It's natural to lose faith in the system based on something which you acknowledge isn't true?

Some contributors
did agree with you. You also need to remember that the proportion of the people who read these discussions but don't contribute to them by posting is very large; the number of people who actually post here is the tip of the proverbial iceberg. We have no way of knowing
how many people actually agree or disagree with anything that's posted here, and it's possible that the actual majority agreed with you, and thought that I was full of horse poop. What's actually important is that we both made an effort to express reasoned opinions, and that others might have the opportunity to learn something from it.
Thanks for enlightenment.

Umang
You seem to be taking things personally. I respect you and your experience and your contributions. That doesn't mean that I always must agree with you, or that disagreement
per se is not a
positive force for improvement. Knowledge advances
because of disagreement, not in spite of it.
No no Jim.You can't be more wrong.It's nothing personal and the I hold you in high esteem.In a healthy argument,either I agree to your point of view,or vice-versa;else,we agree to disagree.There is agreement in disagreement,so
the knowledge advances irrespective of any side of the coin facing up.
Umang
I read this as, "If you're going to make a mistake, make it by agreeing with me." In other words, you think I should look past any disagreement I might have with your ideas for fear that you might be offended by my voicing my disagreement. If my interpretation is correct, I disagree.