ISO 13485 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment - Assess the Validity

#1
Hi All,

Apologies, for my first post, it is quite a long one! I was hoping to get your input with regards the requirement for assessing the validity of previous measuring results please?

"In addition, the organization shall assess and record the validity of the previous measuring results when the equipment is found not to conform to requirements. The organization shall take appropriate action in regard to the equipment and any product affected"

I can come up with a few different ways of addressing this requirement and not sure which should be implemented.

Background: We have a system where all Inspection, Measuring, and Test Equipment (IMTE) is assessed before it is implemented into process. The IMTE, Process, and Calibration, ranges and tolerances are documented, assessed, reviewed, and approved for suitability. Classification is also determined. Product Critical, Business Critical, EHS Critical, Non-Critical.
If an IMTE fails calibration, an impact assessment is completed. This looks at possible impact to product. If possible impact determined, a non-conformance report is raised.

I do think that assessing the validity of previous measuring results is different to product impact but how should this be assessed?

1. I found this statement in an ISO-13485 guide publication:
When a monitoring and measuring device is found inappropriate for use, or its calibration proves to be inaccurate, the organization shall evaluate the validity of the accepted results, along with the ability of any products that were released with this device to meet their requirements
We have already determined that the device is appropriate for use during the implementation phase. But this is saying if the calibration proves to be inaccurate. Am I assessing previous calibration results to ensure these were valid/accurate?

2. This was also in the ISO 13485 guide publication:
To ensure valid measurement and monitoring results, Monitoring and Measurement Device’s must be controlled. A process is required, to control the identification of monitoring measurement, selection, purchase, status, identification, calibration, verification, adjustment or re- adjustment, use, handling, maintenance and storage, training, handling of nonconforming Monitoring and Measurement Device’s, etc
So here, to assess measurement validity, I would assess the form completed when implementing the IMTE to ensure the details here were valid, and that the IMTE was used by trained personnel, and was handled and stored appropriately?

3. This following statement found on a blog about the same:
Assess the affect of the measurements on the quality of the product and whether a potential nonconformity could occur as a result of the improper measurements
I believe we are doing this as part of the product impact assessment

4. My own interpretation was to assess the measurements taken using the out of tolerance IMTE and determine how the results would have been impacted as a result of the failed IMTE. Could we have accepted bad product/rejected good product.

After writing this I would be swaying towards a statement like:
When an Out of Tolerance is identified, a product impact assessment shall be completed, this will include an assessment of measuring results obtained - Possibility of accepting bad product, or rejecting good product. The IMTE implementation form shall also be assessed to ensure the IMTE is appropriate for use. The previous calibration results shall be reviewed to ensure results were valid.

What are your thoughts? Am I over thinking this or going over the top? Since it is specifically called out for in ISO13485, it's difficult not to give it a little extra attention to ensure it is implemented correctly.

Thanks All!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Tagin

Trusted Information Resource
#2
The primary concern, I think, is the risk of occurrence of escapes of nonconforming finished product to customer, where the nonconformance is due to the use of out-of-calibration or inappropriate m/m tools.

So, in my view, roughly, the product impact assessment should look at:
  • potential nonconforming finished product delivered to customers or enroute (escapes)
  • potential nonconforming finished product in finished goods
  • potential nonconforming WIP product
  • potential nonconforming received & inspected components
where the components and/or product was m/m using the discovered out-of-calibration or inappropriate m/m tool. The assessment determines whether the component/product is at risk of being nonconforming due to the specific nature of the m/m failure, and plan for how to mitigate/correct the nonconformances in the product.
 
#3
Thanks Tagin.

That's how I would have always addressed the requirement in the past, but the more I looked into it, the more I thought they were looking for more than a product impact assessment.
The product impact assessments we would have completed would not have looked at the previous calibration results, nor the calibration/device specifications assessment form.
It does seem like these would be beneficial assessments.
 

Tagin

Trusted Information Resource
#4
Thanks Tagin.

That's how I would have always addressed the requirement in the past, but the more I looked into it, the more I thought they were looking for more than a product impact assessment.
The product impact assessments we would have completed would not have looked at the previous calibration results, nor the calibration/device specifications assessment form.
It does seem like these would be beneficial assessments.
>> It does seem like these would be beneficial assessments

Agreed, but I think of those as in the category of root cause investigation: has this tool had a history of going out-of calibration?, is our way of using/storing of this tool causing it to go out-of calibration?, etc.

Whereas the product impact assessment is more about containment.
 
#5
>> It does seem like these would be beneficial assessments

Agreed, but I think of those as in the category of root cause investigation: has this tool had a history of going out-of calibration?, is our way of using/storing of this tool causing it to go out-of calibration?, etc.

Whereas the product impact assessment is more about containment.
Really good point, didn't think of it that way. Food for thought!
Thanks so much for your input
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M ISO 13485 and document control for programs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
N ISO 13485 7.3.9 Change control in medical device software ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Sravan Manchikanti How to interpret '8.3 Control of nonconforming product' for SaMD device while implementing ISO 13485 & MDSAP ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
K Contamination Control - Class Is medical devices (Clause 6.4.2 ISO 13485:2016 (E)) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
T Document control ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
S When is ISO 13485:2016 6.4.2 Contamination Control appropriate? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
D ISO: 13485:2016 Sec. 7.5.2 (C) - Requirements for cleanliness of product or contamination control ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
C 6.3Infrastructure & 6.4Work environnement & contamination control exclusion ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S ISO 13485 Cl. 4.2.5 - Requirements for Control of Records ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
E Definition Integrity - The meaning of the word INTEGRITY in ISO 13485 Control of Records Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 6
GoSpeedRacer ISO 13485:2016 Clause 4.2.5 - Control of Records - HIPAA Requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
G Migrating to an ISO 13485:2016 Compliant Document Control System ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
N Dual ISO 9001 (Manufacturing) and ISO 13485 (Design Control) for same product line ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
T ISO 13485 Label Specifications and Artwork Control ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
L ISO 13485 Document Control - Document Changes - Needing Suggestions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
R ISO 13485 - Security and Control of ERP System ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
C ISO 13485 Clause 7.5.1.2.1 Cleanliness of Product and Contamination Control Question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
L Do ISO 13485 Certified Organizations need to have Control Plans and FMEAs? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
I ISO 13485 Finding regarding Control of Timer Relays in a Coating Process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
P Control of Monitoring and Measurement Devices - ISO 13485 Clause 7.6 says ... ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A ISO 13485, Document Control and Software Validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
B Control of Outsourced Production (Contract Templates) - ISO 13485:2003 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Q ISO 13485 Design Control Procedure for Virtual Manufacturer wanted ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
R ISO 13485 Clause 7.6 Control of Monitoring and measuring devices - Requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
N Poor control of testing chemicals ? which ISO 13485/9001 clause does it contravene? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
D Effective Control of Processes - ISO 13485 Clause 4.2.1 (d) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S 4.2.4 Control of Records - Registered to ISO9001:2000, ISO 13485 and AS9100 Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 9
J Document control - ISO 13485:2003 - Obsolete controlled documents shall be retained? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
B ISO 13485 Calibration Requirements - Requiring a Documented Procedure for control? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
D Notified Bodies - ISO 13485 & MDR Technical Files ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Deviations - Where in ISO 13485 deviations are covered? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
B ISO 13485 Certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
Y ISO 13485:2015 Software Validation IQ/OQ/PQ ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
J ISO 13485 for Metal Finishing Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
S How to calculate Effective Number of People for ISO 13485 Certification? General Auditing Discussions 2
D Question regarding where "validations" fit according to ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
E Any template/ form of Monitoring and Measurement of Processes and product to ISO 13485? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
H ISO 13485-paragraphs for a SaaS SAMD needed or not? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
M Customer Property - ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.5.10 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
pbojsen ISO 13485 Requirements versus FDA product classification and GMP exemptions - Audits ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Lead time to schedule an ISO 13485 audit General Auditing Discussions 2
S Does anyone have a checklist to prepare for ISO 13485, Stage I audit? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
H QMS ISO 13485:2016 - ISO14971 IEC60304 etc ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
B Operational Procedures for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
D ISO 14971 applicability in ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
E ISO 13485 in Clinical Trial conduct: Applicable or No ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
G ISO 13485 Certification - Can we get the ISO 13485 certification prior to shipment of the device? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
N Does anyone use SGS for ISO 13485 / CE certification Registrars and Notified Bodies 0
Ed Panek ISO 13485:2016 Section 5.5.3 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom