E
espascua_23
Hi there! I've been an avid viewer of many threads in this site, mostly on how to properly implement the ISO 9001:2008 standard and to be honest, I find it very useful. However, I've tried searching for threads similar to my concern but couldn't find one.
I'm a QA Officer in a trading company which deals with the supply of various machineries and equipments. During my recent internal audit with our Logistics/Stores department, I have recommended that they do inspections/minor functional testing of new machines/equipments before delivering the same to our clients and maintain records of such inspections/testings. My objective is to lessen the number of items being returned to us (under warranty) due to non/mal-functionality, and I have used the subject clause to justify my recommendation.
My question is, was my recommendation necessary and/or did I apply the correct clause? Hope you can also give some insights on how we should (practically) go about this... thanks in advance!
I'm a QA Officer in a trading company which deals with the supply of various machineries and equipments. During my recent internal audit with our Logistics/Stores department, I have recommended that they do inspections/minor functional testing of new machines/equipments before delivering the same to our clients and maintain records of such inspections/testings. My objective is to lessen the number of items being returned to us (under warranty) due to non/mal-functionality, and I have used the subject clause to justify my recommendation.
My question is, was my recommendation necessary and/or did I apply the correct clause? Hope you can also give some insights on how we should (practically) go about this... thanks in advance!