J
Hello all:
I'm now working with a "client" and re-devloping/updating from the 1994 to the 2000 standards..
What I would really be interested in is what viewpoint should be taken from an internal standpoint as the difference between a Major and Minor nonconformance...
Seems to me that the differences from an external/registrars view is fairly clear --- Majors are required to be corrected within fewer days and there is a $$$$ penealty attached to them.
Does anyone here actually define in their procedures the differences internally? If so what would be an appropriate "penalty" for a Major finding (assuming of course that Top Management would back it up)
I'm now working with a "client" and re-devloping/updating from the 1994 to the 2000 standards..
What I would really be interested in is what viewpoint should be taken from an internal standpoint as the difference between a Major and Minor nonconformance...
Seems to me that the differences from an external/registrars view is fairly clear --- Majors are required to be corrected within fewer days and there is a $$$$ penealty attached to them.
Does anyone here actually define in their procedures the differences internally? If so what would be an appropriate "penalty" for a Major finding (assuming of course that Top Management would back it up)