Internal vs. External PFMEA Severity Rankings

G

GoKats78

#1
We are in the middle of revisiting our PFMEAs in an effort to make them relevant (after 5 years of struggling to get this project started).

We have come up against an interesting dilemma. The severity ranking guidelines we are using come from Honda and have separate criteria for "Effect on Product (Customer Effect)" and "Effect on Process (Manufacturing/Assembly Effect)"

What happens here is we end up with situations where the internal severity is higher (7 or 8) than the external severity. (usually based on the section of the criteria that states "A portion of the production run may have to be scrapped.") but the effect to the customer is much lower (5 -6: Loss of secondary function - vehicle operable, but comfort/convenience functions inoperable).

We have an internal rule that if the severity of a process is 7 or 8 that limits who (full-time vs. temporary) can run the process. Any changes to that rule will be vetoed by our customer as was driven by them years ago...

We are almost to the point of developing a PFMEA with 2 separate Severity Rankings (and therefore, 2 different RPN's) based on internal vs external issues.

How have others dealt with the issue?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
G

guruprasadb

#2
HI,

We have also implemented the severity ranking by considering the potential effect of failure ---in

Operator Safety:
Next Operation:
Vehicle / Customer:
Govt Regulations:

severity will be ranked cosideration each effect in above category

in some processes we had three RPN 's

I am attaching the sample format for your reference
 

Attachments

Chennaiite

Never-say-die
Trusted Information Resource
#3
We have an internal rule that if the severity of a process is 7 or 8 that limits who (full-time vs. temporary) can run the process. Any changes to that rule will be vetoed by our customer as was driven by them years ago...

We are almost to the point of developing a PFMEA with 2 separate Severity Rankings (and therefore, 2 different RPN's) based on internal vs external issues.

How have others dealt with the issue?
I don't understand your need to develop FMEA with two different Severity rating. Generally, it's the Severity of the most serious effect that influences RPN or risk assessment. Probably, I miss something here? May be you think of projecting lower Severity in your Customer copy in order to avoid his intervention?
 
G

GoKats78

#4
I don't understand your need to develop FMEA with two different Severity rating. Generally, it's the Severity of the most serious effect that influences RPN or risk assessment. Probably, I miss something here? May be you think of projecting lower Severity in your Customer copy in order to avoid his intervention?
No..it has to do with whom can perform the process (full time vs temporary associate)
 
#5
I am not altogether convinced that anything good will come from fiddling too much with proven concepts like FMEA. The basic RPN setup looks pretty solid to me, and I frown a bit when each customer (in this case Honda) persists in coming up with their own homegrown setups. If a supplier has a large number of customers, all of whom require the use of their particular guidelines this will cause nothing but unnecessary confusion and red tape.

In short: Keep it simple, and do try to apply lean concepts to the lean process itself. Otherwise it will become a burden (muda) in its own right.

/Claes
 
G

GoKats78

#6
I am not altogether convinced that anything good will come from fiddling too much with proven concepts like FMEA. The basic RPN setup looks pretty solid to me, and I frown a bit when each customer (in this case Honda) persists in coming up with their own homegrown setups. If a supplier has a large number of customers, all of whom require the use of their particular guidelines this will cause nothing but unnecessary confusion and red tape.



/Claes
I agree...but Honda is over 90% of our business...
 
G

GoKats78

#8
Here is the line in the guidelines causing us all the headaches:
A portion of the production run may have to be scrapped. Deviation from the primary process including decreased line speed or added manpower.
This puts a "7" severity on the process. Almost any process you could have to scrap something if something goes wrong!

What we are new considering is looking more at the second part (Deviation from the primary process including decreased line speed or added manpower.) for internal processes and considering the whole guideline for our customer
 

Chennaiite

Never-say-die
Trusted Information Resource
#9
Here is the line in the guidelines causing us all the headaches:

This puts a "7" severity on the process. Almost any process you could have to scrap something if something goes wrong!

What we are new considering is looking more at the second part (Deviation from the primary process including decreased line speed or added manpower.) for internal processes and considering the whole guideline for our customer
Generally speaking, this understanding seems to make sense for me. What really may also influence the severity rating is the nature of your product, process and the failure mode.

I am saying this because with reference to AIAG Manual, the whole idea of line speed, 100% scrap, additional manpower, etc only go behind exploring what if the effect of a failure mode is detected before reaching the end user. Its true that when it comes to detection of effect, the detection at customer end takes front seat rather than the one before despatch. Hence it makes sense that 100% or portion scrap is more serious at Customer end than at site.
Having said that, we may have to be careful with handling process step such as Heat treatment where the process happens in batches and hence scrap within site may also happen in batches. This may even have disastrous effect on the machining process, where as can go undetected at the customer end assembly. Thats why I believe one should also consider higher level effects such as Major/Significant/Moderate disruption before going any further.
 

Helmut Jilling

Auditor / Consultant
#10
Remember, when evaluating Severity, you evaluate the failure impact on the OE customer and on the end user of the vehicle, and take the higher of the 2 numbers.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Internal and external auditor competency to CSR's IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 20
B Using external FDA and ISO 13485 audit as internal audit Internal Auditing 6
A External Auditor issue with Internal Audits Internal Auditing 7
D Necessity of external watchdog next to internal watchdog ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
Ashok sunder How to determine the internal and external issues in ISO 45001 standard? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
T Relevant internal and external communication - ISO 9001:2015 section 7.4 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
O Examples of the external and internal issues and their risks and opportunities IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Y ISO 9001:2015 Cl. 4.1 Note 1 - External and Internal issues ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
qualprod External/internal issues removed as well? ISO 9001:2015 Cl. 4.1 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
V PPM - Internal PPM / External PPM Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
M How to Document Internal & External Communications - Suggestions/examples pls IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Q Managing Internal/External RNC and Complaints in same Format ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
M Metric/Way to show how Internal DPPM and External DPPM relate to each other Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
P Is Internal and external audit of Account Department applicable to any ISO standard Internal Auditing 5
R Can a external auditor raise a finding that is already identified in Internal Audit ? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
M Internal Audit finding versus External Audit finding General Auditing Discussions 2
G Scope of External & Internal Audits General Auditing Discussions 10
D Combining Internal & External Corrective Action Requests Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
K Free from any Undue Internal and External Pressures - 4.1.5b clarification General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
Z Predicting External PPM Capability from Internal PPM Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1
T ISO 17025 - 4.1.5b Internal/External commercial, financial, and other pressures ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
J Can An External Auditor Also Write The Same Non-Conformance As An Internal Auditor? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
V Most Common Internal/External Audit Observations on Risk Management ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
S Internal and External Audit Programme Implementation Internal Auditing 6
S How to quantify the Benefits of Internal and External OHS audits? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 4
K Can I join External or Online Internal Auditor Courses Apart from my Company...? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
M Internal and External Customer Survey Procedure and Form examples wanted ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
B Critical Action Limits (CAL) for All Internal and External Audit Findings General Auditing Discussions 17
D External Parties performing Internal Audits? TS 16949 Clause 8.2.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
S External Auditor Findings when an Internal Audit found a Nonconformance Yesterday Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 11
S External or Internal Design Change and Responsibilities Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
R ISO 9001 Internal Quality Audit by Consultants (External agency) Internal Auditing 5
D Internal or External PPM form or template wanted Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
P Can External Audits by Customer be treated As Internal Audits AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 21
P 7.6.3 Internal or External Laboratory? Measuring instruments used in production IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
E First external audit coming up, do I need to have performed Internal Audits already? Internal Auditing 15
P External Contract Auditor for Internal Quality Audit Internal Auditing 18
C Document Control for External and Internal Projects (overseas projects) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
A Audit Database that captures internal, external audits - Prime Part 21 manufacturer Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 12
P Internal vs. external audit training course differences? Internal Auditing 18
H Internal / External Auditors from the same Field / Section / Group? Internal Auditing 2
W External Consultant as Internal Auditor - Can NC be issued by TS Auditor? Internal Auditing 18
R ISO 9001 Internal & External Communication Requirements ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
P How do you decide what is an acceptable Internal and External PPM number? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
N Handling External Audits with Internal Vacations General Auditing Discussions 101
A External Audit CAR when Internal Audit CAR is in process? General Auditing Discussions 34
F The difference between External Records vs. Internal Records Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 11
N "For Reference Only" - Internal and External Documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 14
B Internal Audits save you from Non-Conformances on external audits? General Auditing Discussions 16
T Gear / Spline Gaging - Both Internal and External Splines Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom