsibilities and the verification requirements that the importer and distributor have to perform (including the importer "mark"of conformity") and one attendee said that she saw no problems because THEIR NOTIFIED BODY said that they should not worry about that, that the competent authorities would evaluate the importer and distributors and that anything that the importer or distributor did wrong, they would be punished (and I won't even start mentioning how the NB should not say stupid things that are outside their jurisdiction and, it seems, their knowledge :p). When I mentioned that the CAs do not perform this kind of evaluation, and that, in the event of a NC product reaching the market it would be THEIR product, and even if the importer/distributor did something wrong, the CAs would target THEIR product, the attendee seemed to begin to grasp the reality.
 
Last edited:

Watchcat

Trusted Information Resource
#3
The requirement for foreign businesses to have a local authorized representative is not limited to the EU nor to medical devices. It is a near-universal practice in international business.

Governments typically want foreign companies to have a local authorized representative that is physically located and incorporated within their jurisdictions, because those entities are unambiguously subject to local laws. This means they have an entity they can prosecute under their their own laws rather than having to struggle with international law.

Like many things in the MDR, it's nothing new, just spelled out in more detail. There is legal liability attached to serving as the authorized representative of a foreign company.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Informational Interesting read for risk managers – The Psychology of Prediction Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Interesting article form the UNIDO Magazine - CSR: a wolf in sheep’s clothing? Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 16
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion ISO 9001 audits from the perspective of registrants' customers - an interesting paper Registrars and Notified Bodies 0
Sidney Vianna Informational The role of the quality professional - an interesting video by CQI Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 1
M Medical Device News EU interesting developments – embracing MDSAP and UDI alignment Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
J ASQ Chicago Training Institute - If any of you are interesting in teaching ASQ Certification preparation ASQ - American Society for Quality 1
N Dream Log - Occasionally I have some interesting Dreams Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 27
H Interesting Article:Weak Supplier Relations Costing Big 3 Automakers, Nissan Billions World News 4
SteveK Interesting Medical Device Database Site (666,413 items listed) Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
B Share ideas to make Management Review more interesting Management Review Meetings and related Processes 4
N Interesting Purchase Order for its Terms and Conditions Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 82
B Very interesting article concerning MSA (Measurement System Analysis) Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 8
V Medical Device Conference - May 2014 - Interesting topics and presentations Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 1
A Interesting article - Economics of Environmentalism Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 0
Hershal Interesting Israel Holiday Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 6
Randy Interesting lady I met today Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
S Interesting ITAR related question from our Certification Body ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
R AS9100C vs. AS9101D 7.6 c.) - Interesting how meanings change AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 2
J Interesting Nonconformance During Upgrade Audit to ISO 9001:2008 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 27
H How to perform interesting PFMEA (Process FMEA) Training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
M Interesting article - Analysis of Risk: Are Current Methods Theoretically Sound? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 7
GStough Verisys Registrars - Interesting Statements on Their Web Site Registrars and Notified Bodies 2
RoxaneB My train ride with the world's most interesting person... Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 29
J Interesting humor cartoons and videos for quality awareness training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
D Interesting graphic of BCS (college football coaches' ballots) Poll Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
V Interesting quiz, case studies or exercises for AS9120 needed AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 4
Steve Prevette An interesting paper on Lean Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 13
Q How can I make the QMS (Quality Management System) interesting to employees? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 38
Jim Wynne An interesting antivirus experience - A "dynamic" test After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 14
Claes Gefvenberg Interesting Cove signatures Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 65
F CAPA Training - Tips on making CAPA training topics interesting! Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
K Management Buy In - Management has presented some interesting challenges IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
Jim Wynne Interesting Signs - Possible new OSHA requirement? Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 7
V Interesting presentation about QUALITY Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 8
A Need help with creating useful, interesting and good internal web site about QMS!!! After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 5
J Some interesting information for those who are interested in ISO/TS 16949:2002 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Claes Gefvenberg An interesting audit coming up - First combined ISO 9001 / 14001 surveillance audit General Auditing Discussions 6
E Some Interesting Sites Unrelated to Quality Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 11
A Interesting audit request - Full reaudit when separating R&D from division General Auditing Discussions 6
WALLACE FPS (Ford production system) - Does anybody have any interesting comments? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 8
Marc An Interesting Failure Analysis - Ejection Seat Failure Nonconformance and Corrective Action 8
A Firestone Articles (Other Interesting Articles) World News 35
B Keeping the induction group awake - Interesting training exercises to share? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 14
D Interesting Web Sites, Boards & other resources on Stats Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
John Predmore A Balanced view of statistical tests Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
Marc Printable Discussion Thread View Elsmar Xenforo Forum Software Instructions and Help 0
A How to view supplier APQP timeline and do risk management APQP and PPAP 4
T Directors View - Standards like ISO 9001 are "Just a TICK in the BOX" ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Chennaiite Chaos --> Bird's eye view, simplify & visualize Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 0
S Can I view listed drug products on FDA website similar to listed medical devices? Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 4
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom