ISO 9000:2000 Digs its own grave

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Andy Bassett

#1
Didnt know where else to put this, so i created a new thread.

John Seddon who is the UK's best known critic of ISO 9000 has made a holy pronoucement on the new standard which can be found here;
http://www.vanguardconsult.co.uk/iso9000_f.htm

Archived as a pdf file in the http://Elsmar.com/pdf_files/ directory (file name: ISO9000-grave.pdf).

Hope this works

------------------
Andy B

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 28 February 2000).]
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
A

Alan Cotterell

#2
I have read John Seddon's comments with interest, however I disagree with some of the content. I consider the Y2K version of ISO9000 adequately addresses the systems aspects of a QMS, however the QMS is a subsystem of the overall Management System, not synonymous with it as John suggests. What we are talking about is 'Operational Risk Management', I suggest the complete Management System is made up of four major areas - quality, safety, environment, security.
For all operational risks to be controlled we must reconcile the policies in each area into an operating procedure - the 'right way to do a job'.
The problem with the way John proposes is that it puts emphasis on quality where the other risk areas may be neglected. Too often we see channelled thinking - we even see different functions in organisations responsible separately for the major operational risk areas.
Quality is not the 'be all and end all' where operational risk is concerned, safety, environment and security incidents can lead to major loss if not appropriately controlled.
I suggest it is better to develop policies in the four risk areas separately and integrate them into the Management System at the procedure level.
The problem is better understood when we look at the art of Escher. His drawings show perpetual motion, which we know is impossible. The problem is that we cannot look at two parts of a picture at the same time - it is a feature of the human brain, so similarly we normally cannot 'see the big picture' of the management system.
What John seems to suggest is that the other risk areas should be subsidiary to the QMS or integrated after the QMS has been developed. I think in some ways he is right as we must satisfy our customers first or we won't survive, however the other risk areas are of equal importance.
ISO9004.1 (guide to improvement) is equally applicable in all operational risk areas, and I think the comments made on use of statistics are appropriate considering this possible wider application.
 
A

Andy Bassett

#3
G'day sport.

I posted this link to John Seddon just for badness, and to see what i could stir up.

Alan - Im sorry, but im not famous for my attention span. I have seen this notion of 'Operational Risk Management' come up a few times, and its just too abstract for me too absorb.

By all means have another go at educating me, im a shameless stealer of other peoples ideas if i think i can use them, but be aware that of my short attention span, (which you may wish to know is about 4 times longer than your average CEO.)

------------------
Andy B
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#4
There's some truth in it, but most of the arguements are, if you look closely, actually old arguements including "...If it's a QA 'requiremetn' or 'spec', then why doesn't it address quality?..."

The death of ISO9K has been around for quite a while. As long as I can remember. See: http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000166.html

I think you have to look at ISO9 as 1 tool with limitations, as all tools have. A drill is a great tool for certain things but doesn't do everything. A saw is also a great tool, but alone isn't an answer to anything.

John Seddon's review is pretty much a "...ISO doesn't address this..." diatribe. Stuff like "...Lack of any criterion, reference or objectivity about what works..." and if you notice he keeps addressing 'what works'. ISO is one small part. If a company expects ISO to be an 'answer' to everything, they are destined to failure.

In large part, as I read Mr. Seddon's review, I thought of scare tactics. "Buy my book and you'll be rewarded. I'll help you avoid the devil!" At one point he says "... It seems to me the real purpose of documentation has not changed – it is to enable the assessor to do his job..." I think he should have said: "...it is to enable the employees to know, understand and do his/her job..." Some of this whole thing is beliefs and attitudes.

He says: "...The draft lacks integrity, it is contradictory, confusing and, worst of all, very much more demanding. It is unlikely that the auditing community will be competent to work with it..." I'm sorry,, I totally disagree.

I'd go on but it's really just a word and expectations war.

The 'review' is very good 'thought' material, however, I admit. I doubt, 5 years from now, his prophacy will be seen as fulfilled in whole or in part. ISO9K is here for quite a while.
 
A

Alan Cotterell

#5
Dear Andy - OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT
I suggest operational risk (the risk inherent in industrial processes)is able to be categorised into four areas - quality, safety, environment, security. Risk is generally treated by a 'hierarchy of controls of which 'administrative risk control' is part. The documented Management System (including ISO9000) is an example of such a control.
 
J

Joshua Albert

#6
During my sojourn in B-school, we spent a good deal of time discussing quality. This being more than ten years ago, we focussed attention on the organization and techniques used in Japan. We did not discuss formal standards such as ISO-9xxx or QS-9000 as such.

On one hand, it pains me to see these proliferate. Inarguably, there is tremendous expense - both up front and ongoing - required to comply. In light of the Japanese success in producing quality products without these standards (per se), it seems that we may be hampering our long term productivity.

However, in many organizations, there is a need for a catalyst to improve performance in general. Not every organization has access to a top flight general manager with all the needed change management skills. So, in my view anyway, these standards are the price for survival in an environment where there are gaps in the skill level of management (especially in the area of change management) - and the work culture is rife with satisfaction. You still need a good general manager or management team to implement any of these standards effectively - but I think the use of a recognized standard as an authority can be the big assist required to promote the change effort.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Changes I have to make in the QMS - ISO 9000:2000 to ISO 9000:2008 Software Quality Assurance 4
A Changes on the horizon for ISO 9000:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
B Example of an ISO 9000-2000 QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
sathis Is Master Sample a Document? - ISO 9000:2000, Clause 3.7.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 32
J Approval of Grandfathered Documents - ISO 9000:2000 Clauses 4.2.3 a&b Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
S ISO 9000:2000 Electronic Version - Word or Pdf Format? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20
Z Updates / Amendments to the ISO 9000:2000 Standard ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
W Do I need ISO 9000:2005 to use ISO 9001:2000? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 21
A Difference between ISO 9000:1994 & ISO 9000:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
K Differences Between Iso 9001:2000 And Qs-9000 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 9
N ISO 9000:2000 in a service company- Documentation - Do we have to explain exclusions? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
R PS 9000 - PS 9004 & PS 9100 Pharmaceutical vs. ISO 13485-2003 and ISO 9001-2000 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
M QS-9000 to ISO 9001:2000 - Procedures, etc. - What do I do next? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
Q 6 Weeks to convert from QS-9000 TE Supplement to ISO 9001:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
O Quality Systems Manual Ideas - Moving from QS-9000 / TE Supplement to ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 8
Sidney Vianna ISO 9002:2000 - I did not know it existed - Not to mention QS-9000:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 43
I ISO 9000:2000 and ISO 13485:2003 impact on the MDD 93/42/EEC ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
C ISO 9001:2000 E-Learning for people new to ISO 9000 Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
T Is QS-9000 certification acceptable for suppliers or must they be ISO 9001:2000? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 4
G ISO 9000:2000 Document Control Procedure P423 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
Sidney Vianna ISO wants Feedback: ISO Survey on USE of ISO 9000:2000 Series of Standards ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
S Is ISO 9001:2000 Required with QS-9000? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 8
L Use of Octupus and Turtle Diagrams in ISO 9000:2000 Internal Auditing Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 13
B ISO 9000:2000 Basics - Training Videos Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 17
S ISO 9000:2000 to TS 16949:2000 Gap Assessment Tool IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D ISO 9001:2000 TAG Committee - TC 176 is responsible for ISO 9000:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
S ISO 9000:2000 Internal Auditing Resource Books - Process Auditing Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 5
N Upgrading to ISO 9000:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
A How do I start the Transition ISO 9000:2000? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
A Transition from ISO 9000:1994 to ISO 9001:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
A ISO 9001:2000 and the Process Approach vs. QS-9000 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2
Raffy QS-9000 vs. ISO 9001:2000 - Which Should We Persue? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 9
I ISO 9000:2000 Conversion Presentation Request ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
V Table that compares ISO 9000:2000 vs. ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
A QS-9000 Requires ISO 9001:2000 Suppliers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
I QS 9000 based ISO 9000:2000 or ISO 9000:1994 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 9
B QS-9000 vs. ISO 9001:2000 vs. TS 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
A Corrective Actions - ISO 9001:2000 vs. QS-9000 Clause 4.14 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
D ISO 9000:2000 Transition Plan General Auditing Discussions 2
M ISO 9000:2000 and "Quality Objectives" Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 2
A The more ISO 9000:2000 registered companies the better? Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 16
I Required ISO 9000:2000 Procedures - Are procedures still necessary? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
V Iso 9000:2000 / Iso 14000 Integrated Management Systems Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 1
A ISO 9000:2000 Clause 8.3 - Control of Non-Conforming Product Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
J Implementing ISO 9000:2000 using the ISO 9000:1994 Numbering Structure ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
R 21CFR820 vs. ISO 9000:2000 - Cross Reference Matrix Attached ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
L Audit Definition in ISO 9000:2000 includes "documented process"? General Auditing Discussions 2
M Powerpoint .ppt presentation on ISO 9000:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
R ISO 9001:2000 + QS-9000 Quality Manual Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
U Software ISO 9000:2000 Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 1
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom