ISO 13485:2016 Section 5.5.3

Ed Panek

QA RA Small Med Dev Company
Leader
Super Moderator
#1
Does a process require an SOP? we have a requirement in our QMS and ISO 13485 to communicate the effectiveness of the QMS at least monthly to management. We conduct weekly management meetings without formal documentation. Reviewing data from the last several years these meetings have occurred and the requirements are being met weekly.

Further -
0.3 Process approach
This International Standard is based on a process approach to quality management. Any activity that
receives input and converts it to output can be considered as a process. Often the output from one
process directly forms the input to the next process.
For an organization to function effectively, it needs to identify and manage numerous linked processes.
The application of a system of processes within an organization, together with the identification and
interactions of these processes, and their management to produce the desired outcome, can be referred
to as the “process approach.”
When used within a quality management system, such an approach emphasizes the importance of:
a) understanding and meeting requirements;
WE ARE

b) considering processes in terms of added value;
An SOP adds no value

c) obtaining results of process performance and effectiveness;
MINUTES OF MEETINGS ARE RECORDED AND DEMONSTRATE EFFECTIVENESS.

d) improving processes based on objective measurement.
OBJECTIVE DATA SHOWS THIS IS BEING MET.

Is this acceptable?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

William55401

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
I would say it depends. The key word is effectiveness. What, in detail, do you review? Is it a metric based meeting that drives follow up and closure of issues within the QMS? Do the minutes tell that same story? Is the meeting a true engine for improvement and action? Or, is it more of a status or communication meeting?

Ed, if you stopped these meetings would anyone care? Do these meetings compete with your formal mgmt review process where you must make a QMS effectiveness decision?

If these are truly effective meetings that support QMS effectiveness, I would definitely create an SOP (for you, this would just be a section in your mgmt review sop). If not, I would just position them as communication Meetings and remove any reference to them in the QMS.
 

somashekar

Leader
Admin
#3
Does a process require an SOP? we have a requirement in our QMS and ISO 13485 to communicate the effectiveness of the QMS at least monthly to management. We conduct weekly management meetings without formal documentation. Reviewing data from the last several years these meetings have occurred and the requirements are being met weekly.

Further -
0.3 Process approach
This International Standard is based on a process approach to quality management. Any activity that
receives input and converts it to output can be considered as a process. Often the output from one
process directly forms the input to the next process.
For an organization to function effectively, it needs to identify and manage numerous linked processes.
The application of a system of processes within an organization, together with the identification and
interactions of these processes, and their management to produce the desired outcome, can be referred
to as the “process approach.”
When used within a quality management system, such an approach emphasizes the importance of:
a) understanding and meeting requirements;
WE ARE

b) considering processes in terms of added value;
An SOP adds no value

c) obtaining results of process performance and effectiveness;
MINUTES OF MEETINGS ARE RECORDED AND DEMONSTRATE EFFECTIVENESS.

d) improving processes based on objective measurement.
OBJECTIVE DATA SHOWS THIS IS BEING MET.

Is this acceptable?
5.5.3 is about Internal communication and here a SOP not required by the standard. All that is required is communication proceses are established, and effectiveness of the quality management system is communicated.
 

Ed Panek

QA RA Small Med Dev Company
Leader
Super Moderator
#4
I would say it depends. The key word is effectiveness. What, in detail, do you review?

The review varies to current activity from our group. CAPA, audits, DHR, DHF, Suppliers. Basically, what the group did last week, what we are doing this week, and long-term projects are discussed.


Is it a metric-based meeting that drives follow up and closure of issues within the QMS?
Depends on the topic but it can be metric-related.

Do the minutes tell that same story? Is the meeting a true engine for improvement and action? Or, is it more of a status or communication meeting?

Its both. Because all key stakeholders are present its effective at obtaining consensus on the spot since the CEO has direct feedback and direction to other leaders. I relay some metrics around complaints or training and DHR readiness. Some more informal such as the news from the FDA or MDD MDR news. I have an xls template with headings like FDA/13485/CAPA/training/Postmarket surv/ support/ change notices/ and a misc header

Ed, if you stopped these meetings would anyone care? Do these meetings compete with your formal mgmt review process where you must make a QMS effectiveness decision?

We have had these meetings every Monday for the past 10 years. If these were to stop they would be noticed at our annual mgmt review or earlier by internal audits, external audit. These meetings have met the recent 13485 auditors' expectations. I am hesitant to create an SOP at this point as it would add a risk. We hired a consultant who made this a minor finding so here I am. I am justifying that an SOP would not add value as these are a standard business occurence.

If these are truly effective meetings that support QMS effectiveness, I would definitely create an SOP (for you, this would just be a section in your mgmt review sop). If not, I would just position them as communication Meetings and remove any reference to them in the QMS.
Maybe I can just release the template as a reference document in the QMS?

Thanks!

Ed
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
LostLouie DHF linked to ISO 13485:2016? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M ISO 13485:2016 Identification & Traceability ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
K Clause 7.5.2 of ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
FuzzyD ISO 13485:2016 Customer Assessment OFI ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Brexit ISO 13485:2016 + Corrigendum - What does a UKCA DoC require? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
D Audit Report details when ISO 13485:2016 and cGMP 21 CFR 820 are applicable ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
E Theoretical project: Implementing ISO 13485:2016 into a start up acrylic bone cement manufacturer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
M ISO 13485: 2016 Lot numbering question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
Q Documented Evidence of Training ISO 13485: 2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 46
D Customer Survey Example - ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
M Requirements ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
I EN ISO 13485:2016/A11:2021 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
A ISO 13485:2016 Clause 8.2.1 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
FuzzyD ISO 13485:2016 Clause 8.2.6 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
K Can I make an exclusion of Design and Development in ISO 13485:2016 if my product is not regulated ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
B ISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 13485:2016 Gap analysis ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
K 3rd party auditor for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Electronic Signatures - Non-Conformance - ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 38
D Question regarding where "validations" fit according to ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
M Customer Property - ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.5.10 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
H QMS ISO 13485:2016 - ISO14971 IEC60304 etc ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
B Operational Procedures for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
S Inventory Listing and ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M ISO 13485:2016 Certification Scope ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
D Reports under change management | ISO 13485:2016 & ISO 9001:2015 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M ISO 13485:2016 internal audit checklist Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 8
M How Specific in an ISO 13485:2016 Scope for a Contract Manufacturer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
0 ISO 13485:2016 Chapter 8 Integration of the subsections ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
T ISO 13485:2016 Clauses related to process matrix ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
J Can signed agreements over-ride review of every "contract" under ISO 13485:2016? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
Q EN ISO 13485:2016/AC:2018 - AC:2018 being stated in the applicable harmonized standard listing Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
J Leveraging another company's ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M ISO 13485-2016 online certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Supplier Management ISO 13485: 2016- Which supplier needs to fill in a self assessment form? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Definition of equipment for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
M ISO 13485:2016 Complaint Definition Clarity Customer Complaints 2
C ISO 13485 :2016 - CAPA - Does every CAPA need to be checked by regulations? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
P ISO 13485:2016 MDSAP Certification Fee Survey ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
K Contamination Control - Class Is medical devices (Clause 6.4.2 ISO 13485:2016 (E)) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
H ISO 13485:2016 Gap Analysis by NB ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
S SOP for ISO 13485:2016 Quality related Software validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
JoCam Difference between Approval and Registration - ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
K ISO 13485:2016, Clause 4.2.3 Medical Device File ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T Document control ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
A We are ISO 13485:2016 should we be audited to ISO 14971 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
E Equipment Qualification - IQ/OQ per ISO 13485:2016 section 7.5.6 Process validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
S Clinical Evaluation - Is this an ISO 13485:2016 requirement? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
L ISO 13485:2016 Clause 8.4 - Analysis of Audit Observations ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
S When is ISO 13485:2016 6.4.2 Contamination Control appropriate? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11

Similar threads

Top Bottom