ISO 2859-2 LQL sampling plan linked to %confidence/%reliability

#1
Although this is my first post to this forum I have been reading this treasure trove of high quality information for a while now and want to express my gratitude to this community. Thank you for all your guidance and advice!

Then, onto my situation:
- we produce small LOT's (50 to 100 a batch) of disposable, sterile class IIa medical devices
- we have implemented a destructive sample check to verify the quality of these products after manufacturing & sterilisation
- we had implemented a ISO 2859-1 AQL based sample plan (so a inspection by attributes and AQL levels based on Risk Management) BUT we got feedback from our notified body that for design verification and validation a ISO 2859-2 LQL sampling plan linked to %Confidence/%reliability levels coming from Risk Management.

My question being:
From what I have understood the required sample size for a attributes inspection with c=0 (all samples should pass the test) can be calculated as:
n=ln(1-confidence)/ln(reliability)
(e.g. 95% confidence /90% reliability would result in n=29)
However: how as n is not linked to a LOT size how can one link this to LQL levels?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#3
i was further reviewing certain articles...

ref. slide 20 :- Acceptance Quality Limits and Visual Inspection
• Understand the sample size is unrelated to population size (in most situations).

The Effect of Lot Size
The "discrimination" or protection provided by a sampling plan depends primarily on the number of units inspected and the acceptance number. Lot size has only a minor effect limited to the case when 10% or more of the lot is inspected.
Since Type-B OC curves represent worse case, sampling plans selected based on Type-B OC curves can be used to inspect any lot regardless of size. When selecting statistically valid sampling plans, it is not necessary to use different sampling plans for different lot sizes. A better strategy is to select one sampling plan based on the protection it provides, i.e., its OC curve.

so the emphasis is more on thinking through on selection of sampling plan, vs the lot size.:agree:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N Sampling Plan for Internal Audits - ISO 2859 or 3951 - Or Neither? Internal Auditing 6
A ISO 2859-1 - 9.3.3.2 Switching score - Sampling Plans and PPM AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 0
A ISO 2859 Single Sampling - Clarification regarding the sampling table Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
M Accept/Reject (Ac/Re) Numbers (ISO 2859-1) Confusion Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
L Table 2-A from ISO 2859-1 - AQLs from 150 to 1000 Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
L What changed in Amendment 1:2011 in the ISO 2859-1:1999? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
N Use of arrows in ISO 2859-1 Table 1 and 2-A sampling plan Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
N Sampling for Internal Test based upon ISO 2859-1, G-I Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
A MIL STD 105 D or ISO 2859-2? Receiving Metal Sheets Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 6
S Military Sampling Plan 105E vs. ISO 2859-1 AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 2
I Alpha and Beta in the Sampling Plan for ISO 2859 & ISO 3951 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 13
D Disposable Medical Device Sampling Plans per ISO 2859-1 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
P ISO 3951 vs. ISO 2859 for Medical Device Components ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S ISO 2859-1 or Ansi ASQ Z1.4 in using AQL or AOQL - Need Help Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
T Difference between MIL-STD-105 and ISO 2859 AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 2
E Which sampling table (ISO-2859) must I use on different lot sizes Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
D ISO 2859 - Probability that sample size is sufficient Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
0 AQL Sampling Plan based upon ISO 2859 AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 1
D ISO 2859 to set up a Sampling Program in a Food Manufacturing Company Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
Q What are the differences between ANSI Z1.4, ANSI Z1.9, and ISO 2859-2? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
T Special Inspection Level 3 (S-3) per ANSI Z 1.4 & its relationship with ISO 2859-1 AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 1
P Medical device functional test - ISO 2859 or 3951 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
G Sampling plans for large quantities along lines of ISO 2859-1:1999 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
R Sampling Plans - ISO 2859-1: 1999 - How to calculate the switching score? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
I Asian Supplier Sampling Plans besides MIL-STD-105? My thought was ISO 2859? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
H Incoming Inspection Sampling Plan ISO 2859-1/ ISO 2859-2 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
S Developing sampling plans based on AS1199, ISO 2859-1 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
T ISO 2859-3 - Skip-lot sampling procedures - Unauthorized Inspection Frequency Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
T I would like to implement ISO 2859 standard for Incoming (Receiving) Inspection Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 3
C Software or Excel .xls spreadsheet to calculate sample size and the AQL - ISO 2859-1 AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 2
Stuart Andrews Sampling Plans (ISO 2859-1)(BS6001-1) - Probability of defects within a lot Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
C Production and Post Production feedback - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
T ISO 13485 - 5.5.1 Responsibility and authority - Small Company Independence ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
A Refusal to discuss ISO 9001 obligations... what to do? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
A What does this sentence "this symbol shall be used in the orientation shown" mean in ISO 780:2015? Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
B Can we be ISO 9001 certified without a physical office? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
D Test summary report example for design validation wanted - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
J Informational ISO 24971:2020 Released ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 0
S ISO 45001 and outsourcing the transporation of products Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 3
S Documenting Design Verification Test Results (ISO 9001) Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
A Question on ISO 14001:2015 - Are annual audits required? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 8
N Which EN ISO 17664 version compliance to EU MDR? Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 3
Sidney Vianna Informational New edition of ISO 29001 released (June 2020) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
R Who is the customer in the ISO/IEC 17025:2017? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
T ISO 13485 - Process validation at critical suppliers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
L Combining 3 ISO 9001 registrations into 1 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
M Risk Analysis Flow - Confusion between ISO 14971 and IEC 62304 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 7
C Compliance with ISO 17025 requirement 8.4.2 - Controls - Records recovery ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
N EN ISO 13640:2002 vs EN ISO 23640:2011 Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
O ISO 13485 vs. GMP - Comparison matrix wanted EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom