Anyone see the Guest Column in the May 2016 Quality magazine entitled "IQN900 or ISO 9001? Which is the best quality standard for your company?"
While it was an interesting read, I found it more interesting that a search on IQN900 only generated a few hits. In addition, this "International" norm was written by none other than the author of the guest column. Merits of the article aside, how does one person author a document then proclaim it to be "International" quality norm a.k.a. standard?
Getting past that, as a true international quality group, let's discuss the merits and feasibility of International Quality Norm 900 versus ISO 9001.
While it was an interesting read, I found it more interesting that a search on IQN900 only generated a few hits. In addition, this "International" norm was written by none other than the author of the guest column. Merits of the article aside, how does one person author a document then proclaim it to be "International" quality norm a.k.a. standard?
Getting past that, as a true international quality group, let's discuss the merits and feasibility of International Quality Norm 900 versus ISO 9001.
