Is explicit revision control needed if handled automatically by software?

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#1
If an electronic documentation system automatically handles certain "cascades" of document changes, is explicit approvals/revision-levels required for the documents that are automatically updated?

For example bill-of-materials (BOM) and device master records (DMR) are created automatically based on current revision of other controlled documents (they are essentially just indices which tabulate part-info/documents from the meta-data of other files).

So, in practice, if a part-drawing is updated, the BOM and DMR are automatically updated by the document management software. In this case it seems unncessary to have to explicitly document revisions and approvals of the new BOM and DMR...

Thoughts?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

normzone

Trusted Information Resource
#2
Do it however works for you - it sounds like what you're doing actually does constitute " revisions and approvals ".

But bear this in mind - I speak from experience.

The first time the system glitches and you're unable to detect at exactly what point the glitch began, you'll wish you had a more thorough control system.
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#3
:lol: Thanks normzone. Knowing how volatile all-encompassing electronic systems can be, I frequently export and backup PDFs as "snapshots" of the files at a given point in time...
These are exclusively backup and are not available to others (so there is no mixup). The "official" versions of BOM and DMR are accessed purely electronically and are generated in real-time by the software...

...it sounds like what you're doing actually does constitute " revisions and approvals ".
That's the thing: using a system like this, neither the BOM nor the DMR actually have a revision or explicit approvals, as they are generated by the software on demand...

Anyway, seems to be working well. I was just concerned that generating documents in real-time by the software may be questioned by quality-system auditors...
 
M

MIREGMGR

#4
Does everyone that has the ability to modify any controlled element, have full authority on their own to change that element? Or is there some sort of implied change approval or authority assignment external to the change control system?

How does your quality system handle matters that require more than one approval before implementation?

You use the term "DMR", implying US FDA compliance is an issue. I doubt if a system such as you describe could be made to satisfy an inspector in regard to 21CFR 820.30 Design Control unless there's more to it, because of the expectation of multiple approvals for certain design commitments, which implies multiple approvals for controlled changes subsequent to those commitments.

It's common in my experience for a medical device controlled-change pre-approval process for a significant change (as opposed to a defined-non-significant change or document correction) to require six or eight signatures.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
Sounds like a potential risk to me. What if a drawing (or whatever) is updated and approved but not intended to be incorporated into an assembly until a later time? Will the software automatically generate the BOM and DMR based on this?

Do you at least somehow snapshot the BOM and DMR after they are produced? Otherwise, how do you know what the configuration of a particular lot was built against? I presume there's more to the story but those thoughts jumped out.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#6
how do you know what the configuration of a particular lot was built against?
Yes, crucial point. My understanding is that a system that doesn't maintain a history of all its revision levels, with effectivity dates for each approved change and an ability to tie each production batch to the DMR status under which they were manufactured...in other words, a DHF and DHR...cannot satisfy 21CFR 820.

Or do you intend to do those functions and the change approvals process offline using paper?
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#7
Thanks for all replies. Good discussion.

Perhaps an example would help illustrate:

1. A draft of a new part drawing is issued by engineering (in response to a change-request)

2. Any verification and/or validation required for the change are carried out and documented in the change record. Following these activities, the new part drawing is formally approved by all necessary parties via a paper-based sign-off.

3. Once approved, the new drawing made effective by uploading to the electronic system. The electronic version is read-only (except to system admin, who is responsible for uploading approved revisions).

4. Now, if you were to re-load the pages for the DMR or BOM, they'd be automatically updated with the details of the revised drawing.

5. In terms of Device History Records, when a batch is started, the DMR and BOM are brought up and printed, and these printed copied are maintained with paper-based DHRs. ...this way it is certain what the "snap-shot" of the DMR and BOM was for any given production batch.

So, despite the fact that neither the DMR or BOM have an explicit revision, change-history or approvals (except for approval of the initial template):
- It is clear what the state of the two are for each production batch.
- The electronic versions are always up-to-date, as they index other document data in real-time.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Risk Requirements to meet the explicit Risk Based Approach of ISO 13485:2016 Examples ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 21
A Are Explicit Quality Objectives Required? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 8
N New Certificate for ISO 13485 & CMDCAS has no product listed nor explicit CMDCAS refs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
L Does a backdate form format can be changed if wrong revision is used? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
B New Release of CQI-12 Coatings Process (Revision 3- Release date- 7/2020) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
M Gap analysis on ISO 14971:2019 with previous revision ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
M Is There a Revision History or Change Log for Canadian Regulations? Canada Medical Device Regulations 3
C SOP unification. Revision No, Revision history Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
I Dating controlled documents after changes - Revision History Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 13
I Revision History Date - date of updates or date of release? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
J ISO 14001 revision process ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
B CQI-11 (Plating Audit) - New revision updates IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
P Proposed revision of IEC 62304 - 2019 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 6
I Tracking Protoype Changes; 8D or simple document revision? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
A The latest revision number and changes in automotive core tools IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
L Getting Notice of Revision and Accessing Public Draft Copies of ISO Standards Service Industry Specific Topics 2
A Domain of the component (EASA CM No.: CM-SWCEH-001 Issue 01 Revision 02) Point 9.3.3 (Usage domain aspects) EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 0
M Informational ISO 14971 / ISO TR 24971 revision update – atualizações sobre a revisão Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Document Control - Revision Number in Document Names Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
L VDA 1 Documented Information and Retention (new revision 4, August 2018) VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 0
M Informational ISO TC 210 JWG 1 meeting in São Paulo – Revision of ISO 14971 and ISO TR 24971 – Medical Device Risk Management Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Revision of a Form which is a Procedure Attachment Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
S IMS Manual Review and Revision Prior to Audit ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 4
2 First Article Requirements for Revision Changes of Engineering AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
ScottK Question for Auditors on 7.1.4 in the ISO9001:2015 revision ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
C Document Control - old revision vs new revision Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 22
R Clinical evaluation Meddev (2.7.1 revision 4) - Example or Template EU Medical Device Regulations 4
Paul Simpson Informational The role of Annex SL - High Level Structure of ISO MSS's - Revision Update February 2019 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 26
T ISO 9004:2018 Revision - Released April 2018 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
Brizilla Knowledge of the upcoming ISO 17025 Revision ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
Q Change revision number in document when only codification was changed Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
Sam Lazzara Preferred Location for Revision History Section in Documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 16
Marc When will Revision 5 of the AIAG FMEA Manual be released? FMEA and Control Plans 93
S Pre-release version of the upcoming AIAG FMEA Revision 5 FMEA and Control Plans 1
J Is there a specification that provides directions on Drawing Revision Changes Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
L Supplier Revision Confirmation of Received Engineering Documents ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
M ISO 14971 and ISO TR 24971 revision ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 32
Q AS9100 Re-certification Audit - Which Revision? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
M Proposed System: Revision = Modification Date; Approval = Access Permissions Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
Q Objective and Goals - ISO 9001:2008 Frequency Revision Requirements ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
M ISO 14971:2007 Revision Approved - The Delft ISO TC 210 plenary meeting - Nov 2016 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
N Transition Audits - AS9100 Revision D AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 26
P Is the next revision of ISO 15378 following the High Level Structure? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 5
M Future of ISO 14971 - Possible revision? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 9
L The ink is dry(ing) on the revision of ISO 14001:2015. “Is the payoff worth the price Imported Legacy Blogs 0
A Post-market Clinical Studies of Orthopaedic (Revision) Implants EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Where does Document Revision Control Start? Rev 0 or Rev 1 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 19
I Document Control - Document Revision History Question Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 16
T Is there a requirement in TS16949 that PO's show a revision level? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
O Regulatory Notification for IVD IFU Instructions Revision ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom