SBS - The best value in QMS software

ISO 3951 - Sampling procedure for Inspection by Variables Data

B

biju-joseph

#1
Hi
need help on revised iso 3951 sampling procedure for inspection by variable , looks like the new procedure is more complicated and we need to identify the "K" factor and do the calculation to compare to analyze the lot is acceptable or not.
can I use 2859 for variable

thank you in advance

Biju joseph
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Re: ISO 3951 -sampling procedure for inspection by variable

The short answer is you cannot use 2859 which is for attribute sampling for variable data. Where are you having an issue with 3951. If you look at the example, the calculations are pretty straightforward.
 
W

Waeller

#3
Re: ISO 3951 -sampling procedure for inspection by variable

Hi Statistical Seven,

Thank you for the statement concerning the use of 3951 vs 2859.
But still - I have some questions:

1) E.g.: Measuring a length having an upper and lower spec limit, uncertainty considerations included in the measurement. Isn't it possible to define parts in within spec as "confirming" and out of spec as "non confirming" and use this judgement as attributive and use 2859?

2) Asuming non normality:
Transforming the distribution into normality, means transforming the limits as well. What about the k-factors? Aren't they calculated based on a normal distribution?

Thanks for any hint
Waeller

P.S.
I Would like to ask my company statistician, if there is one!
 

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
Re: ISO 3951 -sampling procedure for inspection by variable

Hi Statistical Seven,

Thank you for the statement concerning the use of 3951 vs 2859.
But still - I have some questions:

1) E.g.: Measuring a length having an upper and lower spec limit, uncertainty considerations included in the measurement. Isn't it possible to define parts in within spec as "confirming" and out of spec as "non confirming" and use this judgement as attributive and use 2859?
You can always convert a continuous measurement into a attribute measurements as you described. Understand that the sample size requirement per 2859 is much larger than the 3951 for the same coverage.Not usually worth the additional work (i.e. 200 for attribute versus 33 for variable)

2) Asuming non normality:
Transforming the distribution into normality, means transforming the limits as well. What about the k-factors? Aren't they calculated based on a normal distribution?
Yes they are based on the normal distribution, but the transformation makes your data normal, so the K value is not transformed.
Thanks for any hint
Waeller

P.S.
I Would like to ask my company statistician, if there is one!
Without a company statistician, you should get a consultant or contract statistician on retainer.
 
W

Waeller

#5
Re: ISO 3951 -sampling procedure for inspection by variable

Hi Statistical Seven,

I need to follow up on the ISO-3951 and in addition on 11608-1.
Both need normal distributions to calculate the tolerance limits (x_bar +- K* S).

My question:
Is it possible to judge the tolerance limits - even the distribution is not a normal one - with the equation above?
Wouldn't it be more critical if not centered distributions with higher standard deviations
would be traeted as if they were normal distributions?

Thanks for any hint
Waeller
 

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
Re: ISO 3951 -sampling procedure for inspection by variable

The ISO-3951 is based on normality. There are some adjustments for non-normal data, but in general when the data is non-normal it helps to understand the underlying distribution to calculate the sample size.

I use 16269-6 for tolerance intervals. It has the formulas for non-normal tolerance intervals. Be aware that the minimum sample size for non-normal or distribution free tolerance intervals are quite large to get the coverage you desire.

Hi Statistical Seven,

I need to follow up on the ISO-3951 and in addition on 11608-1.
Both need normal distributions to calculate the tolerance limits (x_bar +- K* S).

My question:
Is it possible to judge the tolerance limits - even the distribution is not a normal one - with the equation above?
Wouldn't it be more critical if not centered distributions with higher standard deviations
would be traeted as if they were normal distributions?

Thanks for any hint
Waeller
 
W

Waeller

#7
Hi Statistical Seven,

thank you very much for the fast reply. But as usual 1 answer lead to more questions.

In the 3951 there is a relation between AQL =0,01, n=63 and k=3.2xx for code letters P or Q for the s-method.

In 16296 only ordered statistics are mentioned e.g. v+w for 1 to 20 and a sample size number.
Is there a way to relate a given/definded AQL to this distribution free sample size and/or distribution free 2-sided tolerance limits?

Thank you very much
Waeller

PS
...im still looking for a company statistician ....
 

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#8
Not sure I follow your question, but 3951 does index by AQL. ISO 3951 is for acceptance sampling by variables and the k-values are not the same k-value for tolerance intervals.

16269 gives distribution free and normal tolerance interval methods.

Hi Statistical Seven,

thank you very much for the fast reply. But as usual 1 answer lead to more questions.

In the 3951 there is a relation between AQL =0,01, n=63 and k=3.2xx for code letters P or Q for the s-method.

In 16296 only ordered statistics are mentioned e.g. v+w for 1 to 20 and a sample size number.
Is there a way to relate a given/definded AQL to this distribution free sample size and/or distribution free 2-sided tolerance limits?

Thank you very much
Waeller

PS
...im still looking for a company statistician ....
 
W

Waeller

#9
Hi Statistical Seven,

I'm sorry for not cleary getting to the point. Yes, I'm looking for some acceptance sampling plans or methods.

What do I have to apply, if I have an AQL=0,01 to fullfil and the data of the measured variable is not normal distributed - and can not be transformed into normal data. And the lot size is about 100k to 150k.

e.g destructive Dial Torque meaurements, no target value, only upper and lower limits.
LSL 10mNm
USL 95mNm


Waeller
 

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#10
Hi Statistical Seven,

I'm sorry for not cleary getting to the point. Yes, I'm looking for some acceptance sampling plans or methods.

What do I have to apply, if I have an AQL=0,01 to fullfil and the data of the measured variable is not normal distributed - and can not be transformed into normal data. And the lot size is about 100k to 150k.

e.g destructive Dial Torque meaurements, no target value, only upper and lower limits.
LSL 10mNm
USL 95mNm


Waeller
Waeller

Here are several options, not are better than others, but just how I approach a problem like this.

First I try to under why my data is not normal for a two-sided specification of torque. I expect non-normality with a one-sided specification, but usually do not see normality unless it's bi-modal. If the data is in fact bi-modal, then acceptance testing is a complex issue as you need to know the distribution of the parts from each mode. Without a fundamental understanding of the data, using continuous (either normality or non-normality) acceptance is an exercise in futility.

My usual response is that though we measure torque as a continuous value, we can use attribute based sampling as the parts either pass or don't pass. Again, without a distributional assumption about the data, cannot calculate the mean and standard deviation to predict percent out of specification.

You can use reliability type models to predict probability of exceeding the specification using different sample sizes based on exponential or weibull models. This is NOT a perfect solution, and requires an iterative process for finding the best solution.

Assume normality and use 3951. This is ONLY used if the lack of normality is small and the cause is from "outliers".

Otherwise, I am stumped!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N Sampling Plan for Internal Audits - ISO 2859 or 3951 - Or Neither? Internal Auditing 6
I Alpha and Beta in the Sampling Plan for ISO 2859 & ISO 3951 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 13
F AQL - ISO 3951-4:2011 Sampling Plan Requirements AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 2
M Where to buy ISO 3951-1 and ISO 3951-2 standard copy Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
P ISO 3951 vs. ISO 2859 for Medical Device Components ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
I Does anyone here have experience with ISO 3951? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 3
P Medical device functional test - ISO 2859 or 3951 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
S Need help to test my excel worksheet based on ISO 3951 Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 1
E ISO 2895/3951 Switching Inspection Rules Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 11
M Change in Constitution / Ownership of firm -------ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
P ISO 9001 certification with zero customers? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
M ISO 14971 Determination of Competent Persons ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
R Clinical accuracy and repeatability of IR(infrared) thermometer, no maximum error criteria is recommended in ISO Other Medical Device Related Standards 10
Q The scope of ISO 21534 Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
A What must be recorded? (ISO 9001:2015, subclause 10.2) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
M ISO 14971:2019: Criteria for overall residual risk ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
B Updated IATF 16949 - Will IATF 16949 get revised when ISO 9001:202X is released? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
S ISO 9001:2015 vs 21 CFR Part 211 matrix Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
N Quality Compliance Officer - ISO 13485, London Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 1
T ISO 17025: Lockout/Tagout Requirement ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
N ISO 9001 implementation in a Gold exporting business ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
M Does the ISO 9001:2015 standard require a disaster recovery plan or emergency response plan ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
E ISO 13485 QMS certification as a Supplier ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
A Environmental Compliance obligations and risks (ISO 14001:2015 6.1.3) ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
R ISO 17025 vertical audit checklist wanted Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
A Tips and Tricks to understand ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
M ISO 9001 Major Nonconformance Internal Audit Schedule/COVID-19 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
T ISO 13485:2016 Clauses related to process matrix ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
K ISO 50001 Consultant wanted Paid Consulting, Training and Services 0
K Comparison wanted: ISO 15378:2018 vs. PS9000:2016 Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
B ISO 9001 - "Remote Audit Fee" Registrars and Notified Bodies 13
R Risk control measures as per ISO 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 6
John C. Abnet ISO 45001:2018 (5.4 - Consultation and participation of workers) Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Sidney Vianna What ISO Standard (under the TC 176) supports the UN Sustainable Development Goal #10? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 11
S ISO 15223-1:2020 Symbols Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
John C. Abnet ISO 9001 4.4.1 "...shall determine the processes needed..." ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 72
R ISO 10993-18 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
J Can signed agreements over-ride review of every "contract" under ISO 13485:2016? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
R Applicable ISO standards - packaging and others Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
J Implementing an ISO 13485 QMS Software ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Q EN ISO 13485:2016/AC:2018 - AC:2018 being stated in the applicable harmonized standard listing Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
M ISO 10993-17 - Ancillary Medicinal substance leachables Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Medical Devices - Ancillary - ISO 10993-17 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
J Leveraging another company's ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
J New Job Position - Achieving ISO 13485 Certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S ISO 9001 Clause 8.2.3 - Review of the requirements for products and services in a Cafe ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
A ISO 17025 - Methods validation and clients ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
A Scope of ISO 13485 certificate ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
A ASL requirement when the supplier is certified for ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D ISO 9001 certificate issued by QMS International for 10 years - legit? Registrars and Notified Bodies 17

Similar threads

Top Bottom