J
Oh No?????Now I'm so confused?????
Well I sat down here on a Saturday morning, Cup-o-Joe by my side and decide to catch up a bit on the Cove.
Next thing I know its 45 minutes later coffee's cold, posts are hot, and I don't know which end is up.
Ah well such is life.
Seriously though,
So many good posts and points. I fear though that our depth of experience may be undermining some fundimental thruths about our tasks.
1) To improve quality we need everyones attention and respect.
2) This won't happen without top Management commitment.
3) Top management won't commit without a: Solid bottom line improvement potential, or b: some kind of customer requirement.
4) ISO (through customer requirements) provides the tool to force top management to look at quality/business systems from a different (non-fiscal) angle.
I wonder if many here have been dealing with ISO/QMS/TQM etc for so long that they have forgotten what it was like in the early days. The days when Quality meant Inspection, Sampling Plans, and sorting, with maybe a few statistics thrown in.
I am dealing with a company of 85 souls, and a very hands on but non-dictatorial owner. This company has many good things going for it. Discipline is not one of them. Our system is not designed, it has evolved. Now we are seeking registration due to a customer requirement.
The most amazing thing to me is the learning that is taking place. Yes it is an expense - Yes it takes time - Yes it would be nice if we didn't need all of this "evidence". But we are learning! And we are improving! People who I thought would be tough to sell are turning into star pupils, while others who were all for it in the beginning are dragging their feet now that they have to actually do something with it.
All of this painful corporate growth is taking place because one customer has FORCED us to gain certification.
Maybe ISO is cresting -- Maybe the system IS all screwed up -- but as others have mentioned here, where is the alternative. My hope is that we can stay the course, and expand on the strengths of the system, and get more quality courses into the schools etc. ......... until our "business systems thinking" no longer need such requirements.
............And now back to our regularly scheduled Saturday..............(and my flowcharts)
James
:truce:
Well I sat down here on a Saturday morning, Cup-o-Joe by my side and decide to catch up a bit on the Cove.
Next thing I know its 45 minutes later coffee's cold, posts are hot, and I don't know which end is up.
Ah well such is life.
Seriously though,
So many good posts and points. I fear though that our depth of experience may be undermining some fundimental thruths about our tasks.
1) To improve quality we need everyones attention and respect.
2) This won't happen without top Management commitment.
3) Top management won't commit without a: Solid bottom line improvement potential, or b: some kind of customer requirement.
4) ISO (through customer requirements) provides the tool to force top management to look at quality/business systems from a different (non-fiscal) angle.
I wonder if many here have been dealing with ISO/QMS/TQM etc for so long that they have forgotten what it was like in the early days. The days when Quality meant Inspection, Sampling Plans, and sorting, with maybe a few statistics thrown in.
I am dealing with a company of 85 souls, and a very hands on but non-dictatorial owner. This company has many good things going for it. Discipline is not one of them. Our system is not designed, it has evolved. Now we are seeking registration due to a customer requirement.
The most amazing thing to me is the learning that is taking place. Yes it is an expense - Yes it takes time - Yes it would be nice if we didn't need all of this "evidence". But we are learning! And we are improving! People who I thought would be tough to sell are turning into star pupils, while others who were all for it in the beginning are dragging their feet now that they have to actually do something with it.
All of this painful corporate growth is taking place because one customer has FORCED us to gain certification.
Maybe ISO is cresting -- Maybe the system IS all screwed up -- but as others have mentioned here, where is the alternative. My hope is that we can stay the course, and expand on the strengths of the system, and get more quality courses into the schools etc. ......... until our "business systems thinking" no longer need such requirements.
............And now back to our regularly scheduled Saturday..............(and my flowcharts)
James
:truce:
The deal with a new company president fell through, tainted goods-another story, so our CEO now is physically manning the helm. My ex-boss was the GM and he has made a lateral move to another business unit. (Still in the same building). As part of the new emphasis on ISO, I have to speak to all the VP's and other mucky mucks on Monday, Department Heads on Tuesday, Sales on Wednesday, etc.."You now report directly to me", he told me Friday.

