ISO 9001:2015 Draft - Status

[LUV-d-4UM]

This is not English. Thanks anyway

 

[Pancho]

It has been awfully quiet about the DIS... Any news, anyone? Has it seen the light of day yet?

Yesterday I purchased the committee draft from Sidney's link above, but got this:

​

Looks like a duck to me. Or am I missing something?

 

[Pancho]

It also has this note on the cover.

I'm confused. Is this still a committee draft? or is it the DIS? Did anyone download an earlier committee draft to compare with?

​

 

[Sidney Vianna]

Looks like the ISO store has a doc control deficiency . You bought the CD and got the DIS instead. In this case, their mistake is your gain. You are probably one of the first people in the world outside of the TC 176 to have access to the document.

Thanks for sharing the news.

This is not English. Thanks anyway

If you are referring to link that I provided in a previous post concerning a recent presentation by Dr. Croft, the organization that sponsored the event is asking for your email address and and your first and last name before you are granted access to the presentation, which, by the way, is delivered in English.

 

[dacs11]

Just bought it. It is the DIS.

 

[Jeroen]

Pancho, I have the CD version of ISO 9001.

 

[Sidney Vianna]

Or am I missing something?

ISO has updated the page:

 

[WCHorn]

Here's another article (from Quality Digest) on the coming ISO9001:2015. It doesn't offer much new compared to other posts and links in this thread, but I think it's a good read!

 

[Reg Morrison]

Here's another article (from Quality Digest) on the coming ISO9001:2015. It doesn't offer much new compared to other posts and links in this thread, but I think it's a good read!

I wish people would be more critical of articles they read. Excerpts of the linked article:

Although the revised standard will not change the current requirements, it will standardize the language as well as the approaches to management.

What? :mg: ISO 9001:2015 will NOT change the requirements from ISO 9001:2008? What about dropping requirements for a management representative and a quality manual? What about the introduction of risk based thinking? What about the deletion of preventive actions? How can we say with a straight face that the revised document will not change the requirements?

The revision has several goals:
? Provide a stable framework of requirements for the next 10 years. Based on the introduction of eight major quality management principles:
1. Improved consistency with traceability
2. Enhanced customer focus
3. Focused leadership
4. The involvement of people
5. A system approach to management
6. Continual improvement
7. A factual approach to decision making
8. Mutually beneficial supplier relationships

Quality Management Principles are being introduced? We've had QM principles for a long time. And, my understanding of the ISO 9001 revision is that we have now 7 QMP's:
Customer Focus, Leadership, Engagement of People, Process Approach, Improvement, Evidence-based Decision Making and Relationship Management.

What would be the Improved consistency with traceability Principle?

? Take into account changes to the practices and technology of quality management since the last major revision in 2000, such as:
?Barcoding systems for customer property control
?More comprehensive, integrated quality management system (QMS) software
?Quality manuals, procedures, and forms now in digital format

Really? We did not have barcoding, digital documents and enterprise QMS software in 2000?

I wish the scrutiny over content of articles would force publications to raise the bar.

 

[WCHorn]

I wish the scrutiny over content of articles would force publications to raise the bar.

Thank you for your critique. I will try to be more selective. Regarding your final thought, the article provides the opportunity for feedback. I encourage you to provide it on that forum to help the publication raise the bar.