Why do you want that?
OK friends and neighbors, I am not sure if I am just venting, or maybe there is hope (and solutions) yet.
I am putting together our quarterly review report and I asked the folks on our newly implemented 6 sigma team (black belt trainees, working on their first project for certification) to send my a summary of their projects, along with any data they may have to show progress towards meeting our objectives and continual improvement.
I got the following response from one of the "black belts" in waiting: "Why does ISO need to review 6-sigma projects in detail anyway? Isn’t it enough to say for now that we’re developing these projects?"
Now, to give you some background. I was not aware that we were implementing/sending people to six sigma training until the teams were already on their way to the training site(no coordination of information by management?) My job is not "ISO", it is Quality Systems Coordination (um, coordination, does that not imply that there is more than one thing that I am responsible for?)
So my question(s) -
How can anyone not understand how quality management and six sigma are related?
How can someone go through a six sigma training course for black belts and not understand how quality management and six sigma are related?
Am I overly sensitive to be offended by the fact that management AND "trained" six sigma black belt candidates are so oblivious to the fact that quality systems and six sigma are related? You would think that six sigma was the end all-be all, instead of an organized approach to improvement???
What am I missing?
Thanks for any info, hints, or recomendations anyone can give.
OK friends and neighbors, I am not sure if I am just venting, or maybe there is hope (and solutions) yet.
I am putting together our quarterly review report and I asked the folks on our newly implemented 6 sigma team (black belt trainees, working on their first project for certification) to send my a summary of their projects, along with any data they may have to show progress towards meeting our objectives and continual improvement.
I got the following response from one of the "black belts" in waiting: "Why does ISO need to review 6-sigma projects in detail anyway? Isn’t it enough to say for now that we’re developing these projects?"
Now, to give you some background. I was not aware that we were implementing/sending people to six sigma training until the teams were already on their way to the training site(no coordination of information by management?) My job is not "ISO", it is Quality Systems Coordination (um, coordination, does that not imply that there is more than one thing that I am responsible for?)
So my question(s) -
How can anyone not understand how quality management and six sigma are related?
How can someone go through a six sigma training course for black belts and not understand how quality management and six sigma are related?
Am I overly sensitive to be offended by the fact that management AND "trained" six sigma black belt candidates are so oblivious to the fact that quality systems and six sigma are related? You would think that six sigma was the end all-be all, instead of an organized approach to improvement???
What am I missing?
Thanks for any info, hints, or recomendations anyone can give.