Is Cpk calculation of dBA (noise level) valid?

R

raymondsmlui

#1
As the sound noise level dba is a log function, can we calculate the cpk using the traditional method ?
- First, can we add them up and make an average ? Remeber that 1dba+1dba is not equal to 2 dba.
- Secondly, can we calucate the standard deviation ?
- Can we use the formula cpk = ..... ?
I've struggle with this problem for a long time. Hope that someone can help me.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
B

brahmaiah

#2
Re: Is Cpk calculation of DBA (noise level) valid ?

As the sound noise level dba is a log function, can we calculate the cpk using the traditional method ?
- First, can we add them up and make an average ? Remeber that 1dba+1dba is not equal to 2 dba.
- Secondly, can we calucate the standard deviation ?
- Can we use the formula cpk = ..... ?
I've struggle with this problem for a long time. Hope that someone can help me.
As common adding method does not apply to sound level measurement. Cpk calculation can not be applied. A run chart can be used to record trends. An histogram for db observed can also be misleading.

V.J.Brahmaiah
 

Kales Veggie

People: The Vital Few
#3
As the sound noise level dba is a log function, can we calculate the cpk using the traditional method ?
- First, can we add them up and make an average ? Remeber that 1dba+1dba is not equal to 2 dba.
- Secondly, can we calucate the standard deviation ?
- Can we use the formula cpk = ..... ?
I've struggle with this problem for a long time. Hope that someone can help me.
Since Db(a) is a relative measurement, can you determine (or calculate) the power (in mW) and use that for a capability calculation? (removing the log)
 

Tim Folkerts

Super Moderator
#5
I would not be so quick to change from dB to mW.

There is a reason that A log scale is used for sound levels. Human perception of sound is more closely related to dB than to mW. At least approximately, 50 dB is perceived as "half way" between 40 dB and 60 dB. With a calculation based on power, 57 dB is the "average". (In fact, 57 dB would ALSO be the average of 0 dB and 60 dB! based on power.) If you want to know the spread in sound as perceived by people ,then working with dB would seem to be fine. If you want ot know the actual power levels, then mW may be better.


Or think of it another way. A very common technique in capability analysis is to apply a Box-Cox transformation to data. In a sense, using a dB scale is like applying a Box-Cox transformation to the data. Without seeing the data is is hard to know if that transformation will make the data closer to normal or not.

Tim
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
Or think of it another way. A very common technique in capability analysis is to apply a Box-Cox transformation to data. In a sense, using a dB scale is like applying a Box-Cox transformation to the data. Without seeing the data is is hard to know if that transformation will make the data closer to normal or not.

Tim
gently posing an alternative view: - just because it's common, doesn't mean you should. This is one area where I certainly disagree with current commonly held statistical practices; I'm a bit old school. my heroes are Tukey, Ott, Seder, et al. Everyone should read Wheeler's article* in the August issue of Quality Digest: "Do you have Leptokurtophobia?" bobdoerring posted the link yesterday...

my answer to the OP's question would be slightly different: he is absolutely correct that a standard calculation of Cpk with dB data would be mathematically incorrect. Because the data isn't Normally distributed AND it's a log scale...HOWEVER, one can assess still assess capability either by determining the proportion of out of tolerance values and working thru the Z table "backwards" [Cpk = Z/3; Z = Normsinv(p)], alternatively you can simply calculate the ratio of the spread of the process to the spread of the tolerance...it depends on what the Cpk value will be used for. Is it defect rate or variation that you are concerned with?

There is no magical correctness to the standard way of calculating Cpk; even with a Normal distribution, the answer is still a point estimate. Processes are rarely static and even slight variations form homogeneity or Normality will yield fairly large differences in the estimate. The intent is to understand capability; It is not to hit some magical value. Towards that end the run chart plotted against the spec limits is the best first start - it will tell you the most with the least amount of mathematical worries.

If you post your data we can help further...

*"When you transform the data to achieve statistical properties you deceive both yourself and everyone else who is not sophisticated enough to catch you in your deception. When you check your data for normality prior to placing them on a process behavior chart you are practicing statistical voodoo. Transforming the data prior to using them on a process behavior chart is not only bad advice, it is also an outright mistake." Donald Wheeler, Do you have Leptokurtophobia?, Quality Digest, August 2009
 
R

raymondsmlui

#8
Re: Is Cpk calculation of DBA (noise level) valid ?

This is one of the fundamental source of the problem.
What indicator should be used to reflect the ability of the products meeting the specification ? Cpk should be considered as this is a well known indication, but it seems the calculation should be modified.
If we just focus on the center-tendency, it seems medium is better than the average.
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
what are the two columns? did you measure the dB level of each event twice or is each value from a unique event? wha ti sthe event that you are measuring?
 
R

raymondsmlui

#10
Hi Rev D

The original data measurement is noise level of 2 different rotation directions. I've pool the data for the capability calculation.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
K Analysis variation among the lots during cpk calculation. Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
U Cpk Calculation - I analyse a double seam cans Manufacturing and Related Processes 15
E Questions regarding Cpk Calculation - Should we be using LSL/USL or LCL/UCL? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 5
J Calculation of σ within subgroups for Cpk in Minitab Using Minitab Software 1
J Calculation of the Mean - Student Question about Cpk calculation Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
K In Process Data Collection and Cpk Calculation Manufacturing and Related Processes 13
M Calculating Cp and Cpk - Is my calculation correct? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 7
K Problem with Cpk calculation of dimension with nominal at the top limit. Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
E Asymmetric Tolerance - How does an Asymmetric Tolerance affect the Cpk/Cp calculation Using Minitab Software 3
B Why 3 sigma in Cpk calculation? Six Sigma 8
T Cp and Cpk calculation for Non-normal data? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
J Methods used to calculate Cpk value - Need help for Cpk Calculation Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
A Is the normal Cpk calculation applicable for data with positive & negative values? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
G Cpk Calculation - Tolerance to maintain 1.33 & 1.67 Cpk respectively Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 17
M Calculation of Cpk and Ppk for an unstable process Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 7
J Calculation/math to find 1.33 Cpk Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 15
O Customer is telling me my Cpk calculation is incorrect Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 13
C Software Calculation Errors for Cp and Cpk With Unilateral Tolerances Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
R Cp, Cpk calculation for np chart - No USL or LSL - SMT Production Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 16
R Cpk calculation for short runs - Manufacturing FFC (flexible flat cable) Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 3
T Short Run - Low Volume Cpk Calculation Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 10
D Increased positional tol. due to departure from MMC (Bonus)and calculation of Ppk/Cpk Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 9
W LTPD, AQL, Ppk and Cpk validation sampling plan table Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
M Cp and Cpk for straightness and parallelism Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 8
Q Capability - CPk comparison values Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 12
D Tolerance definition based on expected Cp/cpk Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 14
S Recommendation for user friendly Gaga R&R and Cpk software Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10
A How to set up Continuous CpK monitoring of an injection mold process Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 7
A Interpretation with regards to Ppk > Cpk Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 14
Proud Liberal Cp / Cpk on position using multiple MMC bonuses Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
I Can we use pin gauges to measure an accurate Cpk ? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 9
T Final process capability results - What I am supposed to present? Cp and CpK? APQP and PPAP 11
F CpK on a manufactured assembly? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 7
M How is the Cmk and Cpk calculated? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 0
O Cpk for Unilateral Tolerance Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 9
B How to calculate CPK with n = 1 Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
O CPK with a P value less than 0.005 Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
A Short Term vs. Long Term SPC Study - Where is Cp and Cpk Defined Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
A Cpk Formula seems off, need help!? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 11
D Cp/Cpk on Gages for MSA (vs. Cg/Cgk) Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 21
B Maximum Material Condition with Bonus - Determine Cpk for this one kpc Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 2
Hami812 Cpk Setting Tolerance - Cart before the Horse? (Wifi Routers) Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 3
T Calculating LCL, UCL, Cp, and Cpk in an Excel Spreadsheet Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
Proud Liberal Cpk on Position w/ MMC on Location and Size Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 3
E SPC Production - Getting Cpk and Ppk Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
S Track Cpk trend Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
M Cp & Cpk about a diameter measured with min.,max. and average values. Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 13
P Non-normal Data Cpk Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
alonFAI Cpk for Solder Paste Height Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
I As a part of validation, should i include the acceptance criteria of CPk index >1.33? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom