ISO 45001:2018 - Occupational Health and Safety Management Standard

#91
Hello !

I am retired from my company (a large French international company) and I can not speak for him anymore. But we had a prevention processus of psychosocial risks at work. In my company, these risks were not the object of conventional reactive indicators such as enumeration or frequency of accident or near-miss, but with more specific indicators.

On the other hand, our approach was more proactive: our occupational risk assessment processus incorporated a specific psychosocial risk assessment component to consider their primary prevention.

But it is certain that these risks are not treated as chemical risks or noise given their very nature and that we are less familiar with their treatment. And
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#92
(following)

Companies are "cautious" to address these risks because their management and their organization are in question. These psychosocial risks are collective et organizational (company level) while many managers prefer to think these risks are rather "personal" and "individual" (employees level).

We find the sources of risk in factors such as intensity and working time, emotional demands of work, lack of autonomy in the work, deteriorated social relations at work, conflicts of values, insecurity of the work situation, perceived or suffered by employees...

Bye.
 
Last edited:
#93
(other following)

Some lecture : Demand/Control Model: a Social, Emotional, and Physiological Approach to Stress Risk and Active Behaviour

Here the summary of the tool (document "evaluate PsychoSocial Risk factors, the PSR tool", see attachment to translate in your language... sorry) I used in my company to assess PsychoSocial Risk (PSR):

User Guide :
Who should fill in the evaluation grid? page 8
How to use the evaluation grid? p8
What to pay attention to during the exchanges? p9
Summary of the assessment of PSR factors by work unit p9
Psychosocial Risk Assessment Matrix per Unit of Work :
Intensity and complexity of work p13
Difficult work schedules p16
Emotional requirements p18
Low work autonomy p20
Worsened social relations at work p22
Conflicts of values p24
Job and working insecurity p25
Summary table of psychosocial risks factors assessment per unit of work p27


But here we are far from the general notion of OH&SMS according to ISO 45001 ... ;)

Bye.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

blockbuster

Starting to get Involved
#94
Hello !

Blockbuster, to assess OH&S risks from identified hazards, "while taking into account the effectiveness of existing controls" means to assess the "current" risks, as assessed by today's reality of work situations "with" or "after" the prevention dispenses already in place and practiced... In other words, it is a question of assessing the real risks and not the "initial", "raw" or "theoretical" risks "without" or "before" the effectiveness of existing controls.

I try a trivial ilustration: I drive my car according to the regulation, it is consistent and in good condition, I drive on a highway in great weather, there is little traffic, I did not drink alcohol, etc. ... I will not start my assessment of risk of accident considering that my car has no brake and that its wheels are smooth, that I roll on a dirt track at too high speed, the weather conditions are bad and I am drunk, etc... to then "apply" fictional the goods points of the reality !

Another simpler but equally trivial example: I'm standing on a balcony on the tenth floor of a building to enjoy the view. I will directly consider (evaluate) that the risk of falling from the balcony is zero because there is a railing! That is to say, I will not evaluate this situation at first by considering the risk of crashing to the ground as if there were no railings (stupid gross risk!) ... to "apply" in a second time the already existing "guardrail" prevention measure and finally consider that I don't risk to fall into the void (current non-risk directly evaluable, otherwise I think I would not put myself in such situation on this balcony).

Other: if I want to measure which quantity of dangerous vapors I breathe (risk assessment) when I am on a workstation equipped with a vapor collection system. I will not stopping this aspiration (= not taking into account the effectiveness of existing controls) before ! I will do my measurement "while taking into account the effectiveness of existing controls" as said in ISO 45001 = I keep the vapor collection system running !

Ok ?
Thanks, I get all that. To get to the thrust of where I am coming from. Let's say that I have done everything required by 6.1.2.2 (a) but without using a scoring matrix, then how can I then satisfy the requirements of 6.1.2.2 (b) relating to defining what our 'methodologies' and criteria are if I don't use a numbering system?

Cheers,

Block
 
#95
Hello !

Blockbuster you "have done everything required by 6.1.2.2 (a) but without using a scoring matrix", so what ? Examples : if you evaluate the risk of deafness in a work activity by measuring noise day exposure level, or if you approach the PSR with the kind of tool that I evoked in a previous message, etc... you are able to document methods and criteria of your OS&H risks assessment process in accordance with ISO 45001 requirements ... Anyway in this case your process is much relevant than with a so-called "probability x gravity scoring matrix" for example !!!!! (As I have said a few times here at Elsmar Cove, this kind of non-specific, unique, totally subjective, approximate, difficult to reproduce, and all-purpose tool is not professional)

In response to your questions here is my reading of Article 6.1.2.2:

- paragraph a) requests to proceed evaluation of the OS&H risks for workers (as OS&H manager I am confortable because it is OS&H issues: electricty, chemicals, etc ...).

- paragraph b) requests to identify and evaluate risks related to the OS&HMS functioning (I am less comfortable because it is not OS&H issues: weakness of our regulatory knowledge for some countries where we have interventions? very soon the only OS&H officer of the company will be retired? etc ... it's depends on your company).

- last paragraph requests to determine and document method(s) and criteria regarding OS&H risk assessment process (cf a)) but not regarding risks related to OS&HMS functioning (cf b)).

I confirme 6.1.2.2 / your questions:
- a): no requirement to use any scoring matrix for OS&H risks assessment.
- b): no requirement of method, criteria or document for OS&HMS risks.
- But requirement to document methods and criteria regarding a) !

Other opinions ? Bye.
 
Last edited:

blockbuster

Starting to get Involved
#96
Henria,

Good afternoon to you. Thank you for your thoughts on 6.1.2.2 .

Looking at this again taking into account your comments, the last paragraph of this clause when read against (a) talks about defining 'methodologies'.

Respectfully, you mentioned 'methods', which is slightly different. Methodology requires the application and involvement of qualitative and quantitative techniques, and therefore, the difficulty we had during our recent audit was that we could not demonstrate that we had defined these for the assessment of OH&S risks. Why? because we do not use a numbers-based system for assessing level of risk (i.e. nothing that is quantitative).

The approach to carrying out our risk assessments is based on experience on what we know are the main OH&S risks in the industry in which we operate, as well as knowledge of our operational processes - no more than that.

The auditor understood what we told him, but he then repeated that last paragraph and asked to see evidence of where we have defined the organisation's methodology and criteria for the assessment of OH&S risks with respect to their scope, nature and timing...... and this is where we struggled.

Cheers,

Block
 
#97
Hello !

Blockbuster, I don't speak the English language but ok, let's take exactly the terms of the standard : ISO 45001 requires "The organization’s methodology(ies) and criteria for the assessment of OH&S risks shall be defined with respect to their scope, nature and timing to ensure they are proactive rather than reactive and are used in a systematic way. Documented information shall be maintained and retained on the methodology(ies) and criteria.

I found différentes definitions of the term "methodology" in dictionaries :
- a set of methods used in a particular area of study or activity
- a system of ways of doing, teaching, or studying something
- a body of methods, rules, and postulates employed by a discipline
- a system of methods and principles for doing something
- etc...
I don't found your idea as "Methodology requires the application and involvement of qualitative and quantitative techniques"...

But your problem with your auditor is not the definition of the term "methodology", it is rather that "you could not demonstrate that you had defined these (methodologies) for the assessment of OH&S risks. Why? because you do not use a numbers-based system for assessing level of risk (i.e. nothing that is quantitative). But what is this "to use a numbers-based system for assessing level of risk" requirement ?

I reuse my previous examples: if I measured the daily noise exposure of a worker at 92 dB (A) ... I have a good assessment of his risk of deafness ; if all the psychosocial risks factors of a team of workers are very "strong" using the tool I already mentioned ... I have a good evaluation of its psychosocial risks. By documenting these methodologies (noise measurement, PSR tool) and their criteria I am compliant with ISO 45001 6.1.2.2... Yes or no ?

Cordially.
 

blockbuster

Starting to get Involved
#98
^^ good mornings.

I think the definitions you have outlined above would involve measurement criteria being applied, and therefore, they fit with what I have previously said about using qualitative and quantitative techniques. Methodology would then require these techniques to be applied in a systematic way.

We couldn’t demonstrate that because, as I have said before, we simply used our experience and knowledge of the task being risk assessed. Nothing wrong with that under normal circumstances, but afraid not good enough to demonstrate compliance with the 45001 clause.

Noise measurement, however, is different because metrics are the main basis for assessment of noise levels. Therefore no problem in being able to demonstrate methodologies and criteria.

But what about all the other tasks, e.g. workplace transport, operation of a guillotine, etc?

Cheers

Block
 
#99
Hello !

Ok Blockbuster, I am ok to consider "methodologies" use qualitative and quantitative elements*, but I say qualitative and/or quantitative because (cf same examples):
- It is obvious that when a risk factor is physically "measurable" (as noice level) we have a quantitative basis, ok.
- but with PSR factors, even if I convert "not concerned, weak, moderate, high" appreciations in numbers, sorry but it is not a more credible quantitative basis !

* I agree... even ISO 45001 does not speak of "qualitative and quantitative" about methodologies used for risks assessment.

I think your problem is a communication issu with your OS&HMS audit (and certification...) provider, not an OS&H prevention issu for workers in your company.

Thanks for this discussion.

Have a nice day.
 
Last edited:

blockbuster

Starting to get Involved
I'd appreciate some other view points on this, as I really did not understand Henria's last post.

In the end, show me an example of a risk assessment carried out on the operation of a band saw (for example) without using numbers to determine levels of risk for the hazards identified. Then provide a full explanation how you can demonstrate compliance with clause 6.1.2.2 .

Cheers

Block
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Ashok sunder Need ISO 45001:2018 HIRA template Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 9
Ashok sunder ISO 45001:2018 Documentation template Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 4
T Book Recommendation for ISO 45001:2018 Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 0
S How to address and implement OH&S opportunities in ISO 45001:2018? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 12
R ISO 45001 (FDIS) Webinar - Jan 24 2018 at 11:00 am ET Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 1
S ISO 45001 and outsourcing the transporation of products Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
R ISO 45001 Lead Auditor Exam paper Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
S ISO 45001 - 5.4 Participation and consultation Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 3
K Beginner in ISO 45001 here! Three questions Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Legal compliance as part of ISO 45001 accredited certification. Major OSHA penalties in the USA. Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 15
I Document templates required for ISO ISO 45001 - Engineering Construction company Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 5
Ashok sunder Needs and expectations of workers and other interested parties ISO 45001 Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 13
Ashok sunder How to determine the internal and external issues in ISO 45001 standard? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
Sidney Vianna Friction between ISO and ILO on the 45001 and 26000 fronts Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
Claes Gefvenberg Publication of ISO 45001 - Occupational Health and Safety - Further delays? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
C Production and Post Production feedback - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
T ISO 13485 - 5.5.1 Responsibility and authority - Small Company Independence ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
A Refusal to discuss ISO 9001 obligations... what to do? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
A What does this sentence "this symbol shall be used in the orientation shown" mean in ISO 780:2015? Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
B Can we be ISO 9001 certified without a physical office? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
D Test summary report example for design validation wanted - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
J Informational ISO 24971:2020 Released ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 0
S Documenting Design Verification Test Results (ISO 9001) Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
A Question on ISO 14001:2015 - Are annual audits required? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 8
N Which EN ISO 17664 version compliance to EU MDR? Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 3
Sidney Vianna Informational New edition of ISO 29001 released (June 2020) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
R Who is the customer in the ISO/IEC 17025:2017? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
T ISO 13485 - Process validation at critical suppliers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
L Combining 3 ISO 9001 registrations into 1 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
M Risk Analysis Flow - Confusion between ISO 14971 and IEC 62304 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 7
C Compliance with ISO 17025 requirement 8.4.2 - Controls - Records recovery ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
N EN ISO 13640:2002 vs EN ISO 23640:2011 Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
O ISO 13485 vs. GMP - Comparison matrix wanted EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K ISO 15223-1 Do Not Reuse and Do Not Resterilize Other Medical Device Related Standards 5
A ISO 10002:2018 Checklist Needed (Complaints Handling) Customer Complaints 5
N Sampling Plan for Internal Audits - ISO 2859 or 3951 - Or Neither? Internal Auditing 6
O ISO 13485 - Is management review required before stage 1? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
BeaBea ISO 9001 Customer Feedback Methods - What has worked for your company? Service Industry Specific Topics 16
O In addition to the standard, what other ISO 13485 sources do people recommend? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Watchcat ISO 13485 for IVD (In-vitro Diagnostic Device) Manufacturers? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
G New to ISO 9001 - Where to begin? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
BeaBea Interesting Discussion Where Does Marketing/ Advertisement of Products fit in to ISO 9001? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 35
G ISO 17025-2017 Management Review reporting items - Inputs ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
F Logistics and IT clauses in ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
Q Automation in manufacturing - Print Shop ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
B ISO 14971 Applied to Software ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
K Contamination Control - Class Is medical devices (Clause 6.4.2 ISO 13485:2016 (E)) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
V Quality Objectives - ISO 9001 2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 26
H ISO 13485:2016 Gap Analysis by NB ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
Gun46 ISO 9001 : 2015 Lead Auditor Exam General Auditing Discussions 5
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom