O
onpoint
Hello Forum,
My company just received a non-conformance related to a failure to meet our Quality Objective for Company-Wide Training, which is currently set at >90%.
My data shows that in general Operations, Engineering and Quality are spot on. So I have no worries as it relates to product, etc. The areas that are consistently bring down the overall average is the Sales and Administrative Teams (Finance / HR), who don't typically interface with the Quality System.
I understand that per the regulation employees must be trained prior to performing a specific task, so I am not looking for what the regulatory requirements is. What I need, is feedback from the forum on what others are doing around establishing a Company-Wide Training Objective, Why, and if 90% is maybe an unrealistic goal.
Your insight is appreciated.
Mary
My company just received a non-conformance related to a failure to meet our Quality Objective for Company-Wide Training, which is currently set at >90%.
My data shows that in general Operations, Engineering and Quality are spot on. So I have no worries as it relates to product, etc. The areas that are consistently bring down the overall average is the Sales and Administrative Teams (Finance / HR), who don't typically interface with the Quality System.
I understand that per the regulation employees must be trained prior to performing a specific task, so I am not looking for what the regulatory requirements is. What I need, is feedback from the forum on what others are doing around establishing a Company-Wide Training Objective, Why, and if 90% is maybe an unrealistic goal.
Your insight is appreciated.
Mary
Last edited by a moderator: