FWIW:
I am aware of "cooperative" efforts by groups of small manufacturers to present a larger image to global purchasers. Whereas Walmart, for example, might not be willing to deal with a small supplier who could only supply 100,000 units of a product, Walmart "might" be willing to deal with a "cooperative" of ten small suppliers which could each supply 100,000 units for a total of the one million Walmart requires.
Such a cooperative might consolidate all of the production inventory in one site where it might be packaged, labeled, and any special logos applied (private branding anyone?) to the product AFTER manufacture.
In theory, it is a WIN-WIN proposition: Walmart gets the quantity it wants and has ten chances to get "some" product; if any one of the ten suffers a force majeure event, Walmart still gets most of what it bargained for.
The members of the cooperative get business they would not have been able to pursue and, hopefully, none of the ten would have been totally reliant on Walmart [unlike with Sears in past days] to refrain from making them captive suppliers and beating them down with threats to put them out of business if they didn't accept little or no profit.
If such a cooperative built Jim's box, it is likely the logo label was applied post-production, maybe even by an independent supplier hired by Lowe's to add a Lowe's house logo to the generic boxes. (I'm aware Lowe's has the Kobalt tool line to compete directly with brands of rival retailers, including Home Depot's Husky brand and Sears' Craftsman - Taskforce is another Lowe's house brand, which is distributed by LG Sourcing, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Lowes. Perhaps LG Sourcing, Inc would supply a direct answer of WHO put on the crooked LOGO tag.)
My purpose in this post is to demonstrate a mini root cause investigation process, NOT a definitive answer as to the root cause.