ISO 12100:2010 - Machine Safety Requirements

T

TommmD

#1
As a mechanical engineer, I'm trying to find the physical safety section that applies to a lab installed piece of equipment. 60601 states it is specifically directed towards home health care, where I previously had thought it applied as a general safety guide for all med devices.
We are now looking at the machine safety directive as a guide to evaluating physical safety for moving parts. This is an expansive document with no med device sections, so I'm not all clear as to whether I'm headed in the right direction.

Ideally I'm looking for direction for pinch points and guarding from mechanical motion and would appreciate the help.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
T

TommmD

#2
Machine Safety Directive is part of the assessment for ISO12100:2010 as I understand it.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#3
Which clause in 60601 made you conclude that it only applies to home health care?

1.1 * Scope
This International Standard applies to the BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIAL PERFORMANCE of MEDICAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT and MEDICAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, hereafter referred to as ME EQUIPMENT and ME SYSTEMS.
If the equipment is placed in a lab in the EU, the Machinery directive applies too (provided that we are indeed discussing a piece of machinery).
 
T

TommmD

#4
hmmm ... Going back, I think I was looking at 60601-1-11, which is where I got the 'home health care' from.

I was shown a section from 61010-1 that addresses mechanical safety, so I think thats where we're going to start. We'll use the RHA to flesh out whether hazards actually exist that require use of the Machine Safety Directive.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#5
hmmm ... Going back, I think I was looking at 60601-1-11, which is where I got the 'home health care' from.

I was shown a section from 61010-1 that addresses mechanical safety, so I think thats where we're going to start. We'll use the RHA to flesh out whether hazards actually exist that require use of the Machine Safety Directive.
After my previous posting, IEC 61010 did come to my mind... however, I think you might be looking at this from the wrong end. Is your primary goal regulatory compliance? If so, what is the relevant jurisdiction? Is it the EU? Or are you looking to apply published standards merely to guide you, voluntarily?

BTW, I’m not sure what you refer to by “the Machinery Safety Directive”. I was referring to the EU’s 2006/42/EC directive on machinery, nicknamed commonly “the Machinery Directive”.

Following is the scope statement from IEC 61010-1:2010. Lab equipment is indeed within the scope, unless the equipment also falls under IEC 60601 (and a bunch of other conditions...):

[emphasis not in the original]

1.1 Scope
1.1.1 Equipment included in scope
This part of IEC 61010 specifies general safety requirements for the following types of electrical equipment and their accessories, wherever they are intended to be used.
a) Electrical test and measurement equipment
This is equipment which by electromagnetic means tests, measures, indicates or records one or more electrical or physical quantities, also non-measuring equipment such as signal generators, measurement standards, power supplies for laboratory use, transducers, transmitters, etc. NOTE 1 This includes bench-top power supplies intended to aid a testing or measuring operation on another piece of equipment. Power supplies intended to power equipment are within the scope of IEC 61558 (see 1.1.2 h)).
This standard also applies to test equipment integrated into manufacturing processes and intended for testing manufactured devices. NOTE 2 Manufacturing test equipment is likely to be installed adjacent to and interconnected with industrial machinery in this application.
b) Electrical industrial process-control equipment
This is equipment which controls one or more output quantities to specific values, with each value determined by manual setting, by local or remote programming, or by one or more input variables.
c) Electrical laboratory equipment
This is equipment which measures, indicates, monitors, inspects or analyses materials, or is used to prepare materials, and includes in vitro diagnostic (IVD) equipment.
This equipment may also be used in areas other than laboratories; examples include self-test IVD equipment to be used in the home and inspection equipment to be used to check people or material during transportation.
1.1.2 Equipment excluded from scope
This standard does not apply to equipment within the scope of:
a) IEC 60065 (Audio, video and similar electronic apparatus);
b) IEC 60204 (Safety of machinery – Electrical equipment of machines);
c) IEC 60335 (Household and similar electrical appliances);
d) IEC 60364 (Electrical installations of buildings);
e) IEC 60439 (Low-voltage switchgear and controlgear assemblies);
f) IEC 60601 (Medical electrical equipment);
g) IEC 60950 (Information technology equipment including electrical business equipment, except as specified in 1.1.3);
h) IEC 61558 (Power transformers, power supply units and similar);
i) IEC 61010-031 (Hand-held probe assemblies);
j) IEC 61243-3 (Live working – Voltage detectors – Part 3: Two-pole low-voltage type).
1.1.3 Computing equipment
This standard applies only to computers, processors, etc. which form part of equipment within the scope of this standard or are designed for use exclusively with the equipment.
NOTE Computing devices and similar equipment within the scope of IEC 60950 and conforming to its requirements are considered to be suitable for use with equipment within the scope of this standard. However, some of the requirements of IEC 60950for resistance to moisture and liquids are less stringent than those in this standard (see 5.4.4 second paragraph)).
1.1.4DV Addition of the following referencing the National Electrical Code and the Canadian Electrical Code:
This standard applies to equipment:
a) To be employed in accordance with ANSI/NFPA 70, National Electrical Code® (NEC);
b) Designed to comply with the general requirements of CAN/CSA C22.2 No. 0 and to be installed in accordance with the Canadian Electrical Code (CEC), Part I, CSA C22.1; or
c) Both (a) and (b).
 
T

TommmD

#6
Thx for including the scope. i'm sure I ad libbed 'Safety' since thats whats on my mind. I don't have the Declaration here. Mechanical safety for IVD lab equipment in the EU is precisely what we're addressing. The difference in scope between 60601 & 61010-1 is where I'm getting twisted up. We're being directed to provide the test results & the NRTL we're using is pretty much saying 'we'll test what you want'.

Historically we have not used a CB scheme, & I'm wondering if that would offer a more comprehensive (+$) review from the NRTL.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#7
I'm trying to find the physical safety section that applies to a lab installed piece of equipment.
Mechanical safety for IVD lab equipment in the EU is precisely what we're addressing.
OK, so we’ve established that the jurisdiction is EU. Obviously some regulation applies, but let’s take it one step back so that I can better direct you.

Are you concerned with a single installation, already up and running, or are you dealing with ongoing/future sales/installations (“placing on the EU market”) of a type of IVD lab equipment? Where do your concerns originate from? Have you been approached by the EU authorities (which)? By a past / existing / furture customer? By another section/function inside you org? Other?

I can guide you with regards to EU regulations (and associated published standards) but I’m not an expert on NRTL / CB scheme. Hopefully others will chime in soon.
 
T

TommmD

#8
Well, w/o particulars, we were notified by an EU customer about concerns on an existing installation re mechanical safety, far from the first install,
& are reconstructing the original process for certification. Equipment is from an acquisition that is now several years old. We believe we have the basis for defending the original decisions, but are being cautious. Sorry for being a little vague, but I'm sure you understand the need to be a little circumspect.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#9
Well, w/o particulars, we were notified by an EU customer about concerns on an existing installation re mechanical safety, far from the first install,
& are reconstructing the original process for certification. Equipment is from an acquisition that is now several years old. We believe we have the basis for defending the original decisions, but are being cautious. Sorry for being a little vague, but I'm sure you understand the need to be a little circumspect.
Look, as far as I’m concerned you can be as vague as you like... it’s just that my ability to help decreases exponentially with your vagueness... I’m not interested in names or any other such particulars and I haven’t asked you to disclose anything about any problems or decisions made in the past regarding the product. If it can make things simpler for you, you’re welcome to send me a PM with relevant clarifications. FWIW.

Further, your brevity of “speech” doesn’t serve your cause well. If you could please try to make your sentences less ambiguous (I suppose you’re not doing it on purpose), I might be able to actually understand the situation much quicker.

Now, to the point -

Were the “concerns” you were notified about the cusomer’s own, or were they picked by some EU authority? Were any claims made that the product / installation was not in line with some official safety requirements (or regulation), or was it a “common sense” judgement, that there might be a safety issue? “far from the first install” - does that mean that the specific piece of equipment has been installed / in use for a long time now, or that your org has been selling / installing that model for a long time? “Equipment is from an acquisition that is now several years old” - do you mean the units being sold / installed, or a production line that is yielding new units now? Something else?

“reconstructing the original process for certification”
“have the basis for defending the original decisions”
In terms of EU regulations, what was the original clearance route?
 
Last edited:
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M ISO 14971 Determination of Competent Persons ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
R Clinical accuracy and repeatability of IR(infrared) thermometer, no maximum error criteria is recommended in ISO Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
Q The scope of ISO 21534 Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
A What must be recorded? (ISO 9001:2015, subclause 10.2) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
M ISO 14971:2019: Criteria for overall residual risk ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
B Updated IATF 16949 - Will IATF 16949 get revised when ISO 9001:202X is released? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
S ISO 9001:2015 vs 21 CFR Part 211 matrix Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
N Quality Compliance Officer - ISO 13485, London Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
T ISO 17025: Lockout/Tagout Requirement ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
N ISO 9001 implementation in a Gold exporting business ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
M Does the ISO 9001:2015 standard require a disaster recovery plan or emergency response plan ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
E ISO 13485 QMS certification as a Supplier ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
A Environmental Compliance obligations and risks (ISO 14001:2015 6.1.3) ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
R ISO 17025 vertical audit checklist wanted Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
A Tips and Tricks to understand ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
M ISO 9001 Major Nonconformance Internal Audit Schedule/COVID-19 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
T ISO 13485:2016 Clauses related to process matrix ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
K ISO 50001 Consultant wanted Paid Consulting, Training and Services 0
K Comparison wanted: ISO 15378:2018 vs. PS9000:2016 Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
B ISO 9001 - "Remote Audit Fee" Registrars and Notified Bodies 13
R Risk control measures as per ISO 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 6
John C. Abnet ISO 45001:2018 (5.4 - Consultation and participation of workers) Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Sidney Vianna What ISO Standard (under the TC 176) supports the UN Sustainable Development Goal #10? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 11
S ISO 15223-1:2020 Symbols Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
John C. Abnet ISO 9001 4.4.1 "...shall determine the processes needed..." ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 72
R ISO 10993-18 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
J Can signed agreements over-ride review of every "contract" under ISO 13485:2016? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
R Applicable ISO standards - packaging and others Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
J Implementing an ISO 13485 QMS Software ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Q EN ISO 13485:2016/AC:2018 - AC:2018 being stated in the applicable harmonized standard listing Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
M ISO 10993-17 - Ancillary Medicinal substance leachables Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Medical Devices - Ancillary - ISO 10993-17 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
J Leveraging another company's ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
J New Job Position - Achieving ISO 13485 Certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S ISO 9001 Clause 8.2.3 - Review of the requirements for products and services in a Cafe ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
A ISO 17025 - Methods validation and clients ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
A Scope of ISO 13485 certificate ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
A ASL requirement when the supplier is certified for ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D ISO 9001 certificate issued by QMS International for 10 years - legit? Registrars and Notified Bodies 17
Z Does anyone have experience with EN ISO 17664 ? IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 9
K Medical Device Repairs and ISO Scope ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
K Software Updates in the Field and ISO scope ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
M ISO 13485-2016 online certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Z Auditor Findings ISO 14001:2015 vs. 45001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 5
S Thoughts on managing ISO 9001, 13485, IATF 16949 and 17025 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
S Supplier Management ISO 13485: 2016- Which supplier needs to fill in a self assessment form? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C ISO/IEC 17021-1 clause 7.1.2 - Determination of competence criteria Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
G ISO 17023 2017-11 - Suggestions for good books ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
B Timeframe for updating QMS / transitioning from ISO 14971:2012 to ISO 14971:2019 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 10
M ISO 9001:2015 and AS6081:2012 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom