Investigational Testing - Does the Medical Device have to be "sold"?

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#1
Just wondering:
Part 3 (Medical Devices for Investigational Testing Involving Human Subjects) of the Canadian Medical Device Regulations, SOR 98/282 states:

79 This Part applies to medical devices that are to be imported or sold for investigational testing involving human subjects.
What if you are lending a prototype device for the purposes of gathering data/user-feedback? No money is changing hands, and the facility is based in Canada, so no importation.

Does these regulations still apply? If not, what are the requirements for the case I've described?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

shimonv

Trusted Information Resource
#2
Hi Mark,
It seems the regulator did not address your specific circumstances. BUT we know that Regulatory Affairs in not about money but safety and effectiveness. Section 80 describes the requirements for investigation testing based on the risk level. I think you should follow these guidelines and ignore the financial element. Furthermore, the phrase "imported or sold" doesn't mean that financial transaction is always present.

That is my opinion.

Cheers,
Shimon
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#3
I think you should follow these guidelines and ignore the financial element. Furthermore, the phrase "imported or sold" doesn't mean that financial transaction is always present.
I agree, this is the most conservative approach.

...and yet if this is indeed the intent, why obfuscate with language like "sold" (which to me, does involve a financial transaction)?

Instead of
"...applies to medical devices that are to be imported or sold for investigational testing..."
why not state instead:
"...applies to medical devices that are to be used for investigational testing..."

It doesn't make any sense to me why you'd throw in "imported" or "sold", if the intent is to ignore the financial element.
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#4
This is where the less common definitions of a word can come into play.

While most people understand "Sell" in terms of a financial transaction, it can also mean "Make available for sale", actual completion of a transaction not required.
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#5
Agree. But in this context it still makes no sense - except to cause confusion.

Whether we're talking "sold for investigational testing", or "made available for sale for investigational testing" doesn't really make a difference to my initial inquiry.

We could assume, for the sake of argument, that the device is NOT available for sale, and NOT imported. You are simply lending a prototype of a device that has yet to be marketed to an investigator so that he/she can carry out an investigation.

If the regulations are intended to cover such cases, I don't see any reason why the scope would not have just been worded simply as "...used for investigational testing...". Seems strange, and unnecessarily confusing, to specify importation and sale in the scope...
 

RA Guy

Involved In Discussions
#6
Mark, sorry to reply on a bit of an older thread, but "sell" is defined in the Food and Drug Act:
"sell includes offer for sale, expose for sale, have in possession for sale and distribute, whether or not the distribution is made for consideration;"

In the case of investigational devices this definition contrasts internal R&D testing from handing devices over to 3rd party PIs for use in clinical studies (distribution). An IRB may still be required for internal studies involving human subjects, but Health Canada does not require an ITA to do so. 
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#7
Mark, sorry to reply on a bit of an older thread, but "sell" is defined in the Food and Drug Act:
"sell includes offer for sale, expose for sale, have in possession for sale and distribute, whether or not the distribution is made for consideration;"

In the case of investigational devices this definition contrasts internal R&D testing from handing devices over to 3rd party PIs for use in clinical studies (distribution). An IRB may still be required for internal studies involving human subjects, but Health Canada does not require an ITA to do so. 
Thanks for the reply! ...but I apologize, I'm still struggling for clarity...

On the one hand, you seem to be indicating that just giving/lending an investigational device to a 3rd party for testing purposes IS considered "sale" (because the definition includes "have in possession for sale and distribute"?), but then say Health Canada does NOT require an Investigational Testing Authorization (ITA) in such cases?

...but isn't that what section 89 requires?
"83 (1) The Minister shall issue an authorization referred to in subsection 80(2) to a manufacturer or importer if the Minister determines that..."

I appreciate the F&D Act definition, but I'm still confused as to why the regulations would be written with "sell" if what they actually mean is "distribute", or "use"...
 

RA Guy

Involved In Discussions
#8
Hi Mark:

ITA not required for internal to company clinical studies as a manufacturer does not distribute to themselves. This is the scenario where an ITA is never required, but IRB approval is.

I agree that the use of "sell" is overly broad and as a result often misunderstood. I tend to think of it as any transfer of possession to an external party for the purposes of performing investigational testing on human subjects, even if the transfer is temporary.

Why the word "sell" was landed on to include all of the regulated activities is something I can't tell you.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N Usability testing required for FDA IDE (investigational device exemption)? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 8
M Medical Device News Health Canada update - Applications for Medical Device Investigational Testing Authorizations Canada Medical Device Regulations 0
S ITA (Investigational Testing Authorization) for Clinical Feasibility Study Canada Medical Device Regulations 4
J ITA (Investigational Testing Authorizations) - Labeling requirements Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
A Direct vs. Post-License Investigational Test Authorization (ITA) Canada Medical Device Regulations 0
M FDA Requirements for Investigational Devices - Clinical Investigation & Shipping Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Changing Investigational Device from Non-Sterile to Sterile - what are the implications? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 3
dinakim_zv Preparing for Investigational Device Exemption ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
V Investigational Device Exemption of a listed device: what to do? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 9
M Informational Netherlands – Investigational Medical Device Dossier Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational US FDA – Expanded Access for Medical Devices - Investigational medical devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
R Cleared medical device labeled as investigational US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 8
K UDI Labeling for Clinical Investigational Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 4
R Coexisting Investigational Use and CE-Mark - Adding a new Indication EU Medical Device Regulations 4
J Shipping Investigational-Use Only Devices to New Zealand Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 4
J Investigational Device Exemption approved 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
J Declaration of Conformity for an Investigational product EU Medical Device Regulations 3
shimonv Controls for Investigational Medical Device (a challenging question..) Other US Medical Device Regulations 4
J Import of an Investigational Device from a Contract Manufacturer 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 9
H GMPs (Good Manufacturing Practices) in IND (Investigational New Drug) Study 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
T Selling an Unapproved Investigational Device for Clinical Studies ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D Post-Market Compliance with Investigational AEs 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
D EU Clinical Trial Startup vs. US IDE (Investigational Device Exemption) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
D Transfer Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) to New Sponsor 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
P Continuous Spinal Infusion Investigational Device Exemption 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T Shrinkage Testing for EPDM Material Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 5
J Managing design verification regression testing of design changes Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
D Conductivity Water Samples testing temperature Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
G Pricing Structure for Physical Mechanical Testing of Labs Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
S Skipped/Reduced testing in Pharma for Raw materials and Intermediates Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
S Pharmaceutical Shelf Life Testing Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
D How to testing of Pressure relief valve as per API 6D ? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 1
J Impact Testing--Is conversion between Izod and Sharpy Possible? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
O Should a Covid vaccine and testing policy be included as part of ISO9001 or AS9100 risk management? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
V How to select the tests for proficiency testing Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 0
B Customer Preference Testing Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
N Pre-Clinical Performance Testing Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
I Software (SaMD) mobile application verification testing: objective evidence Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 2
I How to find required testing for a specific device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
J CQI-9v4 Alternative TUS Testing Methods Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 0
M ASTM F1717 Static and Dynamic Testing 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T Mold Limits for Microbiology Testing Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
S Orthopedic implant sterility testing Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
H Independence between the development and testing IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 6
M Issues with leakage current testing for a CLASS II device since no PE and FE is present IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
M Testing criteria - where to place Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
E 60601-1 - Tilt testing - Tensile safety factor IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
V Setup for testing against ISO14708 clause 16 (protection of the patient from herms caused by heat) Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
gramps What do you think about automated QA testing For software app industry? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
B In house NIOSH pre Testing accepted by NIOSH? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom