ISO 17025 - Requirement to Monitor Environment

greif

Involved In Discussions
#1
Looking to get our first 17025 audit around December. Right now I have auto temp and RH logging only in one area, the other areas have thermohygrometers.

With the auto log I print a graph of the history once a month for a record.
Do I need more than this to keep the auditor happy?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
Looking to get our first 17025 audit around December. Right now I have auto temp and RH logging only in one area, the other areas have thermohygrometers.

With the auto log I print a graph of the history once a month for a record.
Do I need more than this to keep the auditor happy?
Who knows? Predicting auditor "happiness" is like the lottery. However, you should offer that which shows you have control over the environmental conditions. If they are not happy, tell them to pack sand.
 

greif

Involved In Discussions
#3
Well! Auditors aside, does this group think my combos of thermohygrometers and one logging location shows I have control of the environment?

What do you other folks do?

(our measurements are all dimensional or photometric).
 
#4
Well! Auditors aside, does this group think my combos of thermohygrometers and one logging location shows I have control of the environment?

What do you other folks do?

(our measurements are all dimensional or photometric).
How big is the lab? What influences on a stable reading are present (doors, windows etc?) Have you done any monitoring across the lab to determine any gradient etc?
 

greif

Involved In Discussions
#5
We do measurements in various parts of the building. Typical office conditions.

We have one instrument in a temp/rh controlled clean room for which we specify the max measuring conditions to be 65-70 F, 35-50% RH.

In the office areas we specify the max conditions as;
66-76 F, 5-70% RH.

Temperature range potential changes are included in our uncertainties.

The overall building is 3 floors around 15000 SF total. Individual rooms are typ. 15 x 25 ft.

We report the temp and rh at time of measurement.
 
#6
Sounds good to me. I understand that Lab Accreditation auditors can sometimes "whip out" an experience and use that to ask the "what if" question, but who knows?
 

dwperron

Trusted Information Resource
#7
First, the only areas that will be audited are the ones where 17025 accredited calibration or testing takes place.

In those areas you will need to document (they will ask for the document) the environmental conditions required to be suitable for laboratory activities. That will include temperature and humidity, but can include anything that can influence your results, such as vibration, dust, or electrical supply quality.

The lab shall "monitor, control, and record environmental conditions". You need to be able to produce records that show that the conditions are within the controls you have established (and what happens if they drift out of control), this will be true for all areas where 17025 activities are conducted.

You can probably get away with thermohygrometers and showing that you are recording the data on your records, but be prepared to prove that those areas have been kept in control. That's why most labs have recorders in each area, so they can produce the history.
 

greif

Involved In Discussions
#8
We have procedures written that state "Do Not Measure" if outside the state temp. and %RH range. Would that be considered adequate control?
 

dwperron

Trusted Information Resource
#9
Typically there is also something about who has authority to stop and resume work.

Unless you have alarms set on your monitoring devices they might ask how you know that conditions didn't change after hours, possibly affecting equipment that would need time to stabilize.
 

ScottBP

Involved In Discussions
#10
We have temperature/RH dataloggers in most of our lab rooms, and we do accredited calibrations in most of those rooms. My question is:

1. Do the dataloggers (or their probes) necessarily need to be accredited themselves?
2. Is a single point calibration at ambient conditions sufficient, or do we need to calibrate them for linearity at three points?
3. Do we necessarily need to report the datalogger/probe on calibration certificates?

From time to time we have assessors cite us for all three. Our argument against number 1 is that we are only monitoring the lab conditions for compliance to our quality system. Our argument against number 2 is that we have so many probes (49 at last count) spread across several locations that it's logistically difficult taking a unit out of service and shipping it off for calibration, so instead they're calibrated in place against a calibrated master probe. Our argument against number 3 is that the item being calibrated does not have any parameter traceable to the probe in that room that would matter (e.g. a 2% panel volt meter).

So what say ye?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T ISO 17025:2017 requirement 5.7.b. about maintenance the integrity of the management system ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
C Compliance with ISO 17025 requirement 8.4.2 - Controls - Records recovery ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
A ISO 17025 Requirement 6.2 - Department Manager Testing Qualifications ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
C ISO 17025 2017, Requirement 6.6.3 - Communicate requirements to external providers ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
rob73 Requirement for independent certification of device using an ISO 17025 laboratory EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Sean Kelley What is the ISO 17025 Certified Laboratory Requirement for External Calibration? ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
R Implementation of ISO/IEC 17025 Requirement for our Test Laboratory ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
M Specific Requirement for Calibration - ISO 17025 Clause 5.6.2 Interpretations ISO 17025 related Discussions 15
D Scales calibrated by an ISO 17025 accredited organization? TS 16949 requirement? ISO 17025 related Discussions 44
R Is passing 'Measurement Audit' a requirement for ISO 17025 Acrreditation? ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
Sidney Vianna How to audit this ISO 17025 requirement? ISO 17025 related Discussions 7
A ISO 17025 - Methods validation and clients ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
S Thoughts on managing ISO 9001, 13485, IATF 16949 and 17025 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
R Who is the customer in the ISO/IEC 17025:2017? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
G ISO 17025-2017 Management Review reporting items - Inputs ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
S High voltage testing - ISO 17025 - 7.2.2 Validation of methods and 7.3 Sampling ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
S Internal calibrations - Part of an ISO 17025 accredited testing laboratory (Automotive) ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
I Approved Suppliers ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and used test equipment ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
W Issuing reports under ISO 17025:2017 ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
S The (E) in ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E) ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
T ISO 17025:2017 Clause 4.2.2 - The difference between "be notified" and "be informed" ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
G ISO 17025:2017 Uninterrupted chain of traceability for test laboratories ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
DuncanGibbons Who are ISO/IEC 17065 and 17025 applicable to? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
V IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7, sub clause 7.11 Control of data and information management ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
V IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 4.1 Impartiality ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
F ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.7 Ensuring the validity of results - Threshold ISO 17025 related Discussions 9
F ISO 17025 8.6.2 Customer Feedback Analysis ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
F ISO 17025 8.8 Internal Audits in a segmented company ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
F Faulty Equipment and ISO 17025 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
F Online courses - Metrology, standardization, calibration and ISO 17025 Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
F Proficiency Testing for ISO 17025: AC Current Ranges ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
F ISO 17025:2017 Format for Procedure and Records Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
F ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.4.1 - Requirements for Procedures ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
F Complying with ISO 17025 by UNIDO ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
F Measurement Audit and ILC for ISO 17025 Clause 7.7.2 - Comparison with results of other laboratories ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
F ISO 17025:2017 mandatory documentation requirements ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
F Linking an ISO 31000 Risk management SOP to ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
K ISO 17025:2017 clause 7.6.2 - Performing calibration of its own equipment shall evaluate the measurement uncertainty ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
D Risk Assessment Procedure in accordance with ISO 17025:2017 ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
A Validation of Calibration Methods and Traceability - ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
J ISO 17025 - Please share a sample procedure for monitoring the validity of results ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
J ISO 17025 Documented Procedure for 6.2.5 - Determining competency ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
G ISO 17025:2017 7.1.2 - Should I produce a document for the customer? ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
G ISO 9001 and ISO 17025 - Measuring tools not in calibration system General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
S Can anybody share a sample risk assessment prepared based on ISO 17025:2017? ISO 17025 related Discussions 15
U ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.7 Ensuring the Validity of Calibration Results ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
G From an ISO 17025 auditor perspective must micrometer calibration check anvil flatness? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S ISO 17025 Requirements for Mobile On-site Calibration ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
C Must your reference standard provider be ISO17034 certified to meet your testing lab's ISO 17025 certification requirements? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
S The procedure for replicate check in calibration lab as per ISO 17025 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom