I am going to play the devil's advocate here.
Reading your pic, this is what I see: It identifies an
object. This object, could be say, an Internal Audit performed on the Internal Audit System by another Internal Auditor. The objects that I looked at were not audited by me personally, however, it is still my responsibility as owner of that process. Would this be auditing my own work or responsibility, would this be a violation according to the requirements? I think not; which supports my previous responses. I was not the person who perform the last Internal Audit as to note 1 reference of "object." This is where the objectivity is based upon results. The impartiality part of this...yes I can be impartial and objective at the same time.
Maybe I am looking at this outside the box.

Actually looking to see if the intent of the standard was met or not met.