Hello All:
Thank you for the kind words regaring our new baby girl.
I contact Joe Bransky, IATF Delegation Leader. He provided me with a copy of the resolution to postpone the review of TS 16949. I thought the resolution contained text regaridng the justificaiton for the postponement. It really does not. Here is the ballot:
TMB resolution 45/2004
TS 16949 Application of ISO 9001 in the automotive sector
The Technical Management Board,
approves the request from the International Automotive Task Force (IATF) to extend the validity of TS 16949 Quality management systems -- Particular requirements for the application of ISO 9001:2000 for automotive production and relevant service part organizations to 2008 or the next revision of ISO 9001 Quality management systems -- Requirements plus one year.
Also, here is some information from Joe:
The TMB originally authorized TS 16949 and related pilot study. TC 176 was commissioned by the TMB to have oversight of the TS 16949 pilot study. TS 16949:1999 was released in March 1999 based on ISO 9000:1994.
After revision based on ISO 9001:2000, and balloting, TS 16949:2002 was released in March 2002. Based on this revision of TS 16949 and to assure stability in the use of TS 16949 in the automotive supply base, in June 2004, the TMB agreed to extend TS 16949:2002 to 2008 or one year beyond any revisions of ISO 9001:2000 whichever is longer.
(TMB = Technical Management Board)
I wonder if we are assuming a relationship between providing classes and the docuement itself. In the TC 176, we are told to not make decision on the auditability of the document. We are to write and review documents based on the ease of us for the user. We are to keep the world of conformity assessment seperate from the standards. ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, is a group in support of standardization and not necessarily conformity assessment.
By the way, anyone can be an insider, at least in the US. We are volunteers on the US TAG and all meetings are public. One would think I would have learned all of the TC 176 processes since becoming a member in 1999, but I have not. There is so much to do in terms of document review, that I have not been able to learn all of the behind the scenes stuff. I find the US TAG meetings and volunteers so very interesting. Very intelligent people. I always learn a lot at the meetings.
I sent another meessage to Joe and asked point blank, "Are there any plans to obsolete TS 16949. If I learn anything, I will let you know.
Finally, I will continue to searfch for info on the processes for technical specifications, obsoleting, review cycles, etc.
Back to feeding and diapers....
Sincerely, Dirk van Putten