Sidney
Many thanks for making the webinar available. Some observations:
i) the underlying approach is still flawed: ""Those who wish to have a single management system" implies that an organisation might have anything
other than a single management system. An organisation's management system is how it achieves its objectives. How it manages quality (or health and safety, or any other aspect of its operations) is merely an assessment of those elements of how it operates that impact on the quality of its product, or the health and safety of its staff, or the security of its information etc.
At least Nigel dismissed the concept of an "integrated management system".
ii) also flawed is the continual reference to PDCA - what is missing is the Assessment stage which must precede Planning.
iii) "Effective process management" was rightly stressed, but the proposed standard does not seem fully to recognise what this means!
iv) "risk and opportunities" - so the "new" definition of risk has already been abandoned? Good!
v) why was there
ever a requirement for a "quality manual"?
vi) 4.1: why state "external and internal" issues -"issues" would do.
vii) the implication that there are different (additional) processes needed for a QMS, or an EMS, or a H&SMS, implies that ISO do not see "the management system" as the fundamental starting point for any assessment.
viii) other concepts that still need to be sorted out include "internal customer" (this just confuses all other references to "customer" in the standard), "outputs" and "outcomes" (key elements of process management), "Figure 1" of the 2008 standard (trivial and flawed), "transformations" (production line thinking that misses the essentials of a process), "boundaries for the QMS"...
A useful presentation - but worrying!
ADMINISTRATOR NOTE: Please discuss the content of this post in this thread: Problems and Deficiencies with the ISO 9001:2015 Draft
Also consider: What should be changed in the ISO 9001:2015 Standard?
Thanks!