ISO 17025:2017 clause 7.6.2 - Performing calibration of its own equipment shall evaluate the measurement uncertainty

#1
Hi everyone,

I'm quite new with ISO 17025 standard and still need a lot to learn and understand.

My current company is accredited in ISO 17025 as a Testing Laboratory. However my company also performing calibration on equipment especially our own equipment which currently I found that they do not have the measurement uncertainty. While some of the equipment, my company will send to accredited Lab to perform calibration where they will provide a complete certificate with the measurement uncertainty.

My question is since we are not accredited in calibration do my company still need to provide calibration with evaluation of measurement uncertainty to satisfy clause 7.6.2?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

lawcch

Involved In Discussions
#2
Hi everyone,

I'm quite new with ISO 17025 standard and still need a lot to learn and understand.

My current company is accredited in ISO 17025 as a Testing Laboratory. However my company also performing calibration on equipment especially our own equipment which currently I found that they do not have the measurement uncertainty. While some of the equipment, my company will send to accredited Lab to perform calibration where they will provide a complete certificate with the measurement uncertainty.

My question is since we are not accredited in calibration do my company still need to provide calibration with evaluation of measurement uncertainty to satisfy clause 7.6.2?
definitely. YES.. either your lab accredited or not, you still have to ensure that every calibration work must calculate and include all TOTAL measurement uncertainty (MU) base on GUM documents or technical standards. It is a a very difficult technical subject to explain here. I advise you to attend professional training and you must be very good in statistical techniques and data analysis. Also, you must identify sources contributed to your total MU base on the number of processes or steps involve in the calibration processes.
Not only you need to attend technical training but you must have working experience in calibration works in order to become a competent technicians to do calibration or testing jobs. It is all mentioned in ISO/IEC 17025 on competence of personnel and calibration of your own measuring equipment in the lab.
 
#3
definitely. YES.. either your lab accredited or not, you still have to ensure that every calibration work must calculate and include all TOTAL measurement uncertainty (MU) base on GUM documents or technical standards. It is a a very difficult technical subject to explain here. I advise you to attend professional training and you must be very good in statistical techniques and data analysis. Also, you must identify sources contributed to your total MU base on the number of processes or steps involve in the calibration processes.
Not only you need to attend technical training but you must have working experience in calibration works in order to become a competent technicians to do calibration or testing jobs. It is all mentioned in ISO/IEC 17025 on competence of personnel and calibration of your own measuring equipment in the lab.
Thanks for the explanation
 

lawcch

Involved In Discussions
#4
My question is since we are not accredited in calibration do my company still need to provide calibration with evaluation of measurement uncertainty to satisfy clause 7.6.2?
I think you must specify what type of accuracy you want to achieve in your own verification of measuring equipment. If you want to perform your own calibration even though you do testing work , your reference measuring equipment must has traceable to national or international standard .and you must specify what level of accuracy you want to achieve in your calibration. Therefore, I would NOT advise you to do your own calibration work for yur measuring equipment which use in your testing lab. It is an expensive affair to do a lot calibration for your measuring glassware, thermometers, relative humidity , dewpoint meter, oven or furnaces , etc.
If your management is serious about lab accreditation , you must spend a lot of money to do calibration works on all your measuring equipment so that you can calculate your own MU in doing testing works.
 
#5
My question is since we are not accredited in calibration do my company still need to provide calibration with evaluation of measurement uncertainty to satisfy clause 7.6.2?
I think you must specify what type of accuracy you want to achieve in your own verification of measuring equipment. If you want to perform your own calibration even though you do testing work , your reference measuring equipment must has traceable to national or international standard .and you must specify what level of accuracy you want to achieve in your calibration. Therefore, I would NOT advise you to do your own calibration work for yur measuring equipment which use in your testing lab. It is an expensive affair to do a lot calibration for your measuring glassware, thermometers, relative humidity , dewpoint meter, oven or furnaces , etc.
If your management is serious about lab accreditation , you must spend a lot of money to do calibration works on all your measuring equipment so that you can calculate your own MU in doing testing works.
Yes, we have Master or reference equipment which is used to either calibrate or verify the equipment and It is traceable to national or international standard. The issue that concern me is no measurement uncertainty but only data been recorded after the calibration been performed by the responsible technician. I would take into account your suggestion and advice, Thank you.
 

Gus

Involved In Discussions
#6
Yes, we have Master or reference equipment which is used to either calibrate or verify the equipment and It is traceable to national or international standard. The issue that concern me is no measurement uncertainty but only data been recorded after the calibration been performed by the responsible technician. I would take into account your suggestion and advice, Thank you.
I'd like to keep this short and useful so here's the basics that i think are at fault (i am the supervisor of a 17025 accredited Test Lab) and not to confuse you with the "why its important", "GUM" etc.. @lawcch covered this pretty thoroughly


For one thing, you as a Test Lab are required by 7.6.1 to identify and evaluate Uncertainty on your own methods, this by itself requires that you factor into this "math" the uncertainty of your equipment, therefore forcing you to have uncertainty reported on every single Calibration certificate from your equipment that has a impact on the results of your test.

i second the opinion that its not ideal for you to calibrate your own equipment, having said that, there are cases where you might have to do so, (for example in our case we use an externally calibrated metrology well and PRT to calibrate our thermocouples, we use loads of them, and it would be ridiculously costly and time ineffective to send each one of them for external calibration) but you absolutely have to try in keep the traceability chain as short as possible on your side to avoid headaches when calculating additional uncertainty, you have to make sure you get some training on uncertainty measurement, i recommend you hire an expert and work on your particular case and document it well,you might even make it so you measure uncertainty on the entire process and you are home free!, IMHO the GUM is quite a handful to try and do it alone.

Another thing to watch out for when doing this is auditor bias... calibrating your own equipment may be viewed as a risk to impartiallity or some other kind of risk
 
#7
I'd like to keep this short and useful so here's the basics that i think are at fault (i am the supervisor of a 17025 accredited Test Lab) and not to confuse you with the "why its important", "GUM" etc.. @lawcch covered this pretty thoroughly


For one thing, you as a Test Lab are required by 7.6.1 to identify and evaluate Uncertainty on your own methods, this by itself requires that you factor into this "math" the uncertainty of your equipment, therefore forcing you to have uncertainty reported on every single Calibration certificate from your equipment that has a impact on the results of your test.

i second the opinion that its not ideal for you to calibrate your own equipment, having said that, there are cases where you might have to do so, (for example in our case we use an externally calibrated metrology well and PRT to calibrate our thermocouples, we use loads of them, and it would be ridiculously costly and time ineffective to send each one of them for external calibration) but you absolutely have to try in keep the traceability chain as short as possible on your side to avoid headaches when calculating additional uncertainty, you have to make sure you get some training on uncertainty measurement, i recommend you hire an expert and work on your particular case and document it well,you might even make it so you measure uncertainty on the entire process and you are home free!, IMHO the GUM is quite a handful to try and do it alone.

Another thing to watch out for when doing this is auditor bias... calibrating your own equipment may be viewed as a risk to impartiallity or some other kind of risk
Thank you for your explanation. Both of you are really helpful.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M ISO 17025:2017 Clause 6.4 - Measuring Equipment Validity ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
B ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.1.3 - Decision Rule ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
I ISO 17025:2017 / ANAB 3125 - Articulating / Communicating Risks vis-a-vis Audit Findings ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
P Filled in F48/F49 for internal audit ISO 17025:2017 Internal Auditing 2
K Integrating ISO 9001:2015 with ISO 17025:2017 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
T ISO 17025:2017 requirement 5.7.b. about maintenance the integrity of the management system ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
R Who is the customer in the ISO/IEC 17025:2017? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
G ISO 17025-2017 Management Review reporting items - Inputs ISO 17025 related Discussions 14
I Approved Suppliers ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and used test equipment ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
W Issuing reports under ISO 17025:2017 ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
S The (E) in ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E) ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
T ISO 17025:2017 Clause 4.2.2 - The difference between "be notified" and "be informed" ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
G ISO 17025:2017 Uninterrupted chain of traceability for test laboratories ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
V IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7, sub clause 7.11 Control of data and information management ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
V IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 4.1 Impartiality ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
F ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.7 Ensuring the validity of results - Threshold ISO 17025 related Discussions 9
F ISO 17025:2017 Format for Procedure and Records Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
F ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.4.1 - Requirements for Procedures ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
F ISO 17025:2017 mandatory documentation requirements ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
C ISO 17025 2017, Requirement 6.6.3 - Communicate requirements to external providers ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
D Risk Assessment Procedure in accordance with ISO 17025:2017 ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
G ISO 17025:2017 7.1.2 - Should I produce a document for the customer? ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
S Can anybody share a sample risk assessment prepared based on ISO 17025:2017? ISO 17025 related Discussions 15
U ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.7 Ensuring the Validity of Calibration Results ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
Douglas E. Purdy ISO/IEC 17025:2017 3rd Ed. Changes from 2nd Ed. ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
Douglas E. Purdy ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 8 & Annex B ISO 17025 related Discussions 11
D Looking for PowerPoint presentation for ISO 17025:2017 ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Ajit Basrur Informational ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Published - November 2017 ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
K ISO 17025 Method Validation and Verification for Test Lab ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
R ISO 17025 Lead Assessor Training ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
J ISO 17025 Calibration Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
E ISO 17025 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
R Basic Lab Practices - related to ISO 17025 testing labs ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
D Training for ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
D How to handle suppliers that are not ISO 17025 certified ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
J What risk to cover when NOT using ISO 17025 accredited/certified labs for calibration ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
Quality Specialist Quick question on the sequence of ISO 17025 external audits ISO 17025 related Discussions 14
K ISO 17025 Facilities and environmental conditions SOP ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
E Organisational Chart-ISO 17025 Laboratory ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
Casana ISO 17025 - Contractor certification? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
B Sanctioned interpretation #10 - ISO 17025 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
G Compliance with ISO 9001-2015 for ISO 17025 Accredited Labs? ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
D Management reviews ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
W What is okay to use as a reference material for ISO 17025? ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
AllTheThings ISO-17025 accredited TEST lab performing internal calibrations (Yes: Here is how) ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
D Question on Documented Calibration versus ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
M Transferring ISO 17025 from one company to another ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
X ISO 17025 certification for Laboratory for online gambling products ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
R ISO 17025 - ISO Guides 33 & 80 ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
T ISO 17025: Lockout/Tagout Requirement ISO 17025 related Discussions 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom