The answer is: It depends. Is the heat treatment done solely for hardening the part? Is the hardening of the metal localized to a specific area of the part? Can you effectively measure the hardness of the area without inducing unacceptable denting onto the part?
If you can answer these 3 questions as "yes", then, this is not a process that needs to be validated since you can effectively "inspect" the characteristics at the end of the process, against the requirements.
If you can answer these 3 questions as "yes", then, this is not a process that needs to be validated since you can effectively "inspect" the characteristics at the end of the process, against the requirements.

Hi all! I know I'm late into the discussion. One always hates Old Sayings. But that does not take away from their legitimacy.
Whether heat treat is a special process will depend on several factors including the type of material, the ability to run post checks, redundant checks, etc.
If you are solution heat treating aluminum, it's probably too late to find out there was a temperature problem when a part gives way under stress 10,000 feet in the air.
However, (thanks NADCAP) a Chem Mill process was having to do uniformity surveys, which the owners were strongly objecting. They know their process, and they can tell by the condition of the skin when it comes out if there is a hot spot/ cold spot. Now... would uniformity surveys be helpful? Yes. Did it require validation? No. They could justify the acceptance of the product (depth/deviation of etching) from the final product, and did not need the uniformity survey.
You are heat treating to do something to the product/surface. If the acceptable results of that something can be verified through inspection/testing or some other means, that the validation of the process is optional. If it cannot be conclusively tested, then validation is in the forecast.

Last edited:
