ISO 12100:2010 - Machine Safety Requirements

T

TommmD

#1
As a mechanical engineer, I'm trying to find the physical safety section that applies to a lab installed piece of equipment. 60601 states it is specifically directed towards home health care, where I previously had thought it applied as a general safety guide for all med devices.
We are now looking at the machine safety directive as a guide to evaluating physical safety for moving parts. This is an expansive document with no med device sections, so I'm not all clear as to whether I'm headed in the right direction.

Ideally I'm looking for direction for pinch points and guarding from mechanical motion and would appreciate the help.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
T

TommmD

#2
Machine Safety Directive is part of the assessment for ISO12100:2010 as I understand it.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Moderator
#3
Which clause in 60601 made you conclude that it only applies to home health care?

1.1 * Scope
This International Standard applies to the BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIAL PERFORMANCE of MEDICAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT and MEDICAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, hereafter referred to as ME EQUIPMENT and ME SYSTEMS.
If the equipment is placed in a lab in the EU, the Machinery directive applies too (provided that we are indeed discussing a piece of machinery).
 
T

TommmD

#4
hmmm ... Going back, I think I was looking at 60601-1-11, which is where I got the 'home health care' from.

I was shown a section from 61010-1 that addresses mechanical safety, so I think thats where we're going to start. We'll use the RHA to flesh out whether hazards actually exist that require use of the Machine Safety Directive.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Moderator
#5
hmmm ... Going back, I think I was looking at 60601-1-11, which is where I got the 'home health care' from.

I was shown a section from 61010-1 that addresses mechanical safety, so I think thats where we're going to start. We'll use the RHA to flesh out whether hazards actually exist that require use of the Machine Safety Directive.
After my previous posting, IEC 61010 did come to my mind... however, I think you might be looking at this from the wrong end. Is your primary goal regulatory compliance? If so, what is the relevant jurisdiction? Is it the EU? Or are you looking to apply published standards merely to guide you, voluntarily?

BTW, I’m not sure what you refer to by “the Machinery Safety Directive”. I was referring to the EU’s 2006/42/EC directive on machinery, nicknamed commonly “the Machinery Directive”.

Following is the scope statement from IEC 61010-1:2010. Lab equipment is indeed within the scope, unless the equipment also falls under IEC 60601 (and a bunch of other conditions...):

[emphasis not in the original]

1.1 Scope
1.1.1 Equipment included in scope
This part of IEC 61010 specifies general safety requirements for the following types of electrical equipment and their accessories, wherever they are intended to be used.
a) Electrical test and measurement equipment
This is equipment which by electromagnetic means tests, measures, indicates or records one or more electrical or physical quantities, also non-measuring equipment such as signal generators, measurement standards, power supplies for laboratory use, transducers, transmitters, etc. NOTE 1 This includes bench-top power supplies intended to aid a testing or measuring operation on another piece of equipment. Power supplies intended to power equipment are within the scope of IEC 61558 (see 1.1.2 h)).
This standard also applies to test equipment integrated into manufacturing processes and intended for testing manufactured devices. NOTE 2 Manufacturing test equipment is likely to be installed adjacent to and interconnected with industrial machinery in this application.
b) Electrical industrial process-control equipment
This is equipment which controls one or more output quantities to specific values, with each value determined by manual setting, by local or remote programming, or by one or more input variables.
c) Electrical laboratory equipment
This is equipment which measures, indicates, monitors, inspects or analyses materials, or is used to prepare materials, and includes in vitro diagnostic (IVD) equipment.
This equipment may also be used in areas other than laboratories; examples include self-test IVD equipment to be used in the home and inspection equipment to be used to check people or material during transportation.
1.1.2 Equipment excluded from scope
This standard does not apply to equipment within the scope of:
a) IEC 60065 (Audio, video and similar electronic apparatus);
b) IEC 60204 (Safety of machinery – Electrical equipment of machines);
c) IEC 60335 (Household and similar electrical appliances);
d) IEC 60364 (Electrical installations of buildings);
e) IEC 60439 (Low-voltage switchgear and controlgear assemblies);
f) IEC 60601 (Medical electrical equipment);
g) IEC 60950 (Information technology equipment including electrical business equipment, except as specified in 1.1.3);
h) IEC 61558 (Power transformers, power supply units and similar);
i) IEC 61010-031 (Hand-held probe assemblies);
j) IEC 61243-3 (Live working – Voltage detectors – Part 3: Two-pole low-voltage type).
1.1.3 Computing equipment
This standard applies only to computers, processors, etc. which form part of equipment within the scope of this standard or are designed for use exclusively with the equipment.
NOTE Computing devices and similar equipment within the scope of IEC 60950 and conforming to its requirements are considered to be suitable for use with equipment within the scope of this standard. However, some of the requirements of IEC 60950for resistance to moisture and liquids are less stringent than those in this standard (see 5.4.4 second paragraph)).
1.1.4DV Addition of the following referencing the National Electrical Code and the Canadian Electrical Code:
This standard applies to equipment:
a) To be employed in accordance with ANSI/NFPA 70, National Electrical Code® (NEC);
b) Designed to comply with the general requirements of CAN/CSA C22.2 No. 0 and to be installed in accordance with the Canadian Electrical Code (CEC), Part I, CSA C22.1; or
c) Both (a) and (b).
 
T

TommmD

#6
Thx for including the scope. i'm sure I ad libbed 'Safety' since thats whats on my mind. I don't have the Declaration here. Mechanical safety for IVD lab equipment in the EU is precisely what we're addressing. The difference in scope between 60601 & 61010-1 is where I'm getting twisted up. We're being directed to provide the test results & the NRTL we're using is pretty much saying 'we'll test what you want'.

Historically we have not used a CB scheme, & I'm wondering if that would offer a more comprehensive (+$) review from the NRTL.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Moderator
#7
I'm trying to find the physical safety section that applies to a lab installed piece of equipment.
Mechanical safety for IVD lab equipment in the EU is precisely what we're addressing.
OK, so we’ve established that the jurisdiction is EU. Obviously some regulation applies, but let’s take it one step back so that I can better direct you.

Are you concerned with a single installation, already up and running, or are you dealing with ongoing/future sales/installations (“placing on the EU market”) of a type of IVD lab equipment? Where do your concerns originate from? Have you been approached by the EU authorities (which)? By a past / existing / furture customer? By another section/function inside you org? Other?

I can guide you with regards to EU regulations (and associated published standards) but I’m not an expert on NRTL / CB scheme. Hopefully others will chime in soon.
 
T

TommmD

#8
Well, w/o particulars, we were notified by an EU customer about concerns on an existing installation re mechanical safety, far from the first install,
& are reconstructing the original process for certification. Equipment is from an acquisition that is now several years old. We believe we have the basis for defending the original decisions, but are being cautious. Sorry for being a little vague, but I'm sure you understand the need to be a little circumspect.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Moderator
#9
Well, w/o particulars, we were notified by an EU customer about concerns on an existing installation re mechanical safety, far from the first install,
& are reconstructing the original process for certification. Equipment is from an acquisition that is now several years old. We believe we have the basis for defending the original decisions, but are being cautious. Sorry for being a little vague, but I'm sure you understand the need to be a little circumspect.
Look, as far as I’m concerned you can be as vague as you like... it’s just that my ability to help decreases exponentially with your vagueness... I’m not interested in names or any other such particulars and I haven’t asked you to disclose anything about any problems or decisions made in the past regarding the product. If it can make things simpler for you, you’re welcome to send me a PM with relevant clarifications. FWIW.

Further, your brevity of “speech” doesn’t serve your cause well. If you could please try to make your sentences less ambiguous (I suppose you’re not doing it on purpose), I might be able to actually understand the situation much quicker.

Now, to the point -

Were the “concerns” you were notified about the cusomer’s own, or were they picked by some EU authority? Were any claims made that the product / installation was not in line with some official safety requirements (or regulation), or was it a “common sense” judgement, that there might be a safety issue? “far from the first install” - does that mean that the specific piece of equipment has been installed / in use for a long time now, or that your org has been selling / installing that model for a long time? “Equipment is from an acquisition that is now several years old” - do you mean the units being sold / installed, or a production line that is yielding new units now? Something else?

“reconstructing the original process for certification”
“have the basis for defending the original decisions”
In terms of EU regulations, what was the original clearance route?
 
Last edited:
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A ISO 80601-2-30 - the rated range of cuff pressure in the IFU Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
V ISO 17025 Accreditation Consulting Needed ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
S ISO 13485 certification training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
B New to ISO 14971. Comparing to MIL-STD-882 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 7
Sidney Vianna Informational ISO Net Zero Guidelines - Free Download Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 4
Sidney Vianna Tesla Lacks Major Automotive Quality Certifications such as IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
D Is Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Required in ISO 17025? ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
Ed Panek ISO 13485 Reporting Requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
Cats Clause ISO 9001 - verification of Tape Measures and Steel rules ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
W Looking for IATF 16949 (and ISO 17025) QMS software Suggestions Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 8
Doninina Risk management file according MDR or ISO 14971:P2019 ? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
B Multisite Certification Requirements for ISO 27001 IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 8
D ISO 27001:2022 Harmonisation Timeline IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
R Process Maps for ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
S ISO 9001 Quality Management System and its processes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
K Becoming a Trainer for ISO/AS Lead Auditor and AATT Courses Professional Certifications and Degrees 2
M Preservation of Raw Materials in ISO 9001:2015 Standard ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
B ISO 13485 Qualification of R&D Equipment Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
J Recognised/reputable courses for ISO 13485 Section 7.3 (Design & Development)? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
S ISO 14001 Operational Planning and Control - Proving evidence of communicating environmental requirements to suppliers ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
L Assignment on the link between Quality Gurus & ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
jeancloude17 Advice for ISO 9001 for software Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
J Properly referencing ISO standards ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 66
Q ISO 13485 certificate needed if I go for MDSAP certification? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Sidney Vianna Informational ISO/TS 10020:2022 Quality management systems — Organizational change management — Processes Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
Ed Panek ISO 9001 Cert Scope Adjustment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
P ISO 9001: Quality Management as a process ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
K ISO 2859-5 (single run production) control plan issues FMEA and Control Plans 2
K ISO 17025 Method Validation and Verification for Test Lab ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
K ISO 13485 Design Requirement with respect to "component" manufacturers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
P Registrar Cancelled ISO 13485 Auditors multiple times? Registrars and Notified Bodies 1
rob3027 ISO 13485 justification for design and development exclusion for medical packaging ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
A Help understanding what it takes to implement a QMS that is ISO 13485 compliant ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
R ISO 17025 Lead Assessor Training ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
H Active Implantable Medical Devices - ISO 14708 and EN 45502 Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
L ISO 10993-18 vs ISO 18562-4 Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 4
J Iso 9001 Clause 7.1 - Advice needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 21
D ISO 14001 Finding - Missing Safety Data Sheets ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
J ISO 17025 Calibration Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
FuzzyD ISO 13485:2016 Customer Assessment OFI ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
K Applicable ISO 9001 clauses for Human Resources? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
C Clinical Trial using Prototype devices (EU MDR & ISO 14155) EU Medical Device Regulations 4
I IEC 60812 or ISO 14971 for PFMEA? What should we use? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
I ISO 9000 Where to Start ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 81
M ISO 13485 consultants and auditors with design oriented focus ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
D ISO 9001:2015 Internal Audit Check Sheet ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
H Does ISO state in anyway that we MUST keep physical first piece parts? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
B ISO cl. 5.3 - Ensuring that the integrity of the QMS is maintained ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
A ISO 9001- any advise please with transitioning from a paper based system to eQMS and multi site scope ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
L ISO 20417 crucial changes Other Medical Device Related Standards 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom